Worral get rid !

[cushynumber 25,178]

1 minute ago, backup said:

 

[BlueSuedeSambas 53,771]

What does being “valued” at 12 million in England even mean these days?

The money is so mental that 12 million isn’t even that impressive a figure. 

IMO Katic should be playing ahead of Worrall every single week. A loan player is fine if they are clearly better than anybody else i.e Kent but there is next to noting between Worrall and Katic and with Katic being our asset our energies should be going into getting him game time and improving him.

 

[The Dude 20,026]

1 minute ago, DBBTB said:

What does being “valued” at 12 million in England even mean these days?

The money is so mental that 12 million isn’t even that impressive a figure. 

IMO Katic should be playing ahead of Worrall every single week. Katic is our asset and our energies should be going into getting him game time and improving him.

 

He's started in 17 out of 25 games so far this season. We're giving him game time and improving him.

[backup 4,724]

3 minutes ago, cushynumber said:

 

you will never dry your hair whooshing it....?

[bornabear 6,202]

2 minutes ago, DBBTB said:

What does being “valued” at 12 million in England even mean these days?

The money is so mental that 12 million isn’t even that impressive a figure. 

IMO Katic should be playing ahead of Worrall every single week. Katic is our asset and our energies should be going into getting him game time and improving him.

 

Agreed.

£12m in England is equivalent to what in Scotland ?

Possibly 500,000

[plumbGER 24,518]

28 minutes ago, The Dude said:

There's nothing which says Worrall must always play. He's started as many games in the league as a substitute (4) as he has in the starting XI. In three of those games he was on the bench he didn't even get on the pitch. Katic has started 7 in the league and been on the bench 4 times.

No, there is something in his contract that says he must play, there is, there is, there is.

It's been said on here, it's true.

Just keep repeating it, becomes easy after a while.

[ger4life_1872 29,453]

Heard a rumour that it's in his contract he must play 73% of games if fit 

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

What exactly is the OP getting rid of apart from the last L in his surname?

[BookWorm 4,119]

katic is clearly the better option but I don't feel worral has done all that bad. Still a young guy and just trying to do the best for his career.

[OhW 4,669]

36 minutes ago, bornabear said:

Agreed.

£12m in England is equivalent to what in Scotland ?

Possibly 500,000

We use the same currency mate.

[The Dude 20,026]

27 minutes ago, plumbGER said:

No, there is something in his contract that says he must play, there is, there is, there is.

It's been said on here, it's true.

Just keep repeating it, becomes easy after a while.

I believe it's known as the Lee McCulloch contract.

[The Specky Forum Organiser 64,512]

45 minutes ago, The Dude said:

He's started in 17 out of 25 games so far this season. We're giving him game time and improving him.

How many games has he started out of our last 10?

[bluenoz 30,808]

I must say, I liked him when he first came but not so much of late. And a few of his comments reek arrogance. Bring back Katic with McCauley to mentor him. However, if there is any rumour to number of games played in his contract then it won't happen. If Mark Allen agreed to this then it is wrong.

[plumbGER 24,518]

5 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

However, if there is any rumour to number of games played in his contract then it won't happen.

It's not a rumour anymore, it's a common fact.

[backup 4,724]

28 minutes ago, The Dude said:

I believe it's known as the Lee McCulloch contract.

it is known as the failed fisherman's attempt at derailment, piss poor he is at it as well !

[The Dude 20,026]

2 minutes ago, Jeffrey said:

How many games has he started out of our last 10?

3 out of the last ten (Hamilton, St. Johnstone Ayr).

 

[The Dude 20,026]

3 minutes ago, backup said:

it is known as the failed fisherman's attempt at derailment, piss poor he is at it as well !

Mate, I'm still pishing myself at your attempt to prove Ejaria had signed for us on July 1st when Rangers and Liverpool both announced it on June 7th.

Obviously they must have forgotten Dodgy Dave's plan and made the announcement early.

[The Dude 20,026]

13 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

I must say, I liked him when he first came but not so much of late. And a few of his comments reek arrogance. Bring back Katic with McCauley to mentor him. However, if there is any rumour to number of games played in his contract then it won't happen. If Mark Allen agreed to this then it is wrong.

The only player I know that has had such a clause in a loan deal (and is currently at the club) is Ryan Kent. Bristol City had to pay a 'penalty fee' to Liverpool after not giving him enough game time last season.

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

2 hours ago, plumbGER said:

If we just keep repeating that Worrall has a clause in his contract, that he must play then it will eventually be passed off as fact.

It's a bit taigy, as they have been doing it for years, but never mind.

Check this out for a laugh then... 

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2018/11/06/is-joe-worrall-most-at-risk-by-gareth-mcauleys-Rangers-return/

 

This sort of nonsense will only add weight to the speculation that he does have that sort of clause in his contract. 

[RFC55 108,794]

1 minute ago, Redwhiteandblue said:

Check this out for a laugh then... 

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2018/11/06/is-joe-worrall-most-at-risk-by-gareth-mcauleys-Rangers-return/

 

This sort of nonsense will only add weight to the speculation that he does have that sort of clause in his contract. 

Only a spastic would use hitc as a source

 

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

2 hours ago, TMB said:

Burnley we’re ready to bid £12m for Worrall not so long ago.  He’s been the England U20 captain and recently made the step up to the U21s.  He’s already played 50+ games in the English Championship and is very highly rated down South.

Getting such a highly rated young player, who we couldn’t possibly afford, in on loan for a season as cover makes perfect sense.  

 

He's not cover though, he's first choice. 

[The Dude 20,026]

3 minutes ago, Redwhiteandblue said:

Check this out for a laugh then... 

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2018/11/06/is-joe-worrall-most-at-risk-by-gareth-mcauleys-Rangers-return/

 

This sort of nonsense will only add weight to the speculation that he does have that sort of clause in his contract. 

An opinion piece with nothing of note in the content and essentially saying a player could be dropped because a more experienced one will be available soon?

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

2 hours ago, esquire8 said:

We should never sign anyone on loan that dictates they should always play. Never should it be out of the managers hands who plays or not. Hopefully this is the last time Allen takes up offers like this 

We shouldn't be loaning players off of teams that are below us in stature and quality, especially if they can't get a game at that club. 

The only time we should do that is if it's either an emergency or the player can improve us but isn't getting picked coz he has fell out with the manager. 

[The Dude 20,026]

Just now, Redwhiteandblue said:

We shouldn't be loaning players off of teams that are below us in stature and quality, especially if they can't get a game at that club. 

The only time we should do that is if it's either an emergency or the player can improve us but isn't getting picked coz he has fell out with the manager. 

Like Angers?

[Redwhiteandblue 3,330]

3 minutes ago, The Dude said:

An opinion piece with nothing of note in the content and essentially saying a player could be dropped because a more experienced one will be available soon?

Agreed, but a lot of people read papers and just get sucked in by the writer, even if there's no quotes or anything concrete in it. 

Just like this thread has become a 12 pager on the OP 's opinion which has lead to this "he has a clause in his contract" sort of stuff.