The Dude 20,026 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, Jimbeamjunior said: Because in the same gane both brown and simunovic got away with just as bad fouls, hibs have lost a defender for two games after the ref deemed it a booking, whereas the tarriers still have both brown and simunovic, Hibs should be blasting this at every opportunity in every media outlet, hell even st johnstone should be screaming from the rooftops, brown scored against them when he should have been banned, clarke was happy to talk about our player and how he should have been banned against them, so why don't st johnstone do the same The two things aren't related to one another. Hibs can't really have any complaints over the booking being upgraded and I don't see what that has to do with Brown/Simunovic/Burke not being cited. If they want to complain about that then great but it has nothing to do with others not being cited. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, KingKirk said: Going by our statements at the beginning of this season when we basically questioned who was running our game. played to the galleries. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Avenger 22,567 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 It's smples, the system needs binned. There should be no retrospective refereeing unless it is for an off the ball incident that the ref didn't see on the day. Otherwise the system is open to abuse as in bias as we now witness and in this backwater there is none better for it. Under the current system, it is the players who are being judged twice, as opposed to the referee's performance being under scrutiny, which is really the crux of the problem and the dark forces of the CO exploiting it. By my logic, if a player is retrospectively given a red card for any incident during a game, then surely the result of the game itself is called into question as that player should have been off, which could have change the whole course of the game and indeed the result. The cruel irony of that of course, due to the abuse and inherent bias of the CO system, we would be the fall guys yet again. The ref makes his call on the day, rightly or wrongly. If club's are odds with ref decisions they can always complain and the matter investigated, but only at the request of a club. It is only the impartiality and competence of ref's that are important. It may turn out to be a matter of competence, or indeed if a track record against a particular team, then bias may be seen to play it's part. The authorities deal with it accordingly openly and transparently. The whole CO deal is a fucking train wreck, exploited to benefit one club. Corrupt to the core. BouncyBluenose87, magic8ball, Sweetheart and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,793 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 29 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: Me too, though I'd class myself as a mid-age ranged one. 😏 Yes I would agree with that. 😁 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Supersonic 4,654 Posted February 14, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted February 14, 2019 2 hours ago, BridgeIsBlue said: We've been fucked over more than any other side this season. Prove me wrong. And funnily enough, one team has been fucked over less than any other too. BridgeIsBlue, eejay the dj, LiverpoolBlue and 2 others 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Just now, The Dude said: The two things aren't related to one another. Hibs can't really have any complaints over the booking being upgraded and I don't see what that has to do with Brown/Simunovic/Burke not being cited. If they want to complain about that then great but it has nothing to do with others not being cited. Absolute bollocks You have already been employed by the rebel way too long bornabear and Dickie 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 We are the opposite of Rosa Parks. We are happy to sit at the back of the bus so we do not shake the normal scheme of things, god forbid we defend ourselves properly. BLUEDIGNITY, magic8ball, eejay the dj and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 35 minutes ago, The Dude said: The two things aren't related to one another. Hibs can't really have any complaints over the booking being upgraded and I don't see what that has to do with Brown/Simunovic/Burke not being cited. If they want to complain about that then great but it has nothing to do with others not being cited. Well that’s a load of bollocks. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Just now, Bears r us said: It seems simple to me, but I am an old paranoid protestant. Nothing better BRU Who cares what others think man Most bears know what's going on Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, eejay the dj said: Too many hypocrites on here change their views to suit their wee arguments mate Is that aimed at me? I assume it is because he was answering me in that post. Care to point out where I have been a hypocrite? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, gogzy said: Is that aimed at me? I assume it is because he was answering me in that post. Care to point out where I have been a hypocrite? Did he not respond to courtyard bear mate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Malvern said: Did he not respond to courtyard bear mate? Yes, who was responding to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 minute ago, gogzy said: Yes, who was responding to me. It's like working through the SFA dsciplinary rules on this one, I am going back and reading posts but by fuck I think I am just about to receive a red card for doing nothing. gogzy 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gogzy 31,195 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Malvern said: It's like working through the SFA dsciplinary rules on this one, I am going back and reading posts but by fuck I think I am just about to receive a red card for doing nothing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bornabear 6,202 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 49 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: Absolute bollocks You have already been employed by the rebel way too long The 30 pieces of silver has turned his head to thinking like a taig. eejay the dj 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malvern 