Rangers Lady 2,380 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Answer is simple each of us has the choice to be on here or not. If it get to a point you don't approve of the way the site is run, just join another forum or start your own.Ok I wasn't being so serious that time, but your reasoning is way too rational so, I'm out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eosmhdo 1,879 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Good to see the ban on heavy bullshit has been lifted. Where can I pick up my thrashing pole and broom?!Ed's advertising one on eBay cstamomusa 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewart1969 16 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Hello Hello from Hong Kong,It cannot be comfortable for Chris Graham having to debate issues with people who choose, for whatever reason, to remain anonymous.Surely the majority would agree.I am happy for people to know who I am.I have not always agreed with Chris.I have never met him.I've exchanged emails with him but I rarely if ever post on here as I don't understand the concept of debating something with a faceless,nameless person or persons.Like many fans,players,staff,management etc I do read RM on a daily basis to keep in touch with developments.I don't use FF.But should Forums like this not offer a wee bit more protection for lads who are out there in the open?Should Moderators do more for those who are not anonymous?Why not PM others and be up front?It's hidden agendas that have caused most of the trouble we are in.A bit more transparency is needed from top to bottom. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane 338 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Ed's advertising one on eBay Only one? He's a savvier investor than that eosmhdo 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wullyRFC 5,230 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Chris Graham is the least of our worries. WATP-FOREVER 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mor3los_1 3,672 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Hello Hello from Hong Kong,It cannot be comfortable for Chris Graham having to debate issues with people who choose, for whatever reason, to remain anonymous.Surely the majority would agree.I am happy for people to know who I am.I have not always agreed with Chris.I have never met him.I've exchanged emails with him but I rarely if ever post on here as I don't understand the concept of debating something with a faceless,nameless person or persons.Like many fans,players,staff,management etc I do read RM on a daily basis to keep in touch with developments.I don't use FF.But should Forums like this not offer a wee bit more protection for lads who are out there in the open?Should Moderators do more for those who are not anonymous?Why not PM others and be up front?It's hidden agendas that have caused most of the trouble we are in.A bit more transparency is needed from top to bottom.He shouldn't come on to internet forums then if that is the case, he should join Facebook instead. I don't have a problem with Chris, i may disagree with most of his views like many others. I would rather be talking about Rangers as this is Rangers Media, not Chris Graham Fury Media. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Where in HK you based? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Band of Brothers 10,303 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 I have not commented on this all day but may I say it's good to see fury come out all guns blazing to a few. I don't keep up with all the blogs and bloggers but anytime I've seen the lad on tv he did us proud, as for yer agenda big man I'm sure it's aw for Rangers but without being the voice of everyone that supports the club tells me yer not keeping yer wee toes on the ground no disrespect to you I think you fight well for Rangers but speak to yer fellow bears with the respect you now demand. cstamomusa and damien1 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cstamomusa 3,809 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Hello Hello from Hong Kong,It cannot be comfortable for Chris Graham having to debate issues with people who choose, for whatever reason, to remain anonymous.Surely the majority would agree.I am happy for people to know who I am.I have not always agreed with Chris.I have never met him.I've exchanged emails with him but I rarely if ever post on here as I don't understand the concept of debating something with a faceless,nameless person or persons.Like many fans,players,staff,management etc I do read RM on a daily basis to keep in touch with developments.I don't use FF.But should Forums like this not offer a wee bit more protection for lads who are out there in the open?Should Moderators do more for those who are not anonymous?Why not PM others and be up front?It's hidden agendas that have caused most of the trouble we are in.A bit more transparency is needed from top to bottom.Do you think Chris should also be transparent with his contacts that he gets information from? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlBear. 8,499 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 FFS admin. What benefit you see in this thread, I don't know.Should have been chopped long ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Hello Hello from Hong Kong,It cannot be comfortable for Chris Graham having to debate issues with people who choose, for whatever reason, to remain anonymous.Surely the majority would agree.I am happy for people to know who I am.I have not always agreed with Chris.I have never met him.I've exchanged emails with him but I rarely if ever post on here as I don't understand the concept of debating something with a faceless,nameless person or persons.Like many fans,players,staff,management etc I do read RM on a daily basis to keep in touch with developments.I don't use FF.But should Forums like this not offer a wee bit more protection for lads who are out there in the open?Should Moderators do more for those who are not anonymous?Why not PM others and be up front?It's hidden agendas that have caused most of the trouble we are in.A bit more transparency is needed from top to bottom.I have to say i probably agree with this. I havent seen eye to eye with Chris since he put his weight behind the RST but i do feel the thread and the abuse is way over the top.I started a thread a few days ago offering an olive branch to Chris but unfortunately it got pulled, no doubt for the abuse that we didnt get to see on it.Now Monty, as Ive stuck up for you, thats a free Lama Island ticket for me for next year for the defense of the Legends crown. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 30 pages ahahahahaha.Honestly this place at times WadeWilson 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluepeter 5,627 Posted August 20, 2013 Share Posted August 20, 2013 Enough's enough. Children. WadeWilson 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts