gogzy 31,195 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Easedale wont be happy till everyone that speaks out against the current board is gagged. If he gets away with this action on Craig Houston he is half way there.dont talk such pish.this has nothing to do with fans speaking out.it has to do with libelous comments and personal slander. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bawsburst 1,381 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Jim Hannah. Are you still on the RFFF committee? If so, how many voted for this proposal. In fact. how about a update on who is on the committee and how much is in the fund.You will be branded a shit stirrer for requesting transparency from the secret society that is RFFF. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nachothelegend 1,932 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 These Arseholes making these decisions should leave our Club.They know who they are.I will never buy in to any Fans Group because of this I'm out of all until the UOF Disband and certain leaders of these groups go.Fucking shocking. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,771 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 When and where will the minutes of this RFFF board meeting be available to read ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,771 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 dont talk such pish.this has nothing to do with fans speaking out.it has to do with libelous comments and personal slander.Well said Gogzy, you can hardly believe what you read sometimes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Army 4,146 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 I just read through 5 pages of support for this decision on Follow Follow.Unbelievable, Then there is the almost constant attacks on RM and its members,I also read the comments of Tak3rNo1 and have no idea how they can justify a ban for expression an opinion Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 3,766 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 I am having a baby in the summer and money will be tight, so can the RFFF pays for my 2 ST and get my baby one as well please, and could they also get Carson cat one as well? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
10pshortof17pound 2,478 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 When and where will the minutes of this RFFF board meeting be available to read ?First sensible post on this thread - surely this statement is minuted. If not, where the fuck is it coming from and on whose authority. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muirheadbear 1,483 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 This will not get voted through. He's not alone and has backing - that much is for sure.In short I would be appallled if any if that money was used for a guy who had been warned and warned and warned again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ARockit 118 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Disgrace that this is even going to a vote. It will have a negative impact on any future requests for cash, for whatever purpose as fans will believe that their monies may be used for purposes that they had not originally intended.I see it is going to a vote, does this mean that some one who donated a £1 has the same sway as someone who donated £1000? - dangerous ground. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carsons Dog 9,878 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 A wee bird tells me the vote was very very close. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inigo 32,526 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Well, at least the RFFF custodians seem to have united the Rangers support (or at least RM - more or less) for once. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,000 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 I am sure Sandy Jardine did not help set up RFFF to support A loud mouth spokesman for three fans to break various laws on defamation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 A wee bird tells me the vote was very very close.That's no consolation for me That tells me over half of that long list of panel members think it's a good idea Alarmed and disgusted in equal measure Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,123 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 I just read through 5 pages of support for this decision on Follow Follow.Unbelievable, Then there is the almost constant attacks on RM and its members,I also read the comments of Tak3rNo1 and have no idea how they can justify a ban for expression an opinion They do when it conflicts with the agenda and what's more they give you no chance to defend a comment Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,139 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Do we actually have an official press release from someone on the committee?There's been threads on here for months questioning why the site was down and how much was in the account and now we get a so called press release about CH getting funded, I'm actually finding this hard to believe.I never donated for this purpose. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Is everyone named on that list still on the committee? I imagine guys like Walter, Jardine & Ally would have abstained. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virtuoso 27,180 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 RFFF website down for some time now. Here is the RFFF committee taken from it about 18 months ago.Walter SmithSandy JardineAlly McCoistJim HannahAndy McCormickRobert RoddieWilliam MontgomeryMark DingwallAndrew SmillieAndy KerrDavid McCutcheonJohn McKeeJim RiddleIt's an absolute fucking disgrace that he was made part of that committee in the first place, but after his hacking exploits and resignation from the RST he should have been removed forthwith. For just the once, I would like to see a fans group appear where he plays no part.As has been pointed out on numerous occasions, he's the most divisive figure in the history of the Rangers support. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehost 11,061 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Is everyone named on that list still on the committee? I imagine guys like Walter, Jardine & Ally would have abstained.I'd imagine that rangers fans wouldn't rub shoulders with the likes of heehaw and the brother in laws a bigot manThen again my imagination is wrong Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 I'd imagine that rangers fans wouldn't rub shoulders with the likes of heehaw and the brother in laws a bigot manThen again my imagination is wrongI have no idea what you are talking about. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,730 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 That's no consolation for me That tells me over half of that long list of panel members think it's a good idea Alarmed and disgusted in equal measureWell,I'd imagine ally and sandy won't have a say in it. I don't think jim Hannah would either. So it'd be a list of 9 or so. Still not good enough imo Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kplfishtank 4,656 Posted March 26, 2014 Author Share Posted March 26, 2014 Is everyone named on that list still on the committee? I imagine guys like Walter, Jardine & Ally would have abstained.not everyone on the list attends meetings , Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1st_Jan_1994 4,868 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Well,I'd imagine ally and sandy won't have a say in it. I don't think jim Hannah would either. So it'd be a list of 9 or so. Still not good enough imoThen they should be removed from the list ASAP What good are them being on it or fronting it when this happens anyway Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,730 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Then they should be removed from the list ASAP What good are them being on it or fronting it when this happens anywayI think the boy said that was the list before the RFFF site was down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,810 Posted March 26, 2014 Share Posted March 26, 2014 Firstly, the RFFF was not set up to defend individual fans' in private legal battles. Will the fund be used to defend every Rangers fan in court from now on?Secondly, how do they intend to have a general vote?I don't have a Facebook account and don't know what has or hasn't been said in the Easdale Houston issue but the RFFF should not be involved. If fans want to support Craig Houston financially then a separate fund should be set up for that. I didn't contribute to the RFFF just for the money to be used in private legal cases. We may still have need of the RFFF in future as I don't trust the SFA or SPFL to have ended their attacks on us. Even if there is eventually a surplus in the Fund at the end, then we have plenty other RFC matters where the money would be better spent. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.