Jump to content

Tynecastle FC vs Rangers


Guest Lloyd72

Recommended Posts


Rangers 1st Half:- Aidan McAdams; Jordan Houston, Aidan Wilson, Lewis Mayo, Myles Beerman; Jamie Barjonas, Harry Forrester; Trialist No.10; Michal O’Halloran (Andy Dallas 19 mins); Zak Rudden, Matthew Shiels.

Rangers 2nd Half:- Kieran Wright; Michael Hewitt, Danny Finlayson, Jason Krones, Trialist No.16; Grant Nelson; Mati Zata, Izzak Ahmed; Andy Dallas (Matthew Shiels 62 mins), Trialist No.10 (Zak Rudden 62 mins), Scott Gray.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1 hour ago, Elfideldo said:

Tynecastle had a very comfortable 3-1  win over East Stirling tonight. Looks like they have made a significant improvment from last season.

A Rangers team should still be beating them though.

FFS! How many times does it need to be repeated that this wasn't "a Rangers team". It was fucking boys supplemented by Forrester and O'Halloran.

Honestly, I give up with this place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BigDak said:

FFS! How many times does it need to be repeated that this wasn't "a Rangers team". It was fucking boys supplemented by Forrester and O'Halloran.

Honestly, I give up with this place.

It's clearly still a "rangers team". Four of the starters have started for rangers in a league match. The rest are players who are all signed on full time professional contracts with the club.  

You're trying to make out it was a team of 14 year old ball boys. It wasn't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, gsa said:

It's clearly still a "rangers team". Four of the starters have started for rangers in a league match. The rest are players who are all signed on full time professional contracts with the club.  

You're trying to make out it was a team of 14 year old ball boys. It wasn't. 

You're apparently trying to make out that even if it was a team of 14 year olds and four of them had miraculously started a game for the first team it'd still be a Rangers team.

Two of those four starters wouldn't have been near the first team if it hadn't been for injuries and Forester and O'Halloran are surplus to requirements and have allegedly shown a lack of work ethic before.

For the record, I'd have liked to have seen the supposed future stars beat a Junior team. But I'm not really overly fussed about a pre-season friendly involving our U-20s. However, for whatever ludicrous reason, "fans" like you seem to be using this as ammo against the first team. It really is incredible.

I read one halfwit's post earlier claiming that 6 of our new players were playing in that game!

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said:

You seem angry.

More annoyed than angry. In general people pay little to no attention to the Under 20's and put very little faith in friendly results. Therefore why are Rangers fans using the Under 20's, sorry, the Under 20's supplemented by those titans of the game Michael O'Halloran and Harry Forester (who hardly have 10 starts between them), getting beaten in a friendly as some reflection on the First Team?

It's the kind of thing a bheast would come away with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, BigDak said:

More annoyed than angry. In general people pay little to no attention to the Under 20's and put very little faith in friendly results. Therefore why are Rangers fans using the Under 20's, sorry, the Under 20's supplemented by those titans of the game Michael O'Halloran and Harry Forester (who hardly have 10 starts between them), getting beaten in a friendly as some reflection on the First Team?

It's the kind of thing a bheast would come away with.

IT WAS A RANGERS TEAM AND THE RESULT WAS A REFLECTION OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AND WAS FUCKING UNACCEPTABLE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, BigDak said:

FFS! How many times does it need to be repeated that this wasn't "a Rangers team". It was fucking boys supplemented by Forrester and O'Halloran.

Honestly, I give up with this place.

The poster goes to all the Youth games i think he will have an idea of what to expect from Rangers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OneDavidCooper said:

IT WAS A RANGERS TEAM AND THE RESULT WAS A REFLECTION OF WHAT IS HAPPENING AND WAS FUCKING UNACCEPTABLE.

Please explain how it is a reflection on what's happening? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 12/07/2017 at 8:15 AM, BigDak said:

More annoyed than angry. In general people pay little to no attention to the Under 20's and put very little faith in friendly results. Therefore why are Rangers fans using the Under 20's, sorry, the Under 20's supplemented by those titans of the game Michael O'Halloran and Harry Forester (who hardly have 10 starts between them), getting beaten in a friendly as some reflection on the First Team?

It's the kind of thing a bheast would come away with.

Think you answered your own question in your last line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 28 April 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      St Mirren v Rangers
      The SMiSA Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football

×
×
  • Create New...