Club 1872 Meeting.

[Smile 23,645]

Club 1872 will hold a meeting for members on Thursday 6th April at 6.30pm in the Ibrox Suite at Ibrox Stadium.
The meeting is in response to requests from our members to hold such an event. All four of the current Directors will be in attendance
The meeting is for members only and will be limited by the capacity of the room
To enable us to plan the event properly and ensure only members ( as at the date of this e- mail ) are admitted please notify us if you wish to attend before 4.30pm on 4th April

[Captain Hilts 12,819]

I'm sure this will be productive.

[Brian Fantana 23,647]

Capacity will be less than 50 of their pals no doubt. 

[Pearson83 1,055]

Dress code linebrand tops 

[B1872 12,458]

Fucking hell! 

Cunts moan about them not setting up a meeting. They set up a meeting and then cunts moan about it. No wonder folk say this place is riddled with tarriers. ?

Bunch of negative wee bitches!

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

38 minutes ago, B1872 said:

Fucking hell! 

Cunts moan about them not setting up a meeting. They set up a meeting and then cunts moan about it. No wonder folk say this place is riddled with tarriers. ?

Bunch of negative wee bitches!

Moaning irony overload. ??

[Young Bob 1,360]

36 minutes ago, B1872 said:

Fucking hell! 

Cunts moan about them not setting up a meeting. They set up a meeting and then cunts moan about it. No wonder folk say this place is riddled with tarriers. ?

Bunch of negative wee bitches!

Well they could organise it in a venue that was big enough to hold the membership they have. Alternatively they could have contacted all the members and asked if they intended attending the meeting and then booked an appropriate room. Instead they book a room and say entry is on first come first served and access will be denied when capacity is reached. That is certainly unprofessional and you could say tarrieresque.

 

 

 

[Brian Fantana 23,647]

"couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery" springs to mind.

 

they've pretty much fucked it up which says it all for them or they have done this intentionally to suit their agenda, so much for representing the fans. It has become, as many on here predicted, yet another unorganised spivvy group like the RST was.

[Dazzler 2,428]

Could the fan liaison officer not arrange to have a stand opened? Plenty of seats in the stadium.

[Brian Fantana 23,647]

2 minutes ago, Dazzler said:

Could the fan liaison officer not arrange to have a stand opened? Plenty of seats in the stadium.

wouldn't suit the agenda.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 45,730]

1 minute ago, Dazzler said:

Could the fan liaison officer not arrange to have a stand opened? Plenty of seats in the stadium.

He's too busy looking after himself, and has a seat at the top table.

[Brian Fantana 23,647]

is someone bringing the deeds?

[theiconicman 2,189]

What's the meeting about? Do we need to guess?

The next style/colour of lion brand top to be released?

[Young Bob 1,360]

37 minutes ago, Brian Fantana said:

"couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery" springs to mind.

 

they've pretty much fucked it up which says it all for them or they have done this intentionally to suit their agenda, so much for representing the fans. It has become, as many on here predicted, yet another unorganised spivvy group like the RST was.

Anybody that backs the idiots that remain on that board needs their heads examined.

[plumbGER 22,023]

Hopefully the 3 board members, who resigned, are in attendance to listen to what shite they come out with and defend themselves if need be.

If not, then accurate details minutes of the meeting should be taken and made available to members.

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

27 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

Hopefully the 3 board members, who resigned, are in attendance to listen to what shite they come out with and defend themselves if need be.

If not, then accurate details minutes of the meeting should be taken and made available to members.

Should be a live stream. 

[coopsleftboot 5,412]

1 hour ago, Young Bob said:

Well they could organise it in a venue that was big enough to hold the membership they have. Alternatively they could have contacted all the members and asked if they intended attending the meeting and then booked an appropriate room. Instead they book a room and say entry is on first come first served and access will be denied when capacity is reached. That is certainly unprofessional and you could say tarrieresque.

 

 

 

"The Party Line" members will be told the meeting starts at 7.00pm.  Everyone else will be told 7.30.

[OnwardsandUpwards 834]

2 hours ago, B1872 said:

Fucking hell! 

Cunts moan about them not setting up a meeting. They set up a meeting and then cunts moan about it. No wonder folk say this place is riddled with tarriers. ?

Bunch of negative wee bitches!

Don't blame them tbh.The meeting was called because members have grave concerns about what's happening within the organisation.They also need to get to the bottom of all the goings on which ended in 3 very well respected directors resigning at the same time.

