rankbadyin 11 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 As title. Think the second 13/09/2013 should be 30/09/2013Company Rangers Int. Football Club PLC TIDM RFC Headline Further to requisition of general meeting Released 07:00 10-Sep-2013 Number 5771N07 RNS Number : 5771NRangers Int. Football Club PLC10 September 201310 September 2013Rangers International Football Club plc("Rangers", the "Company" or "Club")Further to requisition of general meetingFurther to the announcement on 4 September 2013, the Company confirms that whilst the Board's discussions have continued with representatives of the group who requisitioned (together the "Requisitioners") a general meeting to consider the proposed resolutions ("Requisition") detailed in the announcement on 2 August 2013 ("General Meeting"), the Board is disappointed to announce that no agreement has been reached.Unless an agreement can be reached prior to 13 September 2013, as set out in the announcement on 2 September 2013, the Company will be required to send a notice to shareholders to convene the General Meeting by no later than 13 September 2013.Further announcements will be made as appropriate.For further information please contact:Rangers International Football Club plc Tel: 0141 580 8647 Craig Mather, CEO Brian Stockbridge, FD Strand Hanson Limited (Nominated Adviser) Tel: 020 7409 3494 Stuart Faulkner / Rory Murphy / Richard Tulloch Daniel Stewart & Company plc (Broker) Tel: 020 7776 6550 Paul Shackleton Newgate Threadneedle (Financial PR) Tel: 020 7148 6143 Graham Herring / John Coles / Fiona Conroy Media House International Ltd Tel: 020 7710 0020 Jack Irvine http://www.londonsto...mentId=11703586 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
No.12 508 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 What does this mean? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 It means Charlie is playing hardball with the rhebs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwelly 115 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 It means Charlie is playing hardball with the rhebs.Or does it mean the "rhebs" are playing hardball with Charlie?!??The mind boggles! :-) Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieG54 812 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Bored now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rankbadyin 11 Posted September 10, 2013 Author Share Posted September 10, 2013 I doubt anyone is playing hardball, probably and more simply the requisitioners are short of the support they are alleged to have to force any issue. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 What does this mean?The Requisitioners are not prepared to give in the the Board's demand that they give an undertaking not to vote against the reappointment of existing directors at the AGM. I would suggest that this means that the requisitioners are confident of victory. If they were not, surely they would just accept the Board's compromise? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,890 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Beyond boring now..Seems to me that Mccoll and co's bluff has been called. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,248 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 It means Charlie is playing hardball with the rhebs.With no shares, exactly what is Charlie's interest in the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 It means Charlie is playing hardball with the rhebs.Sorry, but your hero has found another toy to play with. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarrhillLoyal 32 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Getting really fed up with this.The Board seem to be being dictated to by a bunch who haven spent bugger all in the club.Coming across as very weak and impotent now.Instead of continual postponements and negotiations why not just call the meeting? I'll be thereThese postponements give me, at least, the impression the board don't want things out in the open. Anyone else agree with me? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essandoh 21,207 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Lost track of this a long time ago. I have no idea what's going on anymore. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,874 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Fucks this shit? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wafflesniffer 399 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Sigh...Roll on 3pm Saturday please. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 EGM on the cards by Friday according to the wanks in the mhedia. I've got to the point where I don't much care who wins anymore just as long as this is over and wecan forget all about EGMs and AGMs and boardroom battles a good boardroom should be like a good ref you don't notice them because they do their job efficiently and correctly. Our board is the complete opposite of this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 So it's looking likely the EGM will be in October ? Same as the AGM ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 So it's looking likely the EGM will be in October ? Same as the AGM ?I read it as it will happen by Friday but that could be mhedia bullshit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 I read it as it will happen by Friday but that could be mhedia bullshit.No, a decision to combine the EGM and the AGM must be made by this Friday. If no agreement is reached, the Board have to fix a date for an EGM and notify shareholders. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gillete 1,338 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 So regardless of the EGM, the AGM should be in October 100% ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 No, a decision to combine the EGM and the AGM must be made by this Friday. If no agreement is reached, the Board have to fix a date for an EGM and notify shareholders.OK thanks Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 My interpretation of this relates to the vote of confidence for existing shareholders. My guess is that the board haven't got their guarantee and will be put up for the vote like all other existing and proposed board members. I now expect the board to say that the Requisitioners are costing the club money, when it could be argued that it is the board that are actually trying to protect themselves and they are responsible for the cost due to their demand for a cast iron guarantee of job safety.The board can't be too confident that they still have the support of existing shareholders. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 So regardless of the EGM, the AGM should be in October 100% ?Nothing is 100% with these muppets running our club at the moment, plus there's no legal requirement to have the AGM in October and the deadline for audited accounts isn't until well into the new year. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 358 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 My interpretation of this relates to the vote of confidence for existing shareholders. My guess is that the board haven't got their guarantee and will be put up for the vote like all other existing and proposed board members. I now expect the board to say that the Requisitioners are costing the club money, when it could be argued that it is the board that are actually trying to protect themselves and they are responsible for the cost due to their demand for a cast iron guarantee of job safety.Spot on. The board aren't confident enough to simply agree to a GM without some guarantees that they'll keep their jobs.Statements like this and more delays just embarrass our board even further. If they had an ounce of dignity left, they would call the EGM and get this over and done with. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rankbadyin 11 Posted September 10, 2013 Author Share Posted September 10, 2013 Spot on. The board aren't confident enough to simply agree to a GM without some guarantees that they'll keep their jobs.Statements like this and more delays just embarrass our board even further. If they had an ounce of dignity left, they would call the EGM and get this over and done with.There is nothing to stop the requisitioners convening their own GM and billing the club, so why don't they. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Hammer of Der Gods 421 Posted September 10, 2013 Share Posted September 10, 2013 Beyond boring this crap. Can't wait for the footie on saturday. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.