theiconicman 2,975 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 It was mentioned on here during the boardroom wars that King would only buy shares at 30p or below.Perhaps he has a buy order with a Broker? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrongshapedballs 78 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 £360,000 is a lot assuming it the one person, which it looks highly likely it isYou are only looking at the last 5 trades there. There was another million @ 24p and 250k @ 25p a few minutes before your first trade. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertent 2,081 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I'd be seriously worried if the buyers are the Laxeys given their history as asset strippers.Think this is more likely to be Green finally flogging his shares , finally. Big question is who buys them and at what price. The market makers take their cut.Time now surely for Dave King to step in and save us as the the media seemed so keen to tell us hoe was about to do.We need really serious management and investment, preferably from real Rangers men and not these city chancers.DK, your time is now!Have you actually got anything correct in this rambling pish?If you are going to comment do your homework first Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,090 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Just a thought , but could it be one of the new board members. If I remember right I think Crichton bought shares recently. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,090 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Cancel that above post. Just realised the amount involved ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitre_mouldmaster 21,509 Posted January 14, 2014 Author Share Posted January 14, 2014 Just a thought , but could it be one of the new board members.If I remember right I think Crichton bought shares recently.Yea, but it was quite small sums. Think it was 60,000 shares or £60,000 worth of shares. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rfc#1. 1,877 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Perhaps Dave King has fuck all to do with this at all.Does the LSE not name the buyer? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 You are only looking at the last 5 trades there. There was another million @ 24p and 250k @ 25p a few minutes before your first trade.2.75 million shares bought within 4 minutes. Would imagine it would be the same buyer, but who? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Perhaps Dave King has fuck all to do with this at all.Does the LSE not name the buyer?I think it has to be a certain amount for the buyer to be named, not sure Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rfc#1. 1,877 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I think it has to be a certain amount for the buyer to be named, not sureThanks mate. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamb 126 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I don't doubt that D King is keen to help but remember that he also indicated that he wasn't going to line someone else pockets. Right now whoever is buying is not putting that money into the club but paying it to whoever is selling. Patience required whilst we wait and see what is happening. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,090 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Yea, but it was quite small sums. Think it was 60,000 shares or £60,000 worth of shares.Yep. Just realised the amounts involved , would make it unlikely being an individual. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I remember it being explained that it could also be a share holding firm, there are companies who buy shares only to seel on again at a profit (if there's one to be had).I'm sure it was something along those lines, essentially it didn't need to be an individual who was buying with a view to having in interest in the club ... only in the potential profit from the shares. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 BBC on the case so no doubt we'll find out soon enough Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrongshapedballs 78 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I think it has to be a certain amount for the buyer to be named, not sureAs I said above, if it is a single buyer it will take them over 3% shareholding (if they don't already have that) and there will be a Stock Exchange announcement. It is up to the buyer to notify the club in order for them to make the announcement, which can take a couple of days. Laxey and the Easdale group have been pretty prompt about this up till now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 If BBC are on the case, expect another load of lies in another attempt to destabilise our recovery. Unless it is PM trying to get control! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carson's cat 744 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 http://www.lse.co.uk/SharePrice.asp?shareprice=RFC It says here 2,522,438 sold and 259,931 bought What does this mean? Obviously for a share to be sold someone has to buy it and vice versa. So what's does this mean?Shares were probably sold to a broker. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Well hello CC. Wondered where you had got to. Been for M Alky's cairry oot? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 The old "line someone else's pockets" crap seems to have reared its head again, that is how shares work.Does that mean if I sold shares to King he would be lining his own pockets as he ianbuying them off me cheaper than I got them for, or why doesn't the RST show the faith they have in Dave King and sell him all the sharesbthey own at 24p.The Dave King and "real rangers men" getsbreally tiresome when it is us the fans doing all the work and sacrifices. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Shares were probably sold to a broker.I suspect that will be the case. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wearethepeople1 3,897 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I'm reading that if the shares have been bought by easdale it would take him over the 30% mark and would have to go for a buyout? Dunno if true Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I'm reading that if the shares have been bought by easdale it would take him over the 30% mark and would have to go for a buyout? Dunno if trueThere is no way its Easdale. That would be mental Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Up 4p in the last hour Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wrongshapedballs 78 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 I'm reading that if the shares have been bought by easdale it would take him over the 30% mark and would have to go for a buyout? Dunno if trueIt wouldn't, it would take him up to about 28% Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Up 4p in the last hourIs that because some have just became available then?From what I see of TLM postings, the share price falling is mostly due to the fact there are very few shares on the open market, this seems to fly in the face of us being told that the only reason the share price was falling is because the board was dodgy.so we are back to what, 29p? which is an increase on yesterday is it not? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.