dummiesoot 16,005 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Why ?Apparently the rst need congratulated for everything including taking a dump in the morning BB Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Seem to recall Hugh Dallas losing his job for something similar.No that was completely different.....that was anti Irish/catholic/Celtic.....much bigger issue! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 They should not be proving the old adage that if you tell a lie often enough, why don't they expose the truth it is very easily varifiable, it is on this page.Ibrox in the 50's and 60's reverberated to chants of "go home ya huuns go home" only it was us chanting it at the mockits steeped in their support of hunnery, unchallenged they turned it around and onto us..........simplier to put the facts out we have nothing to get paranoid about,,,but they do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 You seem to want to make everything a competition rather than being happy that fans are defending themselves when under attack.Not at all - I'm inferring that after years of self gratification and attacking the board the penny has finally dropped with the RST that they will get more sympathy if they attack our enemiesThe fact that its taken them so long to do so and it coincides with the rise in popularity of the VB and RF is not a coincidence I'm sureThey have had years to attack our enemies but they were too busy harvesting our money and looking after themselves to do itNow the cash well looks like it might be starting to dry up they have had a major change of directionSpooky eh? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 So why isn't the RST making the sfa aware of the historic facts, after all it was the sfa who ordered the mockitdome to be closed in 1941 for seditious acts amongst others ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,248 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Doesn't matter. They are happily engaging with bigots.Never said it did, just wanted to be sure I understood the tweet. Reading between the lines he is accusing the SFA of being biased. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thesins 68 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 So why isn't the RST making the sfa aware of the historic facts, after all it was the sfa who ordered the mockitdome to be closed in 1941 for seditious acts amongst others ?Yes because that has lots to do with the present doesnt it? What planet are you on? Also the whole the RST did somethign! But VB did it first! You only did it becuase of x,y z is very boring. People preaching about unity then having a go at others for doing the same thing they have done is ridiculous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mabawsa 888 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 That's shocking, there's no excuse for that at all.By responding to the offensive tweet they've validated/sanctioned it as acceptable to refer to us in that manner.Even 10 years ago that would be offensive, but in today's Scotland where jail time is a very real possibility for online posts/tweets etc, it's frankly astounding.When the CEO of said organisation retweets as a favourite , Big Jig getting done-in, then you really have to examine the underlying current people at the SFA. Seemingly a bear asked a question via the Official SFA twitter site on the response given "Hi Martin" and was immediately blocked. Quelle Surprise. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Yes because that has lots to do with the present doesnt it? What planet are you on? Also the whole the RST did somethign! But VB did it first! You only did it becuase of x,y z is very boring. People preaching about unity then having a go at others for doing the same thing they have done is ridiculous.Why do YOU think it's taken the RST years to say anything of substance about our many enemies? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mabawsa 888 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 They should not be proving the old adage that if you tell a lie often enough, why don't they expose the truth it is very easily varifiable, it is on this page.Ibrox in the 50's and 60's reverberated to chants of "go home ya huuns go home" only it was us chanting it at the mockits steeped in their support of hunnery, unchallenged they turned it around and onto us..........simplier to put the facts out we have nothing to get paranoid about,,,but they do.Heard that a few times....like the YNWA snatch... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Yes because that has lots to do with the present doesnt it? What planet are you on? Also the whole the RST did somethign! But VB did it first! You only did it becuase of x,y z is very boring. People preaching about unity then having a go at others for doing the same thing they have done is ridiculous.I would explain the correlation between historical fact and present day lies, however it is patently obvious you are a space cadet from some other galaxy.....so the exercise is pointless much like your intergalactic post. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IanCurtis 155 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 The RST has written to the Scottish FA to ask for clarification as to why their official account responded to a tweet calling Rangers 'H*n bastards'. We have also stated that we believe a full public apology to the Rangers support is required. We await a response.As a former member of the RST, as a current VB member AND as a bear who knows that our enemies must be atacked and all the internal point scoring needing to stop, I say this is a refreshing move from the rst. Well done. Lets keep the attacks on our enemies up. If there is one thing guaranteed to unite the support its defending ourselves against our real enemies. