Posting news articles on Rangers Media

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

1 hour ago, Johnny Dangerously said:

Fuck off, you boring cunt.

How erudite! 

[Johnny Dangerously 7,562]

2 minutes ago, Bluepeter9 said:

How erudite! 

You intellectual heavyweight you.

Bellend

[Bluepeter9 5,167]

5 minutes ago, Johnny Dangerously said:

You intellectual heavyweight you.

Bellend

Ouch that nearly hurt.  

[Johnny Dangerously 7,562]

Just now, Bluepeter9 said:

Ouch that nearly hurt.  

Ouch? How erudite.

Thick cunt!

[KeyserSoze 14,521]

37 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said:

It isn't. I'm glad we've cleared this up though, it means you can now stop posting hashtags as they mean nothing on here.

Have a wonderful day x

#youtellhim

[OneDavidCooper 2,505]

#fucktwitter

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

6 hours ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

It's own thread not sub forum like Boardroom and Finance.

So how would that work? A pinned thread in the BD dedicated to the Record?

[Smile 26,600]

Just put Daily Record in the swear filter options and the jobs done. there seems to be no appetite for this though from the current Moderators and Admin.

[Bad Robot 21,141]

53 minutes ago, Ger_onimo said:

So how would that work? A pinned thread in the BD dedicated to the Record?

Looking at the poll, the consensus seems to be a pinned thread for all negative articles and not just the record.

 

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

5 minutes ago, Bad Robot said:

Looking at the poll, the consensus seems to be a pinned thread for all negative articles and not just the record.

 

Yeah, an equally bizarre idea. And the consensus is irrelevant, it's the people who would have to spend their lives moving posts and banning people who will decide.

[Bad Robot 21,141]

2 minutes ago, Ger_onimo said:

Yeah, an equally bizarre idea. And the consensus is irrelevant, it's the people who would have to spend their lives moving posts and banning people who will decide.

I agree it's the mods and admin to decide but surely if it doesn't happen then it's the tail wagging the dog?

 

[OneDavidCooper 2,505]

Just don't buy the cunting thing

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,624]

1 hour ago, Ger_onimo said:

So how would that work? A pinned thread in the BD dedicated to the Record?

A pinned thread at the top or bottom of the first page. Or in general sports. Whatever. It should be one thread for all Rhebel articles keeping the BD threads free of them.

 

[Smile 26,600]

16 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

A pinned thread at the top or bottom of the first page. Or in general sports. Whatever. It should be one thread for all Rhebel articles keeping the BD threads free of them.

 

Also would be good as we could give them some stick in there as well for being Rebel Sympathizers.

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

10 minutes ago, Smile said:

Also would be good as we could give them some stick in there as well for being Rebel Sympathizers.

So we'd all still go into the thread dedicated to the Record?

[OneDavidCooper 2,505]

Lol, this is all academic anyway as Admin have stated on the thread that they are happy with current policy.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,624]

Just now, Ger_onimo said:

So we'd all still go into the thread dedicated to the Record?

If you want. Some folk tend to think you should k ow what the enemy is saying. It would be primarily for anti Rangers articles. One copy and paste, no links.  Keeps it all neat and tidy, those that want to can read the articles, those who aren't interested can steer clear in BD. Supports the 1872 message. 

We could even title it "The Boycotted Rag thread" so as to not even mention their name in the BD? ?

 

[Smile 26,600]

14 minutes ago, Ger_onimo said:

So we'd all still go into the thread dedicated to the Record?

The downside is that upside is we can have a laugh as the various idiots try to explain how impartial it is.

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

20 minutes ago, Smile said:

The downside is that upside is we can have a laugh as the various idiots try to explain how impartial it is.

So exactly the same as now then?

[Smile 26,600]

Just now, Ger_onimo said:

So exactly the same as now then?

In general sports in a special area away from the bear's den. either that or swear filter option.

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,624]

38 minutes ago, Ger_onimo said:

So we'd all still go into the thread dedicated to the Record?

Ideally it wouldn't be thread after thread in the BD. It would be articles contained within one thread that people would have to go looking for.

But you know that.

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

4 minutes ago, Smile said:

In general sports in a special area away from the bear's den. either that or swear filter option.

So a thread entirely about Rangers, incorrectly placed in general sports, where Rangers fans can argue and insult each other?

It's an horrendous idea, but thankfully there's zero chance of it happening.

[Smile 26,600]

Just now, Ger_onimo said:

So a thread entirely about Rangers, incorrectly placed in general sports, where Rangers fans can argue and insult each other?

It's an horrendous idea, but thankfully there's zero chance of it happening.

It's an awful paper so should be treated with the contempt it deserves I have no problem with that.

[Ger_onimo 20,488]

5 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Ideally it wouldn't be thread after thread in the BD. It would be articles contained within one thread that people would have to go looking for.

But you know that.

They wouldn't have to look very hard if it was pinned.

It just gives the impression that some posters don't believe that other posters can be trusted to decide for themselves what they read or what links they click on.

[Smile 26,600]

6 minutes ago, Sportingintegritymyarse said:

Ideally it wouldn't be thread after thread in the BD. It would be articles contained within one thread that people would have to go looking for.

But you know that.

This guy sounds like he's on their payroll.