bawsburst 1,381 Posted January 17, 2014 Author Share Posted January 17, 2014 Yes ok, Ally decides the salary. Do you really believe that?I think you should read the post again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,241 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 I think you should read the post again.I read your post. My original point was about the level of remuneration not the fact we signed pish players, that was in response to your point about remuneration levels.Who sanctioned the salaries of those players playing in a pub league? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NixonRFC 1,310 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 I don't think these 'proposals' can be taken lightly though, the timing of it isn't lost on me, Rangers have one real valuable asset in the playing squad, proposing a wage cut during a transfer window wasn't a coincidence, now though with the proposal outed it makes Rangers position weaker if clubs indeed come in for Lee Wallace Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted January 17, 2014 Author Share Posted January 17, 2014 I read your post. My original point was about the level of remuneration not the fact we signed pish players, that was in response to your point about remuneration levels.Who sanctioned the salaries of those players playing in a pub league?McCoist as there are no transfer fees involved has a budget for wages and "extras", if he decides to spend 40% of his budget on one player he must deem it worth it, for it to be suggested that he has no idea of what players earn or take out of his budget a budget he controls is an insult to fan's intelligence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Rd 2,860 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Bawsburst, is it true the players are still waiting on their bonuses? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 McCoist as there are no transfer fees involved has a budget for wages and "extras", if he decides to spend 40% of his budget on one player he must deem it worth it, for it to be suggested that he has no idea of what players earn or take out of his budget a budget he controls is an insult to fan's intelligence.McCoist has no control over any budget and has no part in contract negotiations Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ace 3,556 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Oh goody, back to the fans briefings via forums now ... MediaHouse doing a bang up job (!!)Ally has the role to identify & discuss with the board, the viability of signing a player, the board have the ultimate responsibilty of agreeing (or not) to signing the actual player as it falls within the clubs budget & constraints.It's good to see that your role is to besmirch Ally while painting a glossy picture of the boards (previous AND current) in all this !! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Just to be clear on yesterday for the drama Queens, no offer was made to anyone regarding any cuts, simply a CEO carrying out his remit as he stated he would.So, no proposal, or suggestion was made to any of our players to take a 15% wage cut ?What remit did our CEO deliver upon as per his stated intention ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLawMan 6,240 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Bawsburst, is it true the players are still waiting on their bonuses?Nobody gets their bonus according to bawsburst. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bheast Skelper 411 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 He is either an employee of Media House or somebody who is very good at pretending to be an employee of Media House.As opposed to you, who is just a rhat bastard. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 McCoist as there are no transfer fees involved has a budget for wages and "extras", if he decides to spend 40% of his budget on one player he must deem it worth it, for it to be suggested that he has no idea of what players earn or take out of his budget a budget he controls is an insult to fan's intelligence.No CEO worth his salt would allow a manager to negotiate player contracts himself. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddrock 107 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 we got reassurance from Green that all this was sorted , or did I misunderstand what he said along with his then high bonus paid fellow directors Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted January 17, 2014 Author Share Posted January 17, 2014 No CEO worth his salt would allow a manager to negotiate player contracts himself.You should understand the post before replying rather than crediting it with your imagined content. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 And yet you still think Green, Stockbridge, Mather etc were our saviours who did a fantastic job!And you still think Mini and his bunch of business failures could be Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 So, no proposal, or suggestion was made to any of our players to take a 15% wage cut ?What remit did our CEO deliver upon as per his stated intention ?The idea was merely floated at a meeting, perhaps one of many.It didn't go down well obviously so it'll be plan B for the cuts.I can't understand why anyone is surprised that this would even be contemplated.I've been seeing posts for the past 6 months from all sides greeting about the wage bill being too high and the board doing nothing.As soon as the board starts on it, the snipers (not D'Art) are now jumping on them for the audacity of making cuts.The laughable part is the number of pro rebel folk who have resurfaced to pan the board for doing something they were greeting at the previous board for not doing.Board spends = bad thingBoard reigns in spending = bad thing.Back to the same old agenda driven pish by the looks of it.As for Keith Jackson today ?He has crowed smugly about Rangers needing to cut costs and yet today is decrying it.The board is only doing what is sensible and also what everybody wanted. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougie76 15,356 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 I avoid here when all the fucking drama comes outSpot on mate, It's pathetic. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getstiffed 8,863 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 The idea was merely floated at a meeting, perhaps one of many.It didn't go down well obviously so it'll be plan B for the cuts.I can't understand why anyone is surprised that this would even be contemplated.I've been seeing posts for the past 6 months from all sides greeting about the wage bill being too high and the board doing nothing.As soon as the board starts on it, the snipers (not D'Art) are now jumping on them for the audacity of making cuts.The laughable part is the number of pro rebel folk who have resurfaced to pan the board for doing something they were greeting at the previous board for not doing.Board spends = bad thingBoard reigns in spending = bad thing.Back to the same old agenda driven pish by the looks of it.As for Keith Jackson today ?He has crowed smugly about Rangers needing to cut costs and yet today is decrying it.The board is only doing what is sensible and also what everybody wanted.I never wanted wage cuts. I wanted wastes of space and wages out the door. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Smails 13 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 So, no proposal, or suggestion was made to any of our players to take a 15% wage cut ?What remit did our CEO deliver upon as per his stated intention ?The wage cut was discussed/suggested.Whether the players were all handed individual illustrations is irrelevant. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Smails 13 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 So, no proposal, or suggestion was made to any of our players to take a 15% wage cut ?What remit did our CEO deliver upon as per his stated intention ?The wage reduction was suggested/discussed.Whether the players were handed an individual illustration is irrelevant. The intention is clear. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Judge Smails 13 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 The fact that wage cuts were discussed or suggested is enough.The players reaction is telling. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 The idea was merely floated at a meeting, perhaps one of many.It didn't go down well obviously so it'll be plan B for the cuts.I can't understand why anyone is surprised that this would even be contemplated.I've been seeing posts for the past 6 months from all sides greeting about the wage bill being too high and the board doing nothing.As soon as the board starts on it, the snipers (not D'Art) are now jumping on them for the audacity of making cuts.The laughable part is the number of pro rebel folk who have resurfaced to pan the board for doing something they were greeting at the previous board for not doing.Board spends = bad thingBoard reigns in spending = bad thing.Back to the same old agenda driven pish by the looks of it.As for Keith Jackson today ?He has crowed smugly about Rangers needing to cut costs and yet today is decrying it.The board is only doing what is sensible and also what everybody wanted.Are you saying bud the idea was discussed at a board meeting but no such proposal was put to the players orSuch a proposal was put to the players by way of being floated at a meeting with them ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Get him signed, would do Llama stuff for fun up here. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,638 Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 Just to be clear on yesterday for the drama Queens, no offer was made to anyone regarding any cuts, simply a CEO carrying out his remit as he stated he would.Don't worry be happy, as the song says. Thanks for keepin us in the loop wee man and settlin the minds of us poor peasants, you meejahhoose spin doactors are the biz ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.