Leeds_Bear 8,103 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 The total currently stands at 41,292.How many do we need 50k or 100k? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
onefootwillie 1,518 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Where is the link for it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpidermansGaffer 2,552 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 All we need is 2000 Bears to get 50 signatures each on a piece of A4 - Job Done! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArchibaldLeitch 380 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Ha ha AL - we seem to be on the same wavelength. I posted my thoughts before reading yours.Getting the required 100k signatures should be straight forward with proper planning MB Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,771 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Maybe the RFFF could put this on the agenda of their next meeting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,123 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 I'm 65 and I voted twice once for me and once for the missus, octogenarians might have a problem but let's face it wasn't rocket science.Problem is there's probably loads of Bears of all ages who don't bother with social media, so weren't aware. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,141 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Maybe the RFFF could put this on the agenda of their next meeting.thats been the best laugh on here for a while Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ger_Scott 73 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 It would be a major press scandal If UK politicians were behind this.Even had we reached 100k, I'm not sure I'd have faith in parliament doing anything useful. Always felt the crown office investigation that the Murray group instigated was the best chance of getting somewhere with this. As painstakingly slow as it's going. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eskbankloyal 19,446 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 This allegation was discussed before. Why don't the RSA, RST, SOS etc make themselves useful for a change and organise a hard copy petition.We can get these 100k signatures no bother.The RST were fairly heavily in this at one point IIRC. They organised text campaigns and had ipads etc at Ibrox to help people sign the petition. Again, it was a sad reflection of the Rangers support IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Valley 234 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 The RST were fairly heavily in this at one point IIRC. They organised text campaigns and had ipads etc at Ibrox to help people sign the petition.Again, it was a sad reflection of the Rangers support IMO.First I have heard of that. Did they contact their membership? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Educator 1,572 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Share Posted April 9, 2014 I suspect that there is an element of the support who look at this just as they look at the work being done to expose the land deals corruption and go "but nothing will come of this". Truth be told there's a fair element who would rather spend their time calling our manager al sorts of names than doing anything constructive. It's the same mentality that allowed the whole situation to be created they were drinking and worrying about not being allowed to sing what they want while the other side were thinking about how kill our club and get their hands on tax payers cash to boost their club. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rangers FC 751 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Was there a petition started on the Scottish Government site?To have your petition considered you only need >1000 signatures.However, if someone is to start one on there they have to be willing to give vocal evidence and attend Holyrood etc.If only we still had D'art Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
terry739 267 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Well, I'll just put your comment down to your obvious youth and lack of tact, combined with your super powers at being able to circumnavigate the treacherous waters of the internet and all things IT related, that are the sole prerogative of the young.I voted online on my phone and my wife and son also voted, and was disappointed like many others that we never reached our goal, and yes I believe their could be a fiddle going on to stop us reaching our target. I, my wife and son all voted too...and I'm only 66!!Have thought for quite a while that there were dirty dealings at work when you think we have 384,990 likes on Facebook and only 40 odd thousand signing a petition!!. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bad Robot 21,141 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 We simply need an organised paper petition where no dirty hands can scour the count . Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gers51 2 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 I wonder if they record the amount of signatures that were not 'validated', if so would a FOI request reveal? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheKingObv 10,639 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Definitely the old cunts' fault. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,771 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 thats been the best laugh on here for a while Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.