Gerrard given 1 match ban

[SeparateEntityMyArse 53,714]

Just now, billscott said:

brown has been cited as well

Not for last night's incident afaik.

[billscott 2,463]

Just now, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Not for last night's incident afaik.

i never said it was  it is too early for last nights game  not that he will be charged for that

[The Dude 20,026]

16 minutes ago, Reformation Bear said:

At what point does King and the Rangers Board act?   What more needs to happen for them to wrench their ostrich necks out of the ground and actually do something positive and effective to defend the Club and players, and to set right for the record the official Rangers view of the officiating and decisions of the football authorities in recent time - those which directly affected Rangers and those where there were comparable incidents that other clubs get away with?     

How far must it go before the Chairman and the Board actually do something effective (I don't just mean mealy mouthed wishy washy namby pamby protest statements)?

Natural justice is not being done nor is it being seen to be done.   Its being applied in a situation where Rangers are officiated differently.    Its as though the football authorities have decided among themselves (or otherwise influenced) to single out Rangers to mete out punishment at every circumstance possible.   The consistency of their actions inevitably begs the question of underlying agenda.    The absence of effective responses and interventions by the  Rangers Board also beg the question of what underlying agenda they are going along with because its obvious enough to many in the Support that natural justice is being denied and that Rangers is the target of special treatment in dishing out bans.  

Here's a question for King and the Board - do you and accept without reservation all of the bans and punishments dished out to Rangers this season? - club have answered it already

Here's another question for King and the Board - are you satisfied that officiating of Rangers games has been carried consistently on an objective, fair (without favour or disfavour), impartial basis and that the same has been applied to all other clubs? - club have answered it already

Here's another question for King and the Board - what steps are you going to take to make sure that officiating at Rangers games next season is done on a demonstrably fair and unbiased basis? - club have answered it already

Note also, the season isn't over yet.   There are opportunities for more red cards, yellow cards, citations and bans to be dished out so this is not necessarily the end point for this season.    I suppose it might be possible for the football authorities to tot up the charges and taking an overall season-long view decide to charge the Club with bringing the game into disrepute with some further punishment meted out?   Wonder if that'd dynamite the Board out of its foxholes?

At what point does King and the Board put on their armour, dig themselves out of their comfy foxholes and go on the offensive with the football authorities and media?   What would need to happen to get them to push the 'actions stations' button?    I for one have no idea for it seems to me that there is nothing that would rouse them into action as fit for purpose Stewards of the Club.

 

 

[The Dude 20,026]

9 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

WTF?!

Not only trying to drive out our best players, now it's our manager.

Meanwhile, the instigators of all the mayhem at the chamber of secrets, walk away as white as the driven snow.

This board need to go to war and it is up to us to make sure they do. Email them, protest on match days, whatever, but our board cannot be allowed to remain in silence.

Otherwise just shut us down, save us the pain, as the haters are handicapping us every which way and we take it up the erse.

I'm so fucking raging, I'm lost for words.

Brown and celtic have been cited by the SFA.

[ForeverAndEver 71,450]

4 minutes ago, sassaaaa said:

Went off next to the keeper , who knows if it was aimed at him or not , but you had no problem deciding it wasnt aimed at him.

Why am i not surprised......

Because it's fairly obvious  

[scottyscott1963 18,281]

1 hour ago, BLUEDIGNITY said:

Apparently browns hearing will be held in santa ponsa !

I'll just have to watch it on Judge Rinder.
Took my kids there 30 year ago,and you couldn't give me a free holiday in the dump.

[OhW 4,669]

19 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

I'm so fucking raging, I'm lost for words.

if only

[OhW 4,669]

11 minutes ago, The Dude said:

Brown and celtic have been cited by the SFA.

He just wanted to say "white as the driven snow" again.

[G.E.C. 18,746]

I’ve never understood the disciplinary process with this thing offering bans What if they say no? Do they still issue bans regardless?

[Blumhoilann 6,712]

35 minutes ago, Reformation Bear said:

At what point does King and the Rangers Board act?   What more needs to happen for them to wrench their ostrich necks out of the ground and actually do something positive and effective to defend the Club and players, and to set right for the record the official Rangers view of the officiating and decisions of the football authorities in recent time - those which directly affected Rangers and those where there were comparable incidents that other clubs get away with?    

How far must it go before the Chairman and the Board actually do something effective (I don't just mean mealy mouthed wishy washy namby pamby protest statements)?

Natural justice is not being done nor is it being seen to be done.   Its being applied in a situation where Rangers are officiated differently.    Its as though the football authorities have decided among themselves (or otherwise influenced) to single out Rangers to mete out punishment at every circumstance possible.   The consistency of their actions inevitably begs the question of underlying agenda.    The absence of effective responses and interventions by the  Rangers Board also beg the question of what underlying agenda they are going along with because its obvious enough to many in the Support that natural justice is being denied and that Rangers is the target of special treatment in dishing out bans.  

Here's a question for King and the Board - do you and accept without reservation all of the bans and punishments dished out to Rangers this season?

Here's another question for King and the Board - are you satisfied that officiating of Rangers games has been carried consistently on an objective, fair (without favour or disfavour), impartial basis and that the same has been applied to all other clubs? 

Here's another question for King and the Board - what steps are you going to take to make sure that officiating at Rangers games next season is done on a demonstrably fair and unbiased basis?

Note also, the season isn't over yet.   There are opportunities for more red cards, yellow cards, citations and bans to be dished out so this is not necessarily the end point for this season.    I suppose it might be possible for the football authorities to tot up the charges and taking an overall season-long view decide to charge the Club with bringing the game into disrepute with some further punishment meted out?   Wonder if that'd dynamite the Board out of its foxholes?

At what point does King and the Board put on their armour, dig themselves out of their comfy foxholes and go on the offensive with the football authorities and media?   What would need to happen to get them to push the 'actions stations' button?    I for one have no idea for it seems to me that there is nothing that would rouse them into action as fit for purpose Stewards of the Club.

 

Great post 🙂

[scottyscott1963 18,281]

49 minutes ago, Reformation Bear said:

At what point does King and the Rangers Board act?   What more needs to happen for them to wrench their ostrich necks out of the ground and actually do something positive and effective to defend the Club and players, and to set right for the record the official Rangers view of the officiating and decisions of the football authorities in recent time - those which directly affected Rangers and those where there were comparable incidents that other clubs get away with?    

How far must it go before the Chairman and the Board actually do something effective (I don't just mean mealy mouthed wishy washy namby pamby protest statements)?

Natural justice is not being done nor is it being seen to be done.   Its being applied in a situation where Rangers are officiated differently.    Its as though the football authorities have decided among themselves (or otherwise influenced) to single out Rangers to mete out punishment at every circumstance possible.   The consistency of their actions inevitably begs the question of underlying agenda.    The absence of effective responses and interventions by the  Rangers Board also beg the question of what underlying agenda they are going along with because its obvious enough to many in the Support that natural justice is being denied and that Rangers is the target of special treatment in dishing out bans.  

Here's a question for King and the Board - do you and accept without reservation all of the bans and punishments dished out to