Jump to content

Sacking the board


Redwhiteandblue

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Someone said in another thread that no one has put themselves forward??

It's an AGM. All the existing directors are up for re-election. Those expressing an interest in becoming a director may (in terms of the articles of association) be required to give some advance notice but, as far as I am aware, shareholders have not yet been notified of the date for the AGM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an AGM. All the existing directors are up for re-election. Those expressing an interest in becoming a director may (in terms of the articles of association) be required to give some advance notice but, as far as I am aware, shareholders have not yet been notified of the date for the AGM.

So it not a vote for sacking the board or not?

In other words, if you don't vote for someone else, the current board stay on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it not a vote for sacking the board or not?

In other words, if you don't vote for someone else, the current board stay on?

The existing directors will almost certainly put their names forward for re-election. Others like PM might also put their names forward. The shareholders will then have to vote to decide who should become directors of the club for the next financial year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a meaningless buzz phrase sack the board, as you say RWB who takes over? Can't just be any old cunt with a 6 pack and a smile, it's a bit like saying sack the government it can't be done, you can vote a government out at election time by voting somebody else in, but unless Mini and CO are standing for election to our board and I'm not sure what would entitle them to do so then what the Fuck would we do if no directors were reelected?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a meaningless buzz phrase sack the board, as you say RWB who takes over? Can't just be any old cunt with a 6 pack and a smile, it's a bit like saying sack the government it can't be done, you can vote a government out at election time by voting somebody else in, but unless Mini and CO are standing for election to our board and I'm not sure what would entitle them to do so then what the Fuck would we do if no directors were reelected?

Has PM even said what position he wants to stand for?
Link to post
Share on other sites

That will convince most Bears then (td) What is it you propagandists don't get about this man? Most Bears do not want anyone from the old board coming back again. Only the gullible and the blazer chasers do.

The vast majority of Rangers supporters would support Paul Murray being voted onto the board. Don't be fooled by a few drama queens on here. They are far from representative of the Rangers support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That will convince most Bears then (td) What is it you propagandists don't get about this man? Most Bears do not want anyone from the old board coming back again. Only the gullible and the blazer chasers do.

Most Bears! The 220 folk on here who regard PM as 'bad news' are not representative of the 40,000 that turn up at Ibrox nor, I suspect of the Bears who are entitled to vote at the AGM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vast majority of Rangers supporters would support Paul Murray being voted onto the board. Don't be fooled by a few drama queens on here. They are far from representative of the Rangers support.

Haha don't make me laugh, Mini is despised by many and liked by a few.

No way will he get enough votes to be out on the board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has PM even said what position he wants to stand for?

No and what would entitle him to stand anyway unless anybody can do it, but if not I would imagine there's a criteria to meet and would Murray even meet any criteria given his less than successful time on the board previously.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really understand how this works ? I would assume the institution investor share holdings get a vote. Given that they are in the majority ( £17M out of £22M raised if I remember correctly ) would that mean the ordinary fan shareholders won't really have much say ?

Ie is your vote in proportion to the amount of shares you hold ? I appreciate the institutional investors vote could be split.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most Bears! The 220 folk on here who regard PM as 'bad news' are not representative of the 40,000 that turn up at Ibrox nor, I suspect of the Bears who are entitled to vote at the AGM.

Have you done a poll to back this up, or is it just another made up fact that is polled on a forum?

All the forums put together would not probably represent the majority of ST holders. There is a large part of our support who don't frequent forums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despised. Really? Such a strong word to describe a fellow Rangers supporter. What has he done or not done to make you hate him that much?

You often ask this question and then disappear when you get the answer.

Not what you want to hear ? :lol:

Do you think him wanting to give ten million quid of our money to Ticketus for a bill we don't owe, and take a ten million quid loan from them for working capital is good corporate governance ?

Any chance of an answer this time or shall we just assume you are at it ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Despised. Really? Such a strong word to describe a fellow Rangers supporter. What has he done or not done to make you hate him that much?

Do you think that when SDM done what he done to our club, the fact he sat back and done fuckall is acceptable ?

The fact he continually runs to a paper insistant on damaging our clubs reputation.

The fact he demands answers from the current board and wants on the current board without investing so much as a fucking penny?

Shall I continue ??

Ps - Fellow Rangers supporter, that's debatable, real fans I know wouldn't do anything this man does at all !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it is very simple. If the current board produce audited accounts prior to the AGM I will decide on how I vote based on the finacial state of the club. If they do not produce audited accounts prior to the AGM I would need to assume the finances are not good and vote for change.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think that when SDM done what he done to our club, the fact he sat back and done fuckall is acceptable ?

I think you'll find Paul Murray signed a letter, along with every one of his fellow board members, urging SDM not to sell to Craig Whyte. To suggest he 'sat back and did fuckall' is simply not true.

The fact he continually runs to a paper insistant on damaging our clubs reputation.

Paul Murray has used many media outlets. His goal is to reach the largest audience possible. Sometimes you have to look at the bigger picture.

The fact he demands answers from the current board and wants on the current board without investing so much as a fucking penny?

He is acting on behalf of 28% of shareholders who have asked him to represent them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 20 October 2024 11:00 Until 13:00
      0  
      Kilmarnock v Rangers
      The BBSP Stadium, Rugby Park
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Football HD

×
×
  • Create New...