Graham Wallace must shake up Rangers

[gogzy 31,195]

Three if you count their natural position.

But with Ally that's never needed

another thing they fail to mention in that article is the vast difference in wages paid to our 56 players, compared to the wages paid to their 50

[Bheast Skelper 411]

Unless tom english died while writing that, i have no interest in what shite comes out his filthy mouth.

[cushynumber 25,178]

I wonder how that compares to celtics 1st team numbers.

27 1st team players is probably still a wee bit excessive, but when you consider who some of those guys are, and how we unanimously want rid of them.....It isn't as bad as made out.

We obviously need to shed some of the dead wood from these first team players,

its not the player numbers really - though i think we could do with losing a few down to 22 - its who is going thats going to make the difference in wages.

29 in the youths and reserves seems a lot - but their wages are not going to amount to much

[cushynumber 25,178]

I wonder how that compares to celtics 1st team numbers.

27 1st team players is probably still a wee bit excessive, but when you consider who some of those guys are, and how we unanimously want rid of them.....It isn't as bad as made out.

We obviously need to shed some of the dead wood from these first team players,

cellic have 31 posted as in the first team squad - with an additional 4 out on loan for a total of 35. You'll forgive me if i dont post the link....

[gogzy 31,195]

cellic have 31 posted as in the first team squad - with an additional 4 out on loan for a total of 35. You'll forgive me if i dont post the link....