SFA ruling on Rangers re criticism of Willie Collum.

[Smile 26,600]

5 charges.

Outcome: Charge 1 - proven - £5,000 fine

Charge 2 - not proved

Charge 3 - proven - £1000 fine

Charge 4 - not proved

Charge 5 - withdrawn

[thehost 11,061]

that's handy

 

what the fuck were the charges?

[gogzy 31,195]

pay it in pound coins.  bastards.

[eejay the dj 31,964]

Looks like we have done a plea bargain or a discreet sorry " it wing happen again  and fallen into line 

[CoopsLaud 4,184]

It is an sfa ruling so no surprise.

[eejay the dj 31,964]

Do the scum have to pay back the 5 million backdated for all the times they've brought our game into disrepute 

[eskbankloyal 19,446]

Suspect we will hear about charge 5 in more detail shortly...

For reference the charges were:

Charge 1:

No recognised football body, club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA, shall in an interview, a ‘blog’ on the internet, on a social networking or microblogging site, or in any other manner calculated or likely to lead to publicity (i) criticise the Decision(s) and/or performance(s) of any or all match official(s) in such a way as to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official; or (ii) make remarks about such match official(s) which impinge on his character. For the avoidance of doubt this Rule applies (i) whether reported to the Scottish FA by a match official for Misconduct or otherwise, and (ii) where remarks are brought to the Scottish FA’s attention, or of which the Scottish FA becomes aware, by whatever manner or means. There shall be a presumption that any material published in such manner was published in the name of and/or with the authority of the person or body bearing to have published the material.

Or alternatively:

A club or recognised football body which publishes, distributes, issues, sells or authorises a third party to publish, distribute, issue or sell a match programme or any other publication or audio/visual material of any description in any media now existing or hereinafter invented, including but not limited to the Internet, social networking or micro-blogging sites, shall ensure that any such publications or audio/visual material does not contain any criticism of any match official calculated to indicate bias or incompetence on the part of such match official or to impinge upon his character. There shall be a presumption that any material issued, published, distributed and/or sold in such manner was issued, published, distributed and/ or sold in the name of and/or with the authority of the body bearing to have issued, published, distributed and/or sold the material.

Charge 2:

No recognised football body, club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player, match official, or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall bring the game into disrepute.

Charge 3:

A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player, match official or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall, at all times, act in the best interests of Association Football. Furthermore such person or body shall not act in any manner which is improper or use any one, or a combination of, violent Conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour.

Charge 4:

All members shall:

(a) observe the principles of loyalty, integrity and sportsmanship in accordance with the rules of fair play; (b) be subject to and shall comply with: (i) the Articles; (ii) this Protocol; (iii) the Cup Competition Rules; (iv) the Registration Procedures;

(v) the International Match Calendar; (vi) Club Licensing Procedures; and (vii) any statutes, regulations, directives, codes, Decisions promulgated by the Board, the Professional Game Board, the Non-Professional Game Board, the Judicial Panel, a Committee or sub-committee, FIFA, UEFA or the Court of Arbitration for Sport; (c) recognise and submit to the jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport as specified in the relevant provisions of the FIFA Statutes and the UEFA Statutes; (d) respect the Laws of the Game; (e) refrain from engaging in any activity, practice or conduct which would constitute an offence under sections 1, 2 or 6 of the Bribery Act 2010; (f) behave towards the Scottish FA and other members with the utmost good faith.

Charge 5:

Each member shall procure that its officials, its Team Officials and its players act in accordance with Rule 1.

Or alternatively:

Each member shall use its best endeavours to procure that its Team Staff its employees and its Team Scout(s) (other than its officials, Team Officials or players) act in accordance with Rule 1.

Or alternatively:

All Parties must keep confidential any information or documentation relating to Proceedings arising under this Protocol which is not in the public domain (including but not limited to the identities of the Panel Members), save where disclosure is allowed under the Protocol and/or required by law.

[sassaaaa 11,406]

After everything we have witnessed from the three bought corrupt fenian refs , this comes as no surprise.......

[Escobar 13,676]

Good to see the club come out and counter these charges. 

[gsa 3,906]

14 minutes ago, gogzy said:

pay it in pound coins.  bastards.

Or stamps. As David Brent says "it's legal tender".

[Dickie 12,905]

Tell them to take it out the money they stole from us when we were demoted. And in future instead of complaining Gerrard should run onto the park kid on he’s an aeroplane and kick colum in the chuckies.

[Junior Soprano 22,428]

Collum will get the the old firm game now

[eejay the dj 31,964]

3 hours ago, fanaticCR said:

Good to see the club come out and counter these charges. 

Where's this ?

[eejay the dj 31,964]

2 hours ago, Junior Soprano said:

Collum will get the the old firm game now

I would put the hoos on him getting at least 2 more of our pivitol matches before end of season 

[heathen fish boy 8,572]

1 hour ago, Smile said:

5 charges.

Outcome: Charge 1 - proven - £5,000 fine

Charge 2 - not proved

Charge 3 - proven - £1000 fine

Charge 4 - not proved

Charge 5 - withdrawn

And that covers his match Bonus, corrupt bastards

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,608]

Rangers, guilty.

They do like the sound of that.

[harlands plater 16,957]

30 minutes ago, Dickie said:

Tell them to take it out the money they stole from us when we were demoted. And in future instead of complaining Gerrard should run onto the park kid on he’s an aeroplane and kick colum in the chuckies.

This.Well, the first part anyway...

[Escobar 13,676]

30 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Where's this ?

Was tongue in cheek, well do fuck all like we usually do. 

[Reformation Bear 6,453]

Can the Club refuse to accept the allocation of a referee for a game?  

 

[eejay the dj 31,964]

2 hours ago, fanaticCR said:

Was tongue in cheek, well do fuck all like we usually do. 

Take it up the arse .Probably 

[Dickie 12,905]

1 hour ago, Reformation Bear said:

Can the Club refuse to accept the allocation of a referee for a game?  

 

Only celtic I’m afraid.

[Escobar 13,676]

Rangers saying they’re happy with the decision. Fucking shitebags.

[They Gnu 11,553]

What did Levine and Hertz get for his rant?

[dougie76 15,356]

5 minutes ago, fanaticCR said:

Rangers saying they’re happy with the decision. Fucking shitebags.

Bridges mate👍

[Smile 26,600]

10 minutes ago, fanaticCR said:

Rangers saying they’re happy with the decision. Fucking shitebags.

Is that true?