The Dude 20,026 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 If it's easy to find out can you tell us who the grass was?I haven't a Scooby nor any particular interest. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky True Legend 2,682 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 elephants stoned. Well said mate. By the way, have you seen some of the arguements re fan ownership. Puts the AGM arguements to shame. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AljayBoy 2,298 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elephants stoned 2,994 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 elephants stoned. Well said mate. By the way, have you seen some of the arguements re fan ownership. Puts the AGM arguements to shame.I try to stay away from such matters as some posters could start a argument with themselves never mind anybody else. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hemdale1873 167 Posted February 16, 2014 Share Posted February 16, 2014 Posting the guys address is scandalous to say the least. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Livi-Loyalist 46 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Don't have aclue what's happened here. Good news tho if a case againts a bear has been dropped.would appreciate a copy and paste of 0P if anybodys kind enough? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,638 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Give the Inverness One a break and reinstate him, we need every good man to come to the aid of the party! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OlegKuznetsov 10,816 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Give the Inverness One a break and reinstate him, we need every good man to come to the aid of the party!This. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themoodybloo 77 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Fuckin ridiculous they posted his address ..........This .... that is just wrong. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scouseblue 145 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Good to see the justice system working, congratulations to the WVB, his family and not forgetting the mod in question.Paper shouldn't be printing his address. I'd sue the bastards.From experience it's almost impossible to get a court to withhold an address you need a special application and even then there needs to be compelling and highly unusual circumstances as its seen to be a key tent pole of the justice system . Nothing anyone can do, it doesn't make it right it's just the way of the world unfortunately . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Good to see the justice system working, congratulations to the WVB, his family and not forgetting the mod in question.From experience it's almost impossible to get a court to withhold an address you need a special application and even then there needs to be compelling and highly unusual circumstances as its seen to be a key tent pole of the justice system . Nothing anyone can do, it doesn't make it right it's just the way of the world unfortunately .Why is that? I've never understood how publishing addresses of people who haven't even been convicted is relevant or necessary. What's the thinking behind it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Godfather 71,735 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Why is that? I've never understood how publishing addresses of people who haven't even been convicted is relevant or necessary. What's the thinking behind it?Bitter Journos Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Bitter JournosYeah that, but I mean generally. Every time there's a court appearance in the local paper they print the person's road, don't see the point of it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smile 26,600 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Yeah that, but I mean generally. Every time there's a court appearance in the local paper they print the person's road, don't see the point of it.With the internet and right tools plus facebook and twitter and the rest of the information gathering sites finding addresses is child's play nowadays anyway.It still wrong to publish it though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scouseblue 145 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 Why is that? I've never understood how publishing addresses of people who haven't even been convicted is relevant or necessary. What's the thinking behind it?Bitter JournosIt absolutely is bitter journo's . if the defence ever make an application to withhold an address for 'safety' reasons the journalists make an application to oppose that. They are the only people who care about it but they bang on about their rights to report . the ridiculousness is in a case like this where the bloke is cleared and they still report his address , I think that's when he deserves the right to a bit of anonymity address wise even though google could find the address without too much difficulty earlier in the proceedings. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted February 17, 2014 Share Posted February 17, 2014 It absolutely is bitter journo's . if the defence ever make an application to withhold an address for 'safety' reasons the journalists make an application to oppose that. They are the only people who care about it but they bang on about their rights to report . the ridiculousness is in a case like this where the bloke is cleared and they still report his address , I think that's when he deserves the right to a bit of anonymity address wise even though google could find the address without too much difficulty earIre in the proceedings.That's just it, there's a big difference between actively seeking out someone's address and having it spoon-fed to you in your morning paper. I'd bet that there are further crimes committed as a direct result of printing addresses of defendants in this country. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.