Jump to content

English Football


Clemdog

Recommended Posts

Just now, Creampuff said:

That’s not the rules.

Ref can give a yellow card if the denial of a goalscoring opportunity was in the course of attempting to legally play the ball. 

So really it comes down to whether the ref thinks the ball hit James’ hand as he legitimately tried to block or whether James has popped his hand out to block it.

 

1 minute ago, GOAT said:

The double jeopardy rule applies to something the referee thinks is an accident, he’s clearly not meant to hand ball it, but the referee thinks otherwise.   

"Where a player denies the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity by a handball offence the player is sent off wherever the offence occurs."

1 minute ago, STEPPS BOY said:

Thought the rules had been changed that if it hits another body part first before hitting arm that it wasn’t a penalty.

 

Was removed this year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, GOAT said:

The double jeopardy rule applies to something the referee thinks is an accident, he’s clearly not meant to hand ball it, but the referee thinks otherwise.   

Correct, but to be a penalty for handball it has to be intentional, so if the ref gives a pen the double jeopardy rule isn’t applicable as he clearly thinks it’s intentional.

For what it’s worth I don’t think it was a pen, he went to use his knee and that naturally moved his arm, so although it clearly hit his arm was an accident.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bristol loyal said:

Correct, but to be a penalty for handball it has to be intentional, so if the ref gives a pen the double jeopardy rule isn’t applicable as he clearly thinks it’s intentional.

For what it’s worth I don’t think it was a pen, he went to use his knee and that naturally moved his arm, so although it clearly hit his arm was an accident.

Rules are fucked up man.  For me it’s a penalty, he’s accidentally stopped the ball going over the line.  But it’s not a booking.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bristol loyal said:

Correct, but to be a penalty for handball it has to be intentional, so if the ref gives a pen the double jeopardy rule isn’t applicable as he clearly thinks it’s intentional.

For what it’s worth I don’t think it was a pen, he went to use his knee and that naturally moved his arm, so although it clearly hit his arm was an accident.

Doesn’t have to be intentional. Can be because the hand is in an unnatural position (which is deemed as reckless). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Creampuff said:

Doesn’t have to be intentional. Can be because the hand is in an unnatural position (which is deemed as reckless). 

Pretty sure hand in an unnatural position is a way of defining intent or not, although without going through all the rules I’m not 100%.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Bristol loyal said:

Pretty sure hand in an unnatural position is a way of defining intent or not, although without going through all the rules I’m not 100%.

We’re probably splitting hairs at this point, but I think you’re probably right. It’s more that the rules effectively say “well you took that risk when you put your hand out there” :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Creampuff said:

We’re probably splitting hairs at this point, but I think you’re probably right. It’s more that the rules effectively say “well you took that risk when you put your hand out there” :lol: 

They’ve certainly over complicated it! Pretty sure even the pundits at half time weren’t sure of the rules just giving an opinion on if they thought it was a pen and red or not.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Creampuff said:

Right I think I’m wrong, but I think the rule is wrong too :lol: 

The wording of the rule makes basically all handball penalties a red card, which can’t possibly be the intention.

No. It has to stop an obvious goal scoring opportunity or a goal. 

It's still in the referees gift to weigh up the situation on the likelihood of a goal being scored or a goal scoring opportunity being created. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said:

No. It has to stop an obvious goal scoring opportunity or a goal. 

It's still in the referees gift to weigh up the situation on the likelihood of a goal being scored or a goal scoring opportunity being created. 

Yeah but if the ball is pinballing around in the box it probably is a goalscoring opportunity or one could be created.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 28 April 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      St Mirren v Rangers
      The SMiSA Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football

×
×
  • Create New...