Bare in mind this is an organisation that many see as totally pointless,self serving,has a total lack of transparency plus does not truly reflect their members wishes.

Now with all this as a background what do they do?They organise a meeting that is held in a venue not capable of holding all the current membership!Really you just cannot comprehend the total ineptitude and disregard they are showing for the people they are meant to represent.

 

[Reformation Bear 6,358]

I'm not a member so the meeting doesn't directly affect me.   I wonder though how many members they are expecting.    The meeting is on 6 April but members are asked to notify if they plan to attend by 4:30pm on 4 April.   More members might say they will attend and notify accordingly but on the day might not be able to attend for a variety of reasons.  Which leaves the question.......if more members turn up than the capacity of the room members would presumably be turned away if the room was already at full capacity.   Which would be a bit unfortunate to say the least, especially if they had travelled to Glasgow specially for the meeting.    The notification for the meeting doesn't say it but presumably its members admitted on a first come / first served basis until the room is full.   The notification also doesn't make it clear whether a member would only be admitted if they have pre-notified that they plan to attend so names are checked against a list and then admitted and if name is not on list then only admitted if capacity of the room permits?  

On the one hand the arrangement could lead to quite a bit of chaos if more members turn up than the room can hold, or if members turn up but have not pre-notified 1872 that they plan to do so.    On the other hand maybe the confidence of the current directors is such that they don't expect to fill the room in which case any issues about more attending than can be accommodated or members attending and expecting to be admitted without pre-notifying 1872 are redundant. 

Wonder if King's offer to buy shares will be discussed.   Presumably 1872 will have to canvass members for their views on whether to sell .....or perhaps that sort of decision is already delegated to the current directors to take.

 

[Smile 23,645]

2 hours ago, theiconicman said:

What's the meeting about? Do we need to guess?

The next style/colour of lion brand top to be released?

 

Three board members have resigned, what do you think it will be about.?

[KeyserSoze 9,443]

30 minutes ago, Reformation Bear said:

I'm not a member so the meeting doesn't directly affect me.   I wonder though how many members they are expecting.    The meeting is on 6 April but members are asked to notify if they plan to attend by 4:30pm on 4 April.   More members might say they will attend and notify accordingly but on the day might not be able to attend for a variety of reasons.  Which leaves the question.......if more members turn up than the capacity of the room members would presumably be turned away if the room was already at full capacity.   Which would be a bit unfortunate to say the least, especially if they had travelled to Glasgow specially for the meeting.    The notification for the meeting doesn't say it but presumably its members admitted on a first come / first served basis until the room is full.   The notification also doesn't make it clear whether a member would only be admitted if they have pre-notified that they plan to attend so names are checked against a list and then admitted and if name is not on list then only admitted if capacity of the room permits?  

On the one hand the arrangement could lead to quite a bit of chaos if more members turn up than the room can hold, or if members turn up but have not pre-notified 1872 that they plan to do so.    On the other hand maybe the confidence of the current directors is such that they don't expect to fill the room in which case any issues about more attending than can be accommodated or members attending and expecting to be admitted without pre-notifying 1872 are redundant. 

Wonder if King's offer to buy shares will be discussed.   Presumably 1872 will have to canvass members for their views on whether to sell .....or perhaps that sort of decision is already delegated to the current directors to take.

 

 as you say, it doesn't directly affect you 

[siddiqi_drinker 14,633]

3 hours ago, plumbGER said:

Hopefully the 3 board members, who resigned, are in attendance to listen to what shite they come out with and defend themselves if need be.

If not, then accurate details minutes of the meeting should be taken and made available to members.

 

if they cannot produce an Agenda for their meeting, what hope that Minutes will be taken and/or published.

[True Azure 1,414]

5 hours ago, Young Bob said:

Well they could organise it in a venue that was big enough to hold the membership they have. Alternatively they could have contacted all the members and asked if they intended attending the meeting and then booked an appropriate room. Instead they book a room and say entry is on first come first served and access will be denied when capacity is reached. That is certainly unprofessional and you could say tarrieresque.

 

 

 

Indeed. Stinks of gerrymandering.

[RFC Eagle 4,870]

13 minutes ago, siddiqi_drinker said:

if they cannot produce an Agenda for their meeting, what hope that Minutes will be taken and/or published.

I'm pretty sure there is an 'Agenda' just not a publishable one. 

[siddiqi_drinker 14,633]

5 minutes ago, RFC Eagle said:

I'm pretty sure there is an 'Agenda' just not a publishable one. 

I see what you did there.