Danny 9 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Both (alleged) to have said the same thing; they'll leave if they don't get to play.Yet Buffel gets chastised for it (where there's no proof he even said it) where Rae gets no criticism at all and is confirmed to have said it. Funny that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1690 Posts 71 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Got some link to the chastisement? Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueSuedeSambas 56,337 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Maybe people say that because Buffell should be a more important player for us and people would like him to show his undoubted talent on a more regular basis. Rae on the other hand has been nothing but a bit part player for the three years he has been with us and his contract is up anyway. The situations are the same but the reasons why are completely different. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfc72 0 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Both (alleged) to have said the same thing; they'll leave if they don't get to play.Yet Buffel gets chastised for it (where there's no proof he even said it) where Rae gets no criticism at all and is confirmed to have said it. Funny that. Am not Buffels biggest fan or Raes but a think all that has gone on 2day makes it more bafflin because as u say Danny Rae has said he wants to go yet hes been given the captaincy now what is that all about there is so much confusion between us all that an official and proper statement has to come out now and not 2morow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1690 Posts 71 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Maybe people say that because Buffell should be a more important player for us and people would like him to show his undoubted talent on a more regular basis. Rae on the other hand has been nothing but a bit part player for the three years he has been with us and his contract is up anyway. The situations are the same but the reasons why are completely different. I think to be fair to Rae he's been injured for much of that time.You get the feeling that Buffel could be so much more. If he was consistent he'd be worth ?8 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 Got some link to the chastisement? Thanks. Haha.HAHAHAHAHA.You're clearly not on this board much.Look around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1690 Posts 71 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Got some link to the chastisement? Thanks.Haha.HAHAHAHAHA.You're clearly not on this board much.Look around. Been off due to illness, not amusing but there you go. Since it happened recently I thought it may have been fresh in your memory but then it may be last nights excesses! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny 9 Posted January 1, 2007 Author Share Posted January 1, 2007 Been off due to illness, not amusing but there you go. Since it happened recently I thought it may have been fresh in your memory but then it may be last nights excesses! Had no idea. Hope you're ok and it's nothing serious.But yeah, just have a look around. He got slaughtered. Not a word about Rae. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadianGer 1 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Both (alleged) to have said the same thing; they'll leave if they don't get to play.Yet Buffel gets chastised for it (where there's no proof he even said it) where Rae gets no criticism at all and is confirmed to have said it. Funny that. Nothing surprising about the fact that Rae says he wants to leave and nobody cares less. The guy barely plays for us. As for Buffel, I think as far as many people are concerned, if he wants to be in the team he should be proving it by performances. Of course, whether or not he did make any demands is in doubt. Rae's remarks were not presented in the language of a demand but more like "well, if I can't get first team football here, I should move on", which I think is understandable.So we are left with the surprising thing that Rae is suddenly captain material after barely appearing for us and after newspaper stories indicated that he is unlikely to stay at Ibrox. I don't think it makes sense to anyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Because Raes pish and no-one gives 2 shits about him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott-RFC 308 Posted January 1, 2007 Share Posted January 1, 2007 Oh waitThats our new club captain im talking about Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts