The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 4 minutes ago, backup said: Is there a link for Green's we couldn't challenge it, thanks. Said at the same Supporters meeting that he brought up orange kits and the Dallas cowboys Iirc Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,738 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Just now, The Dude said: Said at the same Supporters meeting that he brought up orange kits and the Dallas cowboys Iirc Have a look on @bawsburst profile. And look down the posts that are viewable on his account. See if you notice anything..... BridgeIsBlue and The Dude 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Rfc52 said: Have a look on @bawsburst profile. And look down the posts that are viewable on his account. See if you notice anything..... I’m not one for believing in coincidence... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,738 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Just now, The Dude said: I’m not one for believing in coincidence... Can't be him The Dude 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The Dude said: Said at the same Supporters meeting that he brought up orange kits and the Dallas cowboys Iirc I do remember green saying the below though. "What I'm doing is using free speech to tell the fans exactly what has happened and I am now on disrepute charges for matters of fact. "The words that seem to have upset the SFA so much are that 'the SPL appoint the jury, set the outcome and set the punishment before the trial' - those things are true and I stand by them. "Whether or not the commission works to that agenda remains to be seen, but let's be clear there was a predetermined outcome. "What I do have an issue with is the fact that the SPL has relentlessly been pursuing a fixed and predetermined agenda on EBTs from the moment they realised that they would not be able to get Rangers back into the SPL without a fan revolt. "Until that moment, the SPL were looking to trade SPL status for an admission of guilt on EBTs and a sanction of stripped titles. We couldn't and didn't give them that. "If their chief Eexecutive and lawyers were drafting agreements that contained definitions of titles that would be stripped in late June/early July long before a commission was even thought about, how can anyone say they are not pursuing an agenda and a predetermined outcome? "I would ask the SFA and the SPL to release the first draft of the five-way agreement put together by their lawyers to reveal all of the sanctions. Stripping of titles was definitely within that document. "In terms of this commission, if the SPL agenda prevails then Rangers will be found guilty and being found guilty we will lose five titles." "What I said before is that this commission is not independent because the SPL have set it up. Saying that they are not independent is not saying that they are not impartial. "That's what I have an issue with and I will make these points when I go to see the SFA." Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, backup said: I do remember green saying the below though. "What I'm doing is using free speech to tell the fans exactly what has happened and I am now on disrepute charges for matters of fact. "The words that seem to have upset the SFA so much are that 'the SPL appoint the jury, set the outcome and set the punishment before the trial' - those things are true and I stand by them. "Whether or not the commission works to that agenda remains to be seen, but let's be clear there was a predetermined outcome. "What I do have an issue with is the fact that the SPL has relentlessly been pursuing a fixed and predetermined agenda on EBTs from the moment they realised that they would not be able to get Rangers back into the SPL without a fan revolt. "Until that moment, the SPL were looking to trade SPL status for an admission of guilt on EBTs and a sanction of stripped titles. We couldn't and didn't give them that. "If their chief Eexecutive and lawyers were drafting agreements that contained definitions of titles that would be stripped in late June/early July long before a commission was even thought about, how can anyone say they are not pursuing an agenda and a predetermined outcome? "I would ask the SFA and the SPL to release the first draft of the five-way agreement put together by their lawyers to reveal all of the sanctions. Stripping of titles was definitely within that document. "In terms of this commission, if the SPL agenda prevails then Rangers will be found guilty and being found guilty we will lose five titles." "What I said before is that this commission is not independent because the SPL have set it up. Saying that they are not independent is not saying that they are not impartial. "That's what I have an issue with and I will make these points when I go to see the SFA." That was the SPL Commission (Lord Nimmo Smith) in early 2013 that Chuckles was talking about. Some 8 or so months later. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plumbGER 24,518 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 16 minutes ago, AM1872 said: Do you have "lying" sewn into the back of your gimp suit avatar as well as well as "cunt?" Go give DK a few more blow jobs. Think Chris Graham into men only Bjs too so another customer for you there. Cut the abuse out, you have been warned. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, The Dude said: That was the SPL Commission (Lord Nimmo Smith) in early 2013 that Chuckles was talking about. Some 8 or so months later. So you cannot confirm your observation as to we cannot challenge it, thanks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, backup said: So you cannot confirm your observation as to we cannot challenge it, thanks. It was Chuckles’ observation. And I haven’t looked. Also around the same time Green and Imran claimed we were about to sign with Adidas and release an orange strip. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,738 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Just now, The Dude said: It was Chuckles’ observation. And I haven’t looked. Also around the same time Green and Imran claimed we were about to sign with Adidas and release an orange strip. And play the Dallas cowboys 1 half soccer and the next quarter American football Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Just now, The Dude said: It was Chuckles’ observation. And I haven’t looked. Also around the same time Green and Imran claimed we were about to sign with Adidas and release an orange strip. Thanks for confirming that you cannot confirm your observation of green's alleged observation, have a good day. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 minute ago, Rfc52 said: And play the Dallas cowboys 1 half soccer and the next quarter American football And mind how he claimed he signed it ‘under duress’ after the SFA ‘stole’ money from us when the reality was Green signed it away. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Just now, backup said: Thanks for confirming that you cannot confirm your observation of green's alleged observation, have a good day. Not cannot. Haven’t bothered to look. Funny that you’re the only one disputing said comments. Wonder why....have you figured out the relevance of ‘whyte was cleared’ yet? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC55 108,738 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Just now, The Dude said: And mind how he claimed he signed it ‘under duress’ after the SFA ‘stole’ money from us when the reality was Green signed it away. It's nice to see he still has a few fans on here The Dude 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 2 minutes ago, Rfc52 said: It's nice to see he still has a few fans on here He’l be Beelin now RFC55 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
