nvager 498 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 THE Board notes Mr King's comments with concern as they are potentially de-stabilising and damaging to Rangers Football Club.That is all it says. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 11,453 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Obviously a poor response but it all came about a bit late in the day so i'm hoping something more substantial will come about tomorrow Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
weehank 41 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Reading between the lines what i think the board are really saying is "fuck of dave ya shit stirring twat " Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueensEleven 1,355 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Obviously a poor response but it all came about a bit late in the day so i'm hoping something more substantial will come about tomorrowAs above, hoping for a more substantial reply throughout today! These things need put to bed early. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydebankBearWATP 877 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Yeah can't imagine that will be it, doubt dave king took five minutes to put his together, Wallace will be choosing his words carefully I imagine Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I would have preferred to see "How many shares do you have to speak about Rangers?" but that would have been a wee bit petty.Completely my style. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
siddiqi_drinker 14,635 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 King is starting to sound more like Mini everyday. That cnut has been quiet since the AGM, bit too quiet some might say. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
big dave mcpherson 95 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Its going to be a heavyweight battle between the eazzies and wise one king Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgowrangersno1 468 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I would have preferred to see "How many shares do you have to speak about Rangers?" but that would have been a wee bit petty.Completely my style.He wants a large percentage, or is it all just a lie and really he wants to damage the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueensEleven 1,355 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 He wants a large percentage, or is it all just a lie and really he wants to damage the club?No he doesn't... unless he was lying in his statement when he said having one major shareholder in control doesn't benefit the club? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guardian 4,281 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 He wants a large percentage, or is it all just a lie and really he wants to damage the club?He wants a large percentage as long as he gets them on the cheap. He will happily damage the club to get it. It's all business to him and he knows the trough is well worth it, esp if he gets it all for buttons.Do we want king spiv as the new crooked SDM ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgowrangersno1 468 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I said a large percentage, not a majority.It's clear that he will put money directly into the club, providing he trusts the people who are controlling it.I cannot understand why you would think a multi millionaire would waste his time purposely damaging the club?He's already put £20m in, does that not register with anyone? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluepeter9 5,167 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 The club does not and must not have any more reaction to Kings document - the board need to concentrate on getting a plan together and communicating that plan to us fans 120 days is starting to feel a long time tho' but the current board deErve that and everyone else should shut the fk up and stop destabilising the boards efforts - if their plan is not credible then let's have the bin fight! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueensEleven 1,355 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 I said a large percentage, not a majority.It's clear that he will put money directly into the club, providing he trusts the people who are controlling it.I cannot understand why you would think a multi millionaire would waste his time purposely damaging the club?He's already put £20m in, does that not register with anyone?Fuck me mate, is this £20m the new 28%?Buying a seat on the board of the old company, does not mean he can publicly damage the club by driving share prices down. He's attacked almost every board member since admin, he's promised to invest but owns 0 shares. He's claiming every month that next month we'll be in administration (this is the most bheast like thing imaginable). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueensEleven 1,355 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 The club does not and must not have any more reaction to Kings document - the board need to concentrate on getting a plan together and communicating that plan to us fans 120 days is starting to feel a long time tho' but the current board deErve that and everyone else should shut the fk up and stop destabilising the boards efforts - if their plan is not credible then let's have the bin fight!They can't just let the lies and propaganda take hold of our fanbase. The fans need put straight on this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgowrangersno1 468 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Fuck me mate, is this £20m the new 28%?Buying a seat on the board of the old company, does not mean he can publicly damage the club by driving share prices down. He's attacked almost every board member since admin, he's promised to invest but owns 0 shares. He's claiming every month that next month we'll be in administration (this is the most bheast like thing imaginable).Trying to force the board into action isn't damaging the club IMO.I haven't heard anything positive come out of Ibrox since this 120 review started (I had thought the fans survey was but I'm more than sceptical about that now). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Trying to force the board into action isn't damaging the club IMO.I haven't heard anything positive come out of Ibrox since this 120 review started (I had thought the fans survey was but I'm more than sceptical about that now).surely BS going gave you a stiffy? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheQueensEleven 1,355 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Trying to force the board into action isn't damaging the club IMO.I haven't heard anything positive come out of Ibrox since this 120 review started (I had thought the fans survey was but I'm more than sceptical about that now).He's not trying to force the board in to action, the board are in action. He's trying to force the share price down. Well that says more about you than it does about anything else that you're even skeptical about a survey. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tompo47 1 Posted February 27, 2014 Share Posted February 27, 2014 Dave King did not get involved in name calling he sat back and watched what was going on before making his judgement,no matter what all the usual suspects say the board have shown no clarity and lied through their teeth.Easdale beforecAGM in response to Paul murrays claim to have investors lined up.He claimed so did the board LIE, Dec 19th Mr Wallace no need for either short tem or long term loan LIE.Wallacw again not contact with Dave King LIE.So no matter what we think Dave King has made what he thinks is an informed call whether you agree is another matter.I have no confidence in the current lot whatsoever,is King the answer I don't know but I trust him far more than anyone involved just now.By the way at the AGM we had access to a 2.5 m unsecured directors loan which mysteriously disappeared and we had to get a secured loan against our assets at a rediculouse rate .WAKE UP PEOPLE. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.