bawsburst 1,381 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 As title . Regulatory Story Company Rangers Int. Football Club PLC TIDM RFC Headline Holding(s) in Company Released 07:02 01-Oct-2013 Number 3421P07 RNS Number : 3421PRangers Int. Football Club PLC01 October 20131 October 2013Rangers International Football Club plc("Rangers", the "Company" or "Club")Holding in the CompanyRangers announces that it was notified on 30 September 2013 that following a disposal of ordinary shares of 1 pence each in the Company on 10 September 2013 by Charles Green, he no longer has a notifiable interest in the Company's issued share capital.For further information please contact:Rangers International Football Club plc Craig Mather, CEO Brian Stockbridge, FD Tel: 0141 580 8647 Daniel Stewart & Company plc Tel: 020 777 6578 Paul Shackleton / James Thomas / Martin Lampshire Newgate Threadneedle Tel: 020 7148 6143 Graham Herring / Roddy Watt / John Coles / Fiona Conroy Media House International Ltd Jack Irvine Tel: 020 7710 0020 Regulatory Story Company Rangers Int. Football Club PLC TIDM RFC Headline Notice under section 338 of the Companies Act 2006 Released 07:03 01-Oct-2013 Number 3423P07 RNS Number : 3423PRangers Int. Football Club PLC01 October 2013Rangers International Football Club plc("Rangers" or the "Company")Notice under section 338 of the Companies Act 2006The Board of Rangers confirms that it has received a notice dated 27 September 2013 from certain minority shareholders ("Notifying Shareholders") under section 338 of the Companies Act 2006 requesting the Company to circulate certain resolutions to shareholders for inclusion in the business at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting of the Company (the "Notice"). The Notice puts forward resolutions for the appointment of Malcolm Murray, Paul Murray, Scott Murdoch and Alex Wilson as directors of the Company. Whilst the Board has requested the Notifying Shareholders to authenticate their signatures on the Notice and their shareholdings as required under section 338 of the Companies Act 2006 in order to validate the Notice, the Board notes that the Notice has been received by certain of the minority shareholders who were involved with the Requisition, the receipt of which by the Company was announced by the Company on 2 August 2013. The Board further notes that on 12 September 2013 the Company announced that the Requisitioners had agreed the withdrawal of the Requisition including their proposal for the appointment of directors on the condition only that the Company convened and held its Annual General Meeting no later than 31 October 2013. The Board notes that no variation or amendment to the terms of the withdrawal of the Requisition has been discussed or agreed with the Requisitioners. The Board considers that the Notice, if authenticated, is unlikely to be properly constituted under s338 of the Companies Act 2006. Given the basis upon which the Requisitioners had agreed the withdrawal of the Requisition and as the Notifying Shareholders have not requested to discuss this prior to sending the Notice, the Board currently considers the proposed resolutions to be vexatious. The Board is also concerned that the contents of the proposed resolutions may also be either ineffective or frivolous as any director appointment must comply with the Company's articles of association and is subject to prior regulatory approval. The Board further notes that the notice for the Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held on 24 October 2013 had in any event been sent to the Company's printers for printing on Friday 27 September 2013. Further announcements will be made as appropriate.For further information please contact:Rangers International Football Club plc Craig Mather, CEO Brian Stockbridge, FD Tel: 0141 580 8647 Daniel Stewart & Company plc Tel: 020 777 6578 Paul Shackleton / James Thomas / Martin Lampshire Newgate Threadneedle Tel: 020 7148 6143 Graham Herring / Roddy Watt / John Coles / Fiona Conroy Media House International Ltd Jack Irvine Tel: 020 7710 0020 Stock Exchange Announcmenthttp://m.londonstockexchange.com/exc...entId=11726707http://m.londonstockexchange.com/exc...entId=11726708 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 "Vexatious, ineffective, frivolous"That a good summary of the Minico gang Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted October 1, 2013 Author Share Posted October 1, 2013 "Vexatious, ineffective, frivolous"That a good summary of the Minico gangWorse than amateurs. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redwhiteandblue 3,330 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Who owns CG's shares? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodvale1690 43 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 how come andy murray isn't on the list Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 how come andy murray isn't on the list Al Murray would be a more popular appointment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,285 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Al Murray would be a more popular appointment.Cheers!!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 What happened to them getting Christian Purslow for the board. lol. They are tools ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 lolwhat a shambles they are Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cadman 354 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 What happened to them getting Christian Purslow for the board. lol. They are tools ! Apparently they have him lined up for a 'Senior Executive role and tasked with leading the new regime' according to Jackson at the Record. So not a board member, but i'll bet he won't be cheap to employ. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
