Cherster Perry 1977 18 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Despite his repeated statements and pledges to his own shareholders that he will not spend ANY time on any business other than his current interests?I think we are on shifting sands here.Things will become clearer re McColls poistion post EGM/AGM, in addition Dave King is due an appearance I would have thought. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,308 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 1. we shouldn't be giving interviews to that rag2. he appears to not have a backboneUp early and first to spread doom and gloom. Weren't you the one harping on about Ally's wages yesterday? Well they are under review. So maybe you can be happy for a split second. Anyhow, Mathers has clarified a lot of things for me. Wish he'd done it sooner and through a better source though. His willingness to cut costs and compromise r.e. the boardroom setup are key for me. Season tickets have taken a nose dive, so the sooner the infighting is over the better. Oh, and start investigating the leak Mather. Our partial accounts shouldn't be getting leaked!!!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 hmm about 52m taking in..................and about 10m left.........And, thats ok ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Although the facts we do have are that someone is lying to us reagrding Media House.Craig Mather was poorly prepared for this interview in my opinion and has raised more questions than answers.Some of you are getting so hung up on this media house thing and are focussing on that as a negative whilst missing all the positives....a quess people need something to moan about but in the grand scheme of things does media houses involvement or lack of really matter one way or another? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 hmm about 52m taking in..................and about 10m left.........And, thats ok ?Maybe yeah....we might have spent alot of money internalising contracts and initiating long term money making avenues (shops, car park etc)...,either way wait until the accounts are published and you will get your answer! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR 1,480 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Surprise surprise ..... knobjocky 1 and knobjocky 2 think the same , admin please get these two to fuck , its obviously the same person ffs !! Every thread it's the same pish getting spouted !!On what grounds? That they don't share the same opinion as you? Now what kind of Forum Website would do something like that...? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JR 1,480 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 hmm about 52m taking in..................and about 10m left.........And, thats ok ?I agree at first glance that looks poor, but it won't be until we see those figures in context in the full, detailed accounts that we can make a truly informed opinion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Resting in my account 231 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Surprise surprise ..... knobjocky 1 and knobjocky 2 think the same , admin please get these two to fuck , its obviously the same person ffs !! Every thread it's the same pish getting spouted !!Excuse me, knobjockey? How dare you.....Emm so you think that certain elements within our support will like this interview given that it ruins their lies and propaganda? Or do you think we have no parasites in out support who use Rangers for an income and platform? Now deep breaths before you reply, no insults please. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cherster Perry 1977 18 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Some of you are getting so hung up on this media house thing and are focussing on that as a negative whilst missing all the positives....a quess people need something to moan about but in the grand scheme of things does media houses involvement or lack of really matter one way or another?I am not comfortable with the board lying about anything to be honest, particularly while there is so much uncertainty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Cheers for the copy and paste job Not even a mention as to where it came from................Think Snoopy should hang on Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edmiston Drive 3,846 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 hmm about 52m taking in..................and about 10m left.........And, thats ok ?Yes it is................. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 So £10m in bank, only including small percentage of season book money with merchandise and puma cash to come plus revenue from matchday and cup games?ffs how will mitre spread despondency now?He is awaiting instructions Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Surprise surprise ..... knobjocky 1 and knobjocky 2 think the same , admin please get these two to fuck , its obviously the same person ffs !! Every thread it's the same pish getting spouted !!Oh dear 67 posts and you want to set editorial policy? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmutschone 450 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 On what grounds? That they don't share the same opinion as you?Now what kind of Forum Website would do something like that...?On the grounds that I have never seen either one post something positive about the club or our manager !!! Every post has a negative slant that is either intended to divide the support , or to crave attention !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmutschone 450 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Oh dear 67 posts and you want to set editorial policy?No , just my opinion .... forgive me for being sick of so called fans constantly sticking the boot into our manager , club ..... doesn't matter what it is , those two have nothing good to say about rangers fc !! Is that ok Mr 15,000 posts ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 No , just my opinion .... forgive me for being sick of so called fans constantly sticking the boot into our manager , club ..... doesn't matter what it is , those two have nothing good to say about rangers fc !! Is that ok Mr 15,000 posts ??Naw - it's not ok Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmutschone 450 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Excuse me, knobjockey? How dare you.....Emm so you think that certain elements within our support will like this interview given that it ruins their lies and propaganda? Or do you think we have no parasites in out support who use Rangers for an income and platform? Now deep breaths before you reply, no insults please.Is Parasites not an insult no ?? In regards to your question .... Yes ... you and your pal the host !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueAvenger 10,188 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Perhaps the interview should have been with RTV or Gers website.Some good points by Mather but some questionable.With regard to Mather's position, I'll sit on the fence with splinters on my arse.. for the time being (let's see the accounts.) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helmutschone 450 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Naw - it's not ok Well I couldn't give a shiny shite what you think Mr 15, 000 posts ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 So CRO have nailed their agenda to the mast and are no longer impartial. I thought it was a good statement from Mather. If all there is to moan about is media house when TBK `s constantly use the Daily rhebel then some people have to have a hard look at their self.Mather will do for me.Lets move on and hopefully the club can move forward without all the dramas. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Non_Sucumbi 876 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Perhaps the interview should have been with RTV or Gers website.Why he reaches a wider audience via the Herald though not by a huge margin. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenTundras 120 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 I can't understand the mentality of some people who insist on seeing bad wherever they look.Here we have a good statement that we can use vast swathes of to combat the slings and arrows thrown at us from the scaremongering hordes, yet all we seem to be doing is picking holes in minor points and aligning ourselves to one 'side' or the other.Does my nut in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcoholic 1,348 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Phew. Thank god for that.Everything is ok and I needn't have worried about anything.Super.Can we go back to talking about the football again now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FrozenTundras 120 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 Phew. Thank god for that.Everything is ok and I needn't have worried about anything.There's a lot less to worry about than either side - or the media, or the scaremongering hordes - will have you believe.The brinkmanship and the lengths either side will go to, is the single most worrying aspect. Everyone just needs to step back and see the bigger picture, especially when the accounts are released. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted August 30, 2013 Share Posted August 30, 2013 1. we shouldn't be giving interviews to that rag2. he appears to not have a backbone1. Bollocks2. More bollocks Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.