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 As a former member of the RST, as a current VB member AND as a bear who knows that our enemies must be atacked and all the internal point scoring needing to stop, I say this is a refreshing move from the rst. Well done. Lets keep the attacks on our enemies up. If there is one thing guaranteed to unite the support its defending ourselves against our real enemies. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Does anyone at the rst actually know anything about the subject matter ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 Does anyone at the rst actually know anything about the subject matter ?Yes. Using the terms the guy did is open to prosecution in this country & several Rangers fans have been jailed for using terms also open to prosecution. For our governing body to reply to somebody using the term is an utter disgrace. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WadeWilson 4,670 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 So, it seems our fans are much happier when in-fighting rather than go after outside forces.Cool. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Mr McNab is entirely correct in his use of the word "h**" as the sfa is a subsidary of liewell's office, as the more erudite are aware the mockits are the "h**" they even had a pope to prove it...if it ever needed proving.http://ifyouknowthei...nazi-shame.html Celtic fans Nazi shameSeptember 1941, the S.F.A. announced that Celtic Park was to be closed until October 17th 1941 following an Old Firm game at Ibrox. Celtic fans had fought amongst themselves and with the police, threw bottles at the police and onto the trackside, displayed a German flag and indulged in pro-Nazi chants. A front-page Evening Times headline on 6th September 1941 read 6th September read:"BATONS, BOTTLES IN GAME AT IBROX".The following day’s paper featured a letter from a member of the public who noticed the contrast in front page articles where one focussed on Russia's fight in WWII and the other on "those hooligans who bring such a disgrace to our city and our national sport."He continued, "Here, on one side, was a country fighting so valiantly in its own towns and streets not only its own battle but ours as well, and fighting regardless of creed or anything else. On the other hand, we have citizens of this country, allied to another, fighting among themselves all over a game of football."On the same day, Sir Patrick Dolan Lord Provost of Glasgow, said, "It is shameful that Glasgow's great contribution to the war effort should be impaired by a few hooligans who seem to be more concerned about their club winning than that Britain should defeat Hitler in the struggle for a better world."They should not be proving the old adage that if you tell a lie often enough, why don't they expose the truth it is very easily varifiable, it is on this page.Ibrox in the 50's and 60's reverberated to chants of "go home ya huuns go home" only it was us chanting it at the mockits steeped in their support of hunnery, unchallenged they turned it around and onto us..........simplier to put the facts out we have nothing to get paranoid about,,,but they do.Does anyone at the rst actually know anything about the subject matter ?Yes. Using the terms the guy did is open to prosecution in this country & several Rangers fans have been jailed for using terms also open to prosecution.For our governing body to reply to somebody using the term is an utter disgrace.No I meant anything about the historical subject matters, it is disturbing that people who represent fan bodies are not aware of the history, very disturbing otherwise it would have been tackled in an entirely different way. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 24, 2014 Author Share Posted March 24, 2014 No I meant anything about the historical subject matters, it is disturbing that people who represent fan bodies are not aware of the history, very disturbing otherwise it would have been tackled in an entirely different way.No. It has been tackled in the correct way by all involved. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 No. It has been tackled in the correct way by all involved.If you excuse the French it is a fuck up the way it has been tackled, the rst have done nothing other than compound the lie, amateurish doesn't even begin to describe the response. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMotor 2,208 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 While it is absolutely right for the RST to highlight the stupidity of the SFA directly responding to bigots, the op is misleading in that Rangers are not mentioned anywhere in the exchange of twats. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 While it is absolutely right for the RST to highlight the stupidity of the SFA directly responding to bigots, the op is misleading in that Rangers are not mentioned anywhere in the exchange of twats.At last someone picks up. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Are we as easily offended as 'them'?Surely not! deary me .Its not about being offended .Its about the war that's going on .Are we just going to be a consiensious objector or are we going into battle . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 deary me .Its not about being offended .Its about the war that's going on .Are we just going to be a consiensious objector or are we going into battle .What are we offended about we aren't even mentioned. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 What are we offended about we aren't even mentioned. Not sure mate but any bear doing any work and attacking our enemies is good enough for me . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickshaw77 287 Posted March 24, 2014 Share Posted March 24, 2014 Did the SFA twitter account not also RT something about hanging Lee Mcculloch by his neck or something a few years back? Utter scum and the bigots in this country think this mob are pro-Rangers? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.