Murtaugh 47 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 SFA fail in attempt to increase ban GIRUY Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 SFA fail in attempt to increase ban GIRUYSo the SFA appealed the ban handed down by the SFA for breaching the SFA's rules. The SFA then overturned their own appeal against the penalty the SFA dished out for breaching SFA rules.Can we just kill off this compliance officer gimmick now? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goianegra 4,682 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 So the SFA appealed the ban handed down by the SFA for breaching the SFA's rules. The SFA then overturned their own appeal against the penalty the SFA dished out for breaching SFA rules.Can we just kill off this compliance officer gimmick now?When you put it like that... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEFTONG 60,092 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 Typical..Cannae trust the sfa to get anything right. I was hoping for a "not allowed to play for Rangers ever again" Ruling tbh..Fannies.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Jela 20,361 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 So the SFA appealed the ban handed down by the SFA for breaching the SFA's rules. The SFA then overturned their own appeal against the penalty the SFA dished out for breaching SFA rules.Can we just kill off this compliance officer gimmick now?its easy to make anything sound stupid Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 its easy to make anything sound stupidMaybe, but this doesn't just sound stupid. It is stupid. For any governing body to appeal their own sanction when they are the appellate body is a ridiculous idea. Even more so when they turn themselves down. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallows high 208 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Benefit of the ban is it keeps him out the way , he's possibly the worst keeper I've seen in a Rangers jersey Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
folkestoneger 8,131 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Typical..Cannae trust the sfa to get anything right. I was hoping for a "not allowed to play for Rangers ever again" Ruling tbh..Fannies.. I think it is a given that he will never play for Rangers again as we now have a manager that actually knows something about picking a team Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_4 34,436 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Hopefully he starts on Sunday then. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz52 11,837 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 McCall has already said Simonsen will be his number oneHaters will say I'm lying. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
folkestoneger 8,131 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 McCall has already said Simonsen will be his number oneHaters will say I'm lying.I f'kin well hope you are at least mistaken Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemisis 358 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Is this the first documented case of the SFA trying to help us by increasing Simonsen's ban? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geronimoo 1,474 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I was hoping for a lifetime ban. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ally62 393 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 McCall has already said Simonsen will be his number oneHaters will say I'm lying.Eh, surely not..Who is it I'm meant to hate ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.