Jump to content

3-5-2


BridgeIsBlue

Recommended Posts

3 centre backs

McCrorie 

Tavernier Docherty/Goss Murphy 

Dorrans 

Morelos Cummings 

 

Currently we play a system where we have two players that are encouraged to get forward as much as possible, but when required to defend the both of them are way below par. 

We lost that game yesterday because of a powerpuff midfield that were completely ran over. 

3-5-2 is incredibly flexible as at any given time during a match we could switch to 4-4-2,4-5-1 or even 4-3-3 depending on the nature of the game being played. 

It gives us the benefit of not being swamped in midfield, and also sees us playing with two strikers up front which we should be doing 90% of the time anyway. 

So why wouldn't it work? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, BridgeIsBlue said:

3 centre backs

McCrorie 

Tavernier Docherty Goss Murphy 

Dorrans 

Morelos Cummings 

 

Currently we play a system where we have two players that are encouraged to get forward as much as possible, but when required to defend the both of them are way below par. 

We lost that game yesterday because of a powerpuff midfield that were completely ran over. 

3-5-2 is incredibly flexible as at any given time during a match we could switch to 4-4-2,4-5-1 or even 4-3-3 depending on the nature of the game being played. 

It gives us the benefit of not being swamped in midfield, and also sees us playing with two strikers up front which we should be playing with 90% of the time anyway. 

So why wouldn't it work? 

Thing is a decent manager should be able to change formations on the fly during the game. 

 

The team u posted could easily start out with yesterday's formation and adapt to any formation you mentioned If the manager had the tactical know how to do so.  Going 3-5-2 may well be the best formation for our players unfortunately we can't or won't adapt during the game to suit accordingly

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

3 centre backs

McCrorie 

Tavernier Docherty Goss Murphy 

Dorrans 

Morelos Cummings 

 

Currently we play a system where we have two players that are encouraged to get forward as much as possible, but when required to defend the both of them are way below par. 

We lost that game yesterday because of a powerpuff midfield that were completely ran over. 

3-5-2 is incredibly flexible as at any given time during a match we could switch to 4-4-2,4-5-1 or even 4-3-3 depending on the nature of the game being played. 

It gives us the benefit of not being swamped in midfield, and also sees us playing with two strikers up front which we should be playing with 90% of the time anyway. 

So why wouldn't it work? 

We not going to have a keeper?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rabc10000 said:

Thing is a decent manager should be able to change formations on the fly during the game. 

 

The team u posted could easily start out with yesterday's formation and adapt to any formation you mentioned If the manager had the tactical know how to do so.  Going 3-5-2 may well be the best formation for our players unfortunately we can't or won't adapt during the game to suit accordingly

I admit we can't play it atm because McCrorie and Dorrans are still injured but nearing a return. 

It's something we should look at when they return. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

 

          McCrorie  Alves  Bates

Tavernier Docherty Dorrans John 

                         Murphy

               Morelos Cummings 

 

Currently we play a system where we have two players that are encouraged to get forward as much as possible, but when required to defend the both of them are way below par. 

We lost that game yesterday because of a powerpuff midfield that were completely ran over. 

3-5-2 is incredibly flexible as at any given time during a match we could switch to 4-4-2,4-5-1 or even 4-3-3 depending on the nature of the game being played. 

It gives us the benefit of not being swamped in midfield, and also sees us playing with two strikers up front which we should be playing with 90% of the time anyway. 

So why wouldn't it work? 

Would rather see this when everyone’s fit 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we need to do something like this in all honesty as you seen again yesterday the full backs missing when Hibs hit the flanks and we were bullied in midfield again so we need to get a grip on they areas so 5 in midfield with a good balance is essential as is 2 playing up front in a partnership 

that is actually my main gripe with Murty the fact he’s waxed lyrical about Cummings but never plays him playing the formation like we do on days like yesterday when Hibs set up that way leaves Morelos isolated we need a 2 man strikeforce without question 

only thing though I’d have McCrorie in the middle of midfield not defence we need his presence in there 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As much as I like the 3-5-2 I don't think we could pull it off.  Most teams that play a 3-5-2 have two players with real dig in front of the defence.  We don't have those type of players right now and we can't seem to win the midfield battles.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

Only thing I would change with yours is Murphy on the left and Dorrans playing behind the two strikers. 

Think Murphy would do better down the middle so he doesn’t need to worry about tracking back and not sure how effective he’d be as a wingback, don’t think Dorrans is an attacking midfielder either imo he’s better dictating play from deep with someone like Docherty next to him doing his running.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Siwel said:

We don’t play a 433 we play a 4231 or a 4411

You can mix up the numbers all you want. 

We don’t play with 3 midfielders in the middle of the pitch. Yesterday we had Goss and Holt, Candieas and Murphy play wide and never tuck in and Windass plays more as a front man

When we come up against a team that does play a 4-2-3-1 they run over the top of us. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Siwel said:

Think Murphy would do better down the middle so he doesn’t need to worry about tracking back and not sure how effective he’d be as a wingback, don’t think Dorrans is an attacking midfielder either imo he’s better dictating play from deep with someone like Docherty next to him doing his running.

Disagree with Dorrans, he's got goals in him and would be wasteful if we continued to play him in centre midfield. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 15 September 2024 11:00 Until 13:00
      0  
      Dundee United v Rangers
      CalForth Construction Arena at Tannadice Park
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football
×
×
  • Create New...