Guest Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 all this crap about Broadfoot goin LB is bollocks am sorry to say, he is a built CB and thats all there is too it, he hasn't got the composure or skill to make it as a LB or LWB in Rangers, wee need someone who can come forward and back constantly, and take on players and beat them and also puttin balls in the box consistantly through out the game, i dont think Broadfoot fits that bill at all and i think u r giving Ian Murray a bit of a hard time i think Murray shud be left back EASILY or mayube Papac as he seems to have impressed WS in thel ast few games, but Broadfoot i dont see doing it at all Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvager 498 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 It's good to see WE ALL AGREE in this thread!! :harhar: :harhar: :harhar: :harhar: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 It's good to see WE ALL AGREE in this thread!! :harhar: :harhar: :harhar: :harhar:It would be boring if we did mate! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gid 46 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 all this crap about Broadfoot goin LB is bollocks am sorry to say, he is a built CB and thats all there is too it, he hasn't got the composure or skill to make it as a LB or LWB in Rangers, wee need someone who can come forward and back constantly, and take on players and beat them and also puttin balls in the box consistantly through out the game, i dont think Broadfoot fits that bill at all and i think u r giving Ian Murray a bit of a hard time i think Murray shud be left back EASILY or mayube Papac as he seems to have impressed WS in thel ast few games, but Broadfoot i dont see doing it at allSorry to spoil it but I have to disagree here. I thought Ian Murray was shockingly bad towards the end of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muff 245 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 Dont rate Murray or Papac one bit. Neither are good enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steely 58 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 all this crap about Broadfoot goin LB is bollocks am sorry to say, he is a built CB and thats all there is too it, he hasn't got the composure or skill to make it as a LB or LWB in Rangers, wee need someone who can come forward and back constantly, and take on players and beat them and also puttin balls in the box consistantly through out the game, i dont think Broadfoot fits that bill at all and i think u r giving Ian Murray a bit of a hard time i think Murray shud be left back EASILY or mayube Papac as he seems to have impressed WS in thel ast few games, but Broadfoot i dont see doing it at allSorry to spoil it but I have to disagree here. I thought Ian Murray was shockingly bad towards the end of the season.I agree Gid. In fact shocking isn't a strong enough word IMO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 i believe Ian Murray can be a good player for us, dont think so about Papac i think the whole gettin form at the end of the season is just us kiddin ourselves on that we dont have another donkey, Murray has had his setbacks last season, but i think with a full pre-season in him and keepin fit and not injured i think he can be a good play for us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted July 14, 2007 Author Share Posted July 14, 2007 What about Franck Queudrue of Fulham ?A great player IMO, and with FUlham just signed Konchesky, he is available for £1.3mThoughts ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poetry_In_Blue 1,043 Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 What about Franck Queudrue of Fulham ?A great player IMO, and with FUlham just signed Konchesky, he is available for £1.3mThoughts ?Not sure about him, he has a poor discipline record so would be worried about his temperment.Where did you hear about the cost? Also Everton and Newcastle are being linked with him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 With the fitness of Stevie Smith still in doubt, we will most likely sign a left back.Who do you think we should go for ?What about David Murphy at Hibs ? He is linked with a £500,000 move to WBA or Forrest.What about Sasa Papac,looked pretty good the last 3-4 games 0f the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 I'll only whisper it but I'd have Michael Ball back too.He going on a Bosman ?I'm not 100% sure but I think so.It was much like Beasley, Pearce wanted to renew his contract but he got the boot and as a result Ball was left without a club.....I thinkBall signed a two year deal with City yesterday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 Broadfoot may be just fine at left back - big too.But if we want to be challenging for the title we need to have an esthablished left back playing there, not somebody who is nothing more than a makeshift stop gap IMO!Broadfoot is NOT a left-back.He can play left back no problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
polar bear 0 Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 Call me optimistic but Papac showed some decent signs towards the end of last season.He's bollocks, IMO.Your opinion is probably wrong,again! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davy 68 Posted July 14, 2007 Author Share Posted July 14, 2007 Call me optimistic but Papac showed some decent signs towards the end of last season.He's bollocks, IMO.Your opinion is probably wrong,again!No, you THINK my opinion is wrong, again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts