sandyinroyalblue 16,478 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 11 minutes ago, the goal machine said: Didn't think it was a penalty at all. What drugs are you on? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Reynolds 3,359 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Never a penalty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 15 minutes ago, TopCat said: If we get that penalty we could have gone on to win the game. Shocking decision by the ref imho. Mate you know me .The defenders of refs on here will say it's all taig behaviour If we blame the refs .They are all honest mistakes with these turkeys Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven33jackie 1,920 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 The David Tanner stand in asks Lovenkrands & Commons, why didn't the ref give a penalty.. answer because he shat it luv. He would of been worried about a Liewell petition against him in behalf of all 42 SPFL clubs. Shocking decision from a poor ref.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMexican 204 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Even if we had scored then I still believe we would have conceded a few. They almost scored a few in the first 5 minutes. 2-0 going on 6. We should have scored with Morelos header but didn't create much else. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 minute ago, BlueMexican said: Even if we had scored then I still believe we would have conceded a few. They almost scored a few in the first 5 minutes. Not the fucking point. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,801 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 6 minutes ago, sandyinroyalblue said: What drugs are you on? Morelos completely initiates the contact. There's such a tarrier like desperation to claim we've been robbed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cedrick 8,048 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Not allowed to give a penalty against them Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougie76 15,359 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 It's clear obstruction so it's a penalty, doesn't matter if Morelos makes the most of it or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandyinroyalblue 16,478 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Just now, the goal machine said: Morelos completely initiates the contact. There's such a tarrier like desperation to claim we've been robbed. He's lifted his knee to make sure Morelos cant get by him, thats a penalty. And you can highlight poor refereeing without being a tarrier. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 26 minutes ago, heathen fish boy said: Would you give it and put your home and family in danger? That's the problem refs face with that shower financial problems too.demotion to championship costs the refs over 600 quid these days .Timmy screams louder at decisions against them even when we get correct penalties like Motherwell the refs get vilified Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jintybear 8,536 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 33 minutes ago, TopCat said: If we get that penalty we could have gone on to win the game. Shocking decision by the ref imho. Totally. If we are given it it's a game changer. It gives the player belief and rattles them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TopCat 4,511 Posted September 23, 2017 Author Share Posted September 23, 2017 1 minute ago, sandyinroyalblue said: He's lifted his knee to make sure Morelos cant get by him, thats a penalty. And you can highlight poor refereeing without being a tarrier. This all day long. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prso's headband 35,428 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 It isn't a stonewaller but in the laws of the game it is a penalty Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
onefootwillie 1,518 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 It's a penalty but Thomson would never give it . It was also no surprise that the first person he booked was a Morelos . There was a lot that went on that he should have dealt with but did not . That is not an excuse just a fact . Unfortunately they were the better team Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alves70 393 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 The first goal was always going to be vital we get the penalty and convert it then they have to push on and we play on the counter. Some might say it's an excuse to blame Refs but they've definitely influenced games in a negative way for us this season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,801 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 Just now, sandyinroyalblue said: He's lifted his knee to make sure Morelos cant get by him, thats a penalty. And you can highlight poor refereeing without being a tarrier. No it isn't. Lifting your knee is not a foul, if we gave away a penalty because someone did that, we'd quite rightly be going mental. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarcheVinny 1,003 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 50 Dembele dollars to whoever can supply me with the correct origins of the phrase 'stonewall penalty'. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TopCat 4,511 Posted September 23, 2017 Author Share Posted September 23, 2017 28 minutes ago, Frank Reynolds said: Never a penalty. Rubbish. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I would be livid if that got given against us. I don't think it's a pen. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dougie76 15,359 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 6 minutes ago, the goal machine said: No it isn't. Lifting your knee is not a foul, if we gave away a penalty because someone did that, we'd quite rightly be going Morelos just clatters into him it's a penalty, just because he evades the collection doesn't stop it from being a penalty He went straight across his path and blocked him so soft or not it's still a penalty, Morelos should just have clatterd the cunt Albert style instead of trying to avoid contact. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magic8ball 27,901 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 10 minutes ago, John Eric Bartholomew said: 50 Dembele dollars to whoever can supply me with the correct origins of the phrase 'stonewall penalty'. 50 dembelle dollars.couldnt even buy a can of dragon soop with that ffs Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy 69 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 When it was live the fact that Morelos was able to get a touch to it made me think pen. The defender made a genuine attempt to win the ball and missed it but Morelos was far too happy to go over his knee he has taken another step after the touch. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,005 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 I remember a couple of years ago a ref was describing a situation could arise when there has been no contact, basically causing someone to break their stride by hurdling a tackle with no defensive touch on the ball, a penalty could still be given. This situation is even clearer as there is contact. Clear penalty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the goal machine 7,801 Posted September 23, 2017 Share Posted September 23, 2017 2 minutes ago, dougie76 said: He went straight across his path and blocked him so soft or not it's still a penalty, Morelos should just have clatterd the cunt Albert style instead of trying to avoid contact. If it were to be given for that, it still wouldn't be a penalty. It would be an indirect free kick in the box. http://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/soccer/running-the-rule-whatever-happened-to-indirect-free-kicks-in-the-box-for-obstruction-325037.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.