Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 So who would you suggest MB ?A club run sustainably by Rangers men overseen by chief investors such as King Unfortunately that's almost a carbon copy of the model at the other end of the city. E.g. Lawwell, Reilly overseen by DesmondIn summary I want an executive whose priority is the team on the park - I repeat sustainably! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Also... what was your previous name on here hendry? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Unless there is any other high court case that you know of, why the chairman ? If you attended the AGM you would know why ,that performance on the stage was a f&&&&& joke, numerous times he had to be told how to conduct a meeting by a MP who is a shareholder,failed to allow numerous shareholders to ask questions and let's not forget who is Green and Whyte wouldn't know them if I met them in the street, also the red card demo at Ibrox what was that for again according to The Chairman.AnymoreThe CoS is not the High Court, please know your subject before you attempt to exaggerate it at every turn, better still leave it alone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,152 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Unless there is any other high court case that you know of, why the chairman ? If you attended the AGM you would know why ,that performance on the stage was a f&&&&& joke, numerous times he had to be told how to conduct a meeting by a MP who is a shareholder,failed to allow numerous shareholders to ask questions and let's not forget who is Green and Whyte wouldn't know them if I met them in the street, also the red card demo at Ibrox what was that for again according to The Chairman.AnymoreI think he was taken aback by the reception the board got. What makes you think he lied about Whyte and Green ? Given his business background , I'm happy to give him a chance. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 22, 2014 Author Share Posted January 22, 2014 A club run sustainably by Rangers men overseen by chief investors such as KingUnfortunately that's almost a carbon copy of the model at the other end of the city. E.g. Lawwell, Reilly overseen by DesmondIn summary I want an executive whose priority is the team on the park - I repeat sustainably!Well I doubt King will have a better chance ever to snap up shares. Perhaps some of these Rangers men care for their wallets more than the club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendry 4 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Lol so we get rid of the chairman for saying before he came to Rangers he wouldnt know Green or Whyte if he met them in the street? Of course you know for a fact that he is lying right?You said the board was found guilty of misconduct. Prove it. The judge said nothing of the sort.you are just regutgitating the same old shite that the rebels have been spinning for months.LOL ok so he didn't know Green & Whyte yeah let's give him the benefit of the doubt, what about his other statements and his behaviour at the AGM, his interview with his local paper after being offered the job and see how he's taking the f@@@@piss.listen when the highest court in the land tells you, you have f&&&& up you have f@@@@@up big style. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 A club run sustainably by Rangers men overseen by chief investors such as King Unfortunately that's almost a carbon copy of the model at the other end of the city. E.g. Lawwell, Reilly overseen by DesmondIn summary I want an executive whose priority is the team on the park - I repeat sustainably!Far as I can tell 'Rangers men' haven't owned us since the 80s yet we need them to compete you say? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendry 4 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 The CoS is not the High Court, please know your subject before you attempt to exaggerate it at every turn, better still leave it alone. Didn't take you long to get your oar in ,tell me where does the Court of session sit ? The High court and what was the verdict. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Well I doubt King will have a better chance ever to snap up shares. Perhaps some of these Rangers men care for their wallets more than the club.The problem with King acquiring some kind of control is more complicated than it would appear.Yes, share prices are very low at the moment. But for him to obtain a sizeable chunk to give him the influence he would seek then he has to approach the easdales, Laxey Prior etc. they will name their price and it will be a lot higher than the current rate.King wants to invest his money directly into the club in order to invest in the team. However that would only further dilute and thus devalue the price of the current shares something I can't see any of the above agreeing too.In essence you see what priority King has and where other investors interest lie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Far as I can tell 'Rangers men' haven't owned us since the 80s yet we need them to compete you say?Ok, what's your model? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Ok, what's your model?Run sustainably by the best people for the job, I don't care way team they apparently support. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Run sustainably by the best people for the job, I don't care way team they apparently support.Do be have that model in place? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'Artagnan 13,319 Posted January 22, 2014 Author Share Posted January 22, 2014 The problem with King acquiring some kind of control is more complicated than it would appear.Yes, share prices are very low at the moment. But for him to obtain a sizeable chunk to give him the influence he would seek then he has to approach the easdales, Laxey Prior etc. they will name their price and it will be a lot higher than the current rate.King wants to invest his money directly into the club in order to invest in the team. However that would only further dilute and thus devalue the price of the current shares something I can't see any of the above agreeing too.In essence you see what priority King has and where other investors interest lie.It's a fair point MB - but it hasn't stopped others acquiring shares - a point highlighted by a number of journalists when it came to reviewing where it all went wrong for the requisitioners. Actions speak louder than words my friend. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,418 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 What a 9 carat tool you are and beelin with it. I feel sorry for your type. Not getting your hole for years. Must be ripping out of you. Women will smell the desperation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,418 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 tfp Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 There are still vultures with their claws in our club. There have been since Murray gave Whyte the keys.If you are not a Rangers supporter then why are you interested and subsequently involved with our club? Only one answer to that question - money and quick bucks at that.Until we are run by rangers supporters we will never compete with the rhats. If you can't see that you're blind.Err, Your kidding me right?MM in charge or else routine? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Didn't take you long to get your oar in ,tell me where does the Court of session sit ? The High court and what was the verdict.You are a fool and an ignorant one at that, still we may sport you for a while before throwing you back but draw the line at entertaining your nonsensical questions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendry 4 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Also... what was your previous name on here hendry?Craig Whyte I think then I became Charles Green that ok because I saved the club, not the fans who rolled up and bought the tickets but me the tough talking Yorkshire man. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,248 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Please don't use 'Rangers Men' as a derogatory term. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 It's a fair point MB - but it hasn't stopped others acquiring shares - a point highlighted by a number of journalists when it came to reviewing where it all went wrong for the requisitioners. Actions speak louder than words my friend. I accept that D'Art. However, why have these investors acquired these shares? What interests has Prior and Laxey got in Rangers?We have been in a vulnerable state since Murray unloaded on Whyte. Ever since then various people have came in and filled their pockets. And it's my belief at least that vultures are still involved in Rangers. All this will severely hamper our chances of competing against "them" in a couple of seasons. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gmcf 34,152 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 LOL ok so he didn't know Green & Whyte yeah let's give him the benefit of the doubt, what about his other statements and his behaviour at the AGM, his interview with his local paper after being offered the job and see how he's taking the f@@@@piss.listen when the highest court in the land tells you, you have f&&&& up you have f@@@@@up big style.You've lost me here . What interview ? What High Court case ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Do be have that model in place?Not yet but with our demotion it's been difficult circumstances, you need to give people some time. CV wise don't think we can get much better than Graham Wallace certainly. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hendry 4 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 You are a fool and an ignorant one at that, still we may sport you for a while before throwing you back but draw the line at entertaining your nonsensical questions. What was the ruling Bawsburst, you my friend are a fool but a dangerous one,but we can agree to disagree and have a coffee on Saturday before the match. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 I feel sorry for your type. Not getting your hole for years. Must be ripping out of you. Women will smell the desperation.I don't give your type a second thought.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted January 22, 2014 Share Posted January 22, 2014 Not yet but with our demotion it's been difficult circumstances, you need to give people some time. CV wise don't think we can get much better than Graham Wallace certainly.Yep, I agree Graham Wallace is my only reason for any optimism at the moment. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.