thehost 11,061 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Isn't there one of the vbs on it and one of the "well known" guys from the nithsdale bus? Won't name names incase they end up hounded There are all sorts on there, some of whom are vehemently anti-board. DM (oh look at those initials!) being the main instigator, I believe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtuoso 27,180 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Will the RFFF also be expected to pay any damages if Easdale wins? If not, then paying Houstons legal bills is a pointless exercise as he'll still lose his house to pay the damages. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunk and disorderly. 14,418 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 How does Mark Dingwall define "fans"? Keeping in mind he isn't a season ticket holder, and no longer represents the support through the RST. Does he suggest polling season ticket holders, anyone who bought a ticket to watch Rangers in the last few years or members of so called supporters organisations?Questions on a stamped, addressed postcard to: Mr. mark Dingwall, care of Follow Follow, 666 Disgrace to Rangers Avenue.Fat, leeching, divisive cunt of an excuse for a human being!!! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,890 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 How does Mark Dingwall define "fans"? Keeping in mind he isn't a season ticket holder, and no longer represents the support through the RST. Does he suggest polling season ticket holders, anyone who bought a ticket to watch Rangers in the last few years or members of so called supporters organisations?Questions on a stamped, addressed postcard to: Mr. mark Dingwall, care of Follow Follow, 666 Disgrace to Rangers Avenue.Fat, leeching, divisive cunt of an excuse for a human being!!!RFFF committee member and advisor to Sons of Struth..No conflict of interest, none at all... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_onimo 20,488 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Fat, leeching, divisive cunt of an excuse for a human being!!!Strange postcode... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 How does Mark Dingwall define "fans"? Keeping in mind he isn't a season ticket holder, and no longer represents the support through the RST. Does he suggest polling season ticket holders, anyone who bought a ticket to watch Rangers in the last few years or members of so called supporters organisations?Questions on a stamped, addressed postcard to: Mr. mark Dingwall, care of Follow Follow, 666 Disgrace to Rangers Avenue.Fat, leeching, divisive cunt of an excuse for a human being!!!Believe or not he says he isn't for this.It's fucking others behind this! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoldierBlue1 499 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Disgraceful, IMO.If they think that is even worth considering they must live in an alternate reality.TH that's why I was chasing the financial transparency. WATP Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydebankBearWATP 877 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 All this shit is.going to really cause a rift between fans that is going to be so hard to repair. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Utterly shocked by this, my money didn't go into the RFFF to help a bloody idiot who can't control his Facebook page.No wonder any attempt to get info from the RFFF is meet with silence, this just stinks to high heavens and they have a cheek calling anyone inside Ibrox a Spiv. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 RFFF committee member and advisor to Sons of Struth..No conflict of interest, none at all...If Dingwall or others want to start a fund for CH then that's fair enough and up to them but to propose using a fund set up for the club and under the conditions it was is an absolute disgrace. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,841 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 There are all sorts on there, some of whom are vehemently anti-board. DM (oh look at those initials!) being the main instigator, I believe.I know one of them through a mate. His bus took united to court so I'm sure you all know who I mean Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,793 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Surely the board members of the RFFF should be available for anyone who put money in to the account. It is disturbing that no one on here seems to know who they are. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 All this shit is.going to really cause a rift between fans that is going to be so hard to repair.It's unrepairable in my eyes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,841 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 If Dingwall or others want to start a fund for CH then that's fair enough and up to them but to propose using a fund set up for the club and under the conditions it was is an absolute disgrace.The host has said Dingwall is against this. I don't have time for MD but we can't throw names about when we don't know the story Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClydebankBearWATP 877 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 It's unrepairable in my eyes.Only thing that will unite the fans is when the Champions league music is playing at Ibrox again, king is on board and we have a positive balance sheet, but there will no doubt be "casualties" Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scarkev 3,540 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 The host has said Dingwall is against this. I don't have time for MD but we can't throw names about when we don't know the storyThat's fair but I was replying to a post re his name not a direct accusation but as I say whether it is him or anybody else it does t really change my point to be honest. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,841 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 That's fair but I was replying to a post re his name not a direct accusation but as I say whether it is him or anybody else it does t really change my point to be honest.And quite right it shouldn't change your point and or feelings. But none of us would like to be accused of being for this despite actually being against it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 It's unrepairable in my eyes.Been saying the same for almost a year when nonsense started Bridges might be built but there's too much water under the bridge and too much bad blood between fans I will never forget the sizeable brain dead scum element in our support - never Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hummington 52 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 The legal action is regrettable but obviously Easdale has drawn a line in the sand. Houston has an out if he chooses to take it.Using RFFF money in this action would alienate many fans, including myself, who contributed towards the fund and possibly adversely affect fan initiatives in the future. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Al 55 9,248 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 It's not April 1st yet FFS, this is a joke, it must be. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnnyren 601 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Absolutely scandalous Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,137 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Just who are the fans who will be attending this meeting? I like thousands of other Bears who don't or can't attend meetings but contributed to the fund to help fight for the club in it's day of need, will not be allowed a vote.This so called vote should only be for those who contributed and every contributor should be allowed a vote Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creampuff 22,628 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Ridiculous. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Whether or not he gets the money now Is immaterial - it's the very fact that it's been voted on to be proposed that's the real issue for me The guardians of the trusts positions are untenable - remove them or give fans the option of their cash back Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RangersFanBase 611 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Patch that. Shouldn't of even been considered. Disgraceful from the RFFF Committee. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.