big blue Fin 3,724 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 hour ago, jintybear said: I sincerely wish we could get away from this shithole. Surely the NI league would take us? Even more of a mickey mouse league than ours. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackrfc95 4,255 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 Thermopylae 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 18 hours ago, Smile said: https://Rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/notice-of-complaint/ THE Rangers Football Club (“the Club”) was informed today by the Scottish FA (“SFA”) that, after an eight-and-a-half month investigation, the SFA will not be proceeding with a Notice of Complaint in respect of the submission made by the Club to the SFA at the end of March 2011 with regard to the issue of the Club’s UEFA licence for the following Season. The Club is unsurprised that it has now finally been accepted by the SFA that the accusations made against the Club were groundless. The Club questions whether the time, cost and expense of this investigation was justified and was a good use of the SFA’s limited resources. Disappointingly, and presumably rather than accept that the investigation was a waste of all parties’ time and resources, the Club has been served with a new revised Notice of Complaint relating to the monitoring period subsequent to the grant of the UEFA licence. This new Notice of Complaint neglects to properly capture the provisions of prior agreements made between the Club and the SFA. The Club will fiercely resist this reconstructed Notice of Complaint. Unfortunately, monies that should be available to Scottish youth and grassroots football will be diverted into another rehearsal of seven-year-old debates on the rights and wrongs of events that the SFA should have prevented at a time when doing so would have served a useful purpose. It seems that Scottish Football is, once again, being directed by individuals intent on harming the Scottish game, Rangers Football Club and its supporters by pursuing a course that has no sensible purpose or reasonable prospect of success. Good statement from the club. I read it has... RES12 complaint failed in respect of the submission made by the Club to the SFA at the end of March 2011 with regard to the issue of the Club’s UEFA licence for the following Season Rangers will make a complaint to a higher body to investigate whether the time, cost and expense of this investigation was justified and was a good use of the SFA’s resources A new complaint is now being pursued claiming Rangers have breached the 5way agreement Rangers will fight this complaint all the way and are diverting money to this cause The club knows Lawwell's Res12 are behind the complaint and are ready to do battle as they have evidence that shows the 5 way agreement was unlawful. Thermopylae 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 2 hours ago, backup said: Is there a link for Green's we couldn't challenge it, thanks. He did challenge it https://Rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/green-statement-on-sfa-charges/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Sweetheart said: He did challenge it https://Rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/green-statement-on-sfa-charges/ We know, I posted it, thanks anyway Sweetheart. If refusing to sign the original draft isn't challenging it I don't know what is. “Until that moment the SPL were looking to trade SPL status for an admission of guilt on EBTs and a sanction of stripped titles. We couldn’t and didn’t give them that. “You need look no further than the initial draft of the five-way agreement. “There is reference in that to EBTs and the outcome was stripping titles but if I make a statement that the SPL is pursuing a predetermined outcome then I’m bringing the game into disrepute. Sweetheart 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dummiesoot 16,003 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 2 hours ago, backup said: Thanks for confirming that you cannot confirm your observation of green's alleged observation, have a good day. It doesn't matter a jot Tbh. The here and now is the issue. Go to war with the sfa and release the 5wa. backup 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 33 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: He did challenge it https://Rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/green-statement-on-sfa-charges/ That's not the 5WA that is being challenged but the SPL's commission that was set up after the event. 5WA was signed months prior to this. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helicopter Sundae 5,967 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 19 hours ago, STEPPS BOY said: So the SFA are using evidence in a court case to pursue A historic case.. interesting. One day their own history will catch up with them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 If anyone is in doubt about who is pulling the strings in Scottish football then this makes it crystal clear Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thermopylae 15,286 Posted May 16, 2018 Share Posted May 16, 2018 5 hours ago, Sweetheart said: Good statement from the club. I read it has... RES12 complaint failed in respect of the submission made by the Club to the SFA at the end of March 2011 with regard to the issue of the Club’s UEFA licence for the following Season Rangers will make a complaint to a higher body to investigate whether the time, cost and expense of this investigation was justified and was a good use of the SFA’s resources A new complaint is now being pursued claiming Rangers have breached the 5way agreement Rangers will fight this complaint all the way and are diverting money to this cause The club knows Lawwell's Res12 are behind the complaint and are ready to do battle as they have evidence that shows the 5 way agreement was unlawful. War with this mob really is long overdue Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.