11,329 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 9 minutes ago, gogzy said: Yeah found the original post from DJ 5 hours ago, fuck sake that was worse than doing the ceptic accounts to hide the money to find it. " 5 hours ago, eejay the dj said: Who gives a fuck about the others It's Rangers and only Rangers that should matter to our board Since 1986 only 2 football clubs in Scotland have won the league title .It stands to reason that more decisions will be going against us if we are the only serious threat to the scum . All that apologetic shite will see us constantly trampled on from the beaks We should be listing all the clear double standards that are being used in other games and other teams ..To fuck with trying be mr nice guy all the time .. We have won no major trophies since 2011 Even SG will find it impossible to win a league or a cup when things are so clearly designed to stop us" I can see your reply was we should care about the other clubs (views) but I believe we lost the other clubs in 2012, they signed up to the papes parish and are still dancing to the pipers tune. We will not get any help in this cesspit. Blue Avenger and magic8ball 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, eejay the dj said: Absolute bollocks You have already been employed by the rebel way too long Fuck me mate, do you ever have have anything to say other than the same bollocks about me working for the Record? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,540 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, The Dude said: The two things aren't related to one another. Hibs can't really have any complaints over the booking being upgraded and I don't see what that has to do with Brown/Simunovic/Burke not being cited. If they want to complain about that then great but it has nothing to do with others not being cited. Of course they are related, its shocking inconsistency at best, had the ref done his job properly that night celtic are down to 9 men and hibs 10, however he didn't but the compliance officer only deemed to deal with the hibs boy Where's st johnstone in all of this, brown scores against them in a game he should have been banned for, Nobody is willing to speak out about issues until celtic do, its embarrassing from the rest of scottish football Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 7 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: Of course they are related, its shocking inconsistency at best, had the ref done his job properly that night celtic are down to 9 men and hibs 10, however he didn't but the compliance officer only deemed to deal with the hibs boy Where's st johnstone in all of this, brown scores against them in a game he should have been banned for, Nobody is willing to speak out about issues until celtic do, its embarrassing from the rest of scottish football It's shocking inconsistency but the all four of them from that game deserved punishment. They can bring up celtic's three without the need to even mention their own one. The Brown argument is a nonsense tbh. It's just as easily spun around in christ knows how many different cases too. How many games did Morelos score in that folk argue he should've been banned in? McGregor keeping a clean-sheet in a game he should've apparently been banned for? It's a daft point. Folk have spoken out but - in plenty of cases - if we don't agree with them we shoot it down. Look at someone like Lennon. I might not agree with him on much but he's quick to defend his own from refs. Clarke made a ham-fisted go at it last week and we rubbished him because he never threw his own player under the bus. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,793 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, eejay the dj said: Nothing better BRU Who cares what others think man Most bears know what's going on Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,540 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 1 hour ago, The Dude said: It's shocking inconsistency but the all four of them from that game deserved punishment. They can bring up celtic's three without the need to even mention their own one. The Brown argument is a nonsense tbh. It's just as easily spun around in christ knows how many different cases too. How many games did Morelos score in that folk argue he should've been banned in? McGregor keeping a clean-sheet in a game he should've apparently been banned for? It's a daft point. Folk have spoken out but - in plenty of cases - if we don't agree with them we shoot it down. Look at someone like Lennon. I might not agree with him on much but he's quick to defend his own from refs. Clarke made a ham-fisted go at it last week and we rubbished him because he never threw his own player under the bus. My point regarding brown is that clarke tried the same thing, it didn't work but it put it out there, however he's not complaining about others who should be banned, again if brown was given a straight red against hibs he's miss the killie game, whys clarke not moaning about that Teams are too silent incase they upset the tarriers, you might not agree but thats my opinion, Bears, Bears r us, magic8ball and 1 other 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Young Bob 1,360 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Shocked that the SFA have not capitulated and delivered Whytes head on a plate to Ibrox by now, Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie 12,905 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 When scum tried to get Morelos done for last old firm game panel said as ref had seen and dealt with events nothing could be done yet both McKenna and hibs player upgraded for fouls which Brenda complained about but were dealt with by ref. So who is making the rules up as they go along? Is it also not eufa rules that a referees decision rightly or wrongly cannot be questioned? I take it the Dude is now freelancing for the celtic view. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUEDIGNITY 33,647 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 To be fair at least the Club kept this toothless statement short and sweet this time. Bears r us 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EverestGers 748 Posted February 14, 2019 Share Posted February 14, 2019 Thedude is a bellend, end thread 👍 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.