allgers 735 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I have to admit at the start of the McColl debacle I was prepared to look on it as maybe the path to take for the security of our great Club. The reality has been anything but, their half arsed attempts to destabilise the club has filled column space in the rhags and cost the Club revenue. The protests at the weekend was a PR disaster for the group and might even have swayed attitude against them. The accounts could not have came at a worse time for them, I'm sure they had a full schedule of protests planned over the next week. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Al Murray would be a more popular appointment.Chic Murray even? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I have to admit at the start of the McColl debacle I was prepared to look on it as maybe the path to take for the security of our great Club. The reality has been anything but, their half arsed attempts to destabilise the club has filled column space in the rhags and cost the Club revenue. The protests at the weekend was a PR disaster for the group and might even have swayed attitude against them. The accounts could not have came at a worse time for them, I'm sure they had a full schedule of protests planned over the next week.McColl seems to have removed himself from the fray. His and Murrays involvement with us over the last couple of years have certainly been a half arsed disaster. Still Murray is proposing new directors so its going to be interesting to see how they present their plan to the fans if they actually have one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 People should re listen to Craig from SoS last night in light of today's results Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 People should re listen to Craig from SoS last night in light of today's resultsWhat's he giving it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 What's he giving it?Worth a listen when u get a minuteWell intentioned but well out his depth and relying on Charlotte Fakes information Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonofbear 398 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I have to admit at the start of the McColl debacle I was prepared to look on it as maybe the path to take for the security of our great Club. The reality has been anything but, their half arsed attempts to destabilise the club has filled column space in the rhags and cost the Club revenue. The protests at the weekend was a PR disaster for the group and might even have swayed attitude against them. The accounts could not have came at a worse time for them, I'm sure they had a full schedule of protests planned over the next week. Unfortunately the protests will still continue mate. Listening to the podcast last night SOS guy made it clear it was not just about the finances ( they appeared to take the charlotte fakes as fact BTW ). They will continue to protest against the board as they deem them not to be fit and proper. For me the spokesman came across as a genuine type of guy but perhaps maybe a bit naive and gullible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,285 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Chic Murray even?Chic Murray is dead, but his speewweet wives on Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Chic Murray is dead, but his speewweet wives onI'm making a Chic Murray cake and getting a load of Thai weans over to share it with me Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,285 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 I'm making a Chic Murray cake and getting a load of Thai weans over to share it with meFucking loved chic murray. Sorry feel as though I have trolled a little. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsox1 1,361 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Unfortunately the protests will still continue mate. Listening to the podcast last night SOS guy made it clear it was not just about the finances ( they appeared to take the charlotte fakes as fact BTW ). They will continue to protest against the board as they deem them not to be fit and proper. For me the spokesman came across as a genuine type of guy but perhaps maybe a bit naive and gullible.Was one of the main SoS guys not banned from Rangers a while back ? If so a bit rich protesting about being fit and proper .SoS have about as much clout as FF . Not a lot. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonofbear 398 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Was one of the main SoS guys not banned from Rangers a while back ? If so a bit rich protesting about being fit and proper .SoS have about as much clout as FF . Not a lot.I believe he was, but not the lad on last night. None of our fans groups have any clout because they're so divided and some are downright devisive. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reformation Bear 6,453 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 The statement by the Board has, in my view, clearly been crafted by Rangers' solicitors. It's a long time since I've seen an accusation of 'vexatious', and even longer since I've seen it used in public. Ditto using terms such as 'frivolous'. I may be very wrong here but the statement seems tantamount to a declaration of war with the Murray camp. A 'gloves of' type of statement. It leaves no room for manouver in doing a deal with them (the door for that was open after the August Requisition attempt) but the language now being used keeps that door firmly shut. Looks like it will now be a legal battle as to the legitimacy of the latest Murray move; and possibly a media battle of accusation and counter-accusation with the sole intention of convincing enough investors of their respective cases (and perhaps competences!) before the AGM. Unless there is a pretty powerful legal rebuttal by Murray, it does on the face of it seem like their competence in trying to achieve whatever underlying or hidden objectives they have is very much in doubt. Looks like the nature of the contest is about to change gear. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cushynumber 25,178 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 Vexatious. I am terribly terribly vexed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted October 1, 2013 Share Posted October 1, 2013 The statement by the Board has, in my view, clearly been crafted by Rangers' solicitors. It's a long time since I've seen an accusation of 'vexatious', and even longer since I've seen it used in public. Ditto using terms such as 'frivolous'. I may be very wrong here but the statement seems tantamount to a declaration of war with the Murray camp. A 'gloves of' type of statement. It leaves no room for manouver in doing a deal with them (the door for that was open after the August Requisition attempt) but the language now being used keeps that door firmly shut. Looks like it will now be a legal battle as to the legitimacy of the latest Murray move; and possibly a media battle of accusation and counter-accusation with the sole intention of convincing enough investors of their respective cases (and perhaps competences!) before the AGM. Unless there is a pretty powerful legal rebuttal by Murray, it does on the face of it seem like their competence in trying to achieve whatever underlying or hidden objectives they have is very much in doubt. Looks like the nature of the contest is about to change gear.The door was open to the rebels when Blin (the messiah) was offered a place on the boardThat didny suit them as Mini wasn't given a ticket as well and Blin was reall only a useful idiot for MiniLooks like Blin has seen through Mini's scam and slung his hook Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.