Drunk and disorderly. 14,393 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 So we play him but dont make him our 'main man'? Or we dont play him incase he gets injured?I never said he was our main man. He doesn't need to be. He is a fine young player in his own right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 I never said he was our main man. He doesn't need to be. He is a fine young player in his own right.What the fuck is wrong with you? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 Making a youngster the main man in this division would be a sure way to get him a broken leg. Too many hatchet men and too few good refs.WTF? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOAT 30,449 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 I didn't say that. I'm saying if you make him the main man against teams like Dunfermline they will target him and injure him. Pretty much the way they did with 5 of our players. Stitches, fractures and broken bones. I'd prefer to protect Lewis from that.So you want us not to play him, to protect him? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 So you want us not to play him, to protect him?Naw we can play him but he cant be our 'main man' Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,393 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 What the fuck is wrong with you?I mistakenly thought I was having a football debate with you. You are turning it into a slagging match. Good night. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 If there was ever a time for Ally to give 3-4 youngsters eg Aird instead of Templeton, Crawford instead of Peralta, McAusland now that Fosters a long term crock. The league is already won what is there to lose? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 I mistakenly thought I was having a football debate with you. You are turning it into a slagging match. Good night.Night night Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 14, 2013 Share Posted November 14, 2013 I mistakenly thought I was having a football debate with you. You are turning it into a slagging match. Good night.Night x Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 How on earth are you getting I dont rate him from that post? I've said I rate him higher than them about 3 times in this thread and if it was up to me he'd be playing. My point is if he was in the top 100 youngsters in the world McCoist would be making him the main man in our team and he isn't.**Not a dig at McCoist before anyone starts.How many On that list are the "main man" for their teams? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 How many On that list are the "main man" for their teams?No idea I didn't do it.How many are playing in the 3rd tier of Scottish football? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 No idea I didn't do it.How many are playing in the 3rd tier of Scottish football?What Im trying to say is.. not many of these players are the "main men" for their teams as they are all young players.. some will become that player, and that is kind of what this list is all about. These are "players to watch" for the most part.I will answer your question, as thats only fair - 1.How many on that list are the "main man" for their teams? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 What Im trying to say is.. not many of these players are the "main men" for their teams as they are all young players.. some will become that player, and that is kind of what this list is all about. These are "players to watch" for the most part.I will answer your question, as thats only fair - 1.How many on that list are the "main man" for their teams?You're completely missing my point but I'm done debating this now and saying the same things over and over; I think he's a good player with a lot of potential but isn't good enough to be on that list. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 You're completely missing my point but I'm done debating this now and saying the same things over and over; I think he's a good player with a lot of potential but isn't good enough to be on that list.Im not really.. You said that if he was on that list, then he would be the main man for us, but he isnt etc, so I think its only fair to ask how many of the others on that list are the main men for their teams, as they surely should be if they are on that list, no? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 Im not really.. You said that if he was on that list, then he would be the main man for us, but he isnt etc, so I think its only fair to ask how many of the others on that list are the main men for their teams, as they surely should be if they are on that list, no?No. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I said this'My point is if he was in the top 100 youngsters in the world McCoist would be making him the main man in our team and he isn't'I think that's a valid point considering where we are just now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 No.No what? They shouldnt be on the list if they are not the main men? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLE SUPER WILBERT 2,475 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 No what? They shouldnt be on the list if they are not the main men?Ffs at no point have I said that I'm done here Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johanhentze 14,073 Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 Ffs at no point have I said that I'm done here "My point is if he was in the top 100 youngsters in the world McCoist would be making him the main man in our team and he isn't"Surely if McCoist has to make him the main man in the team then others on the list would be too....I mean, they are on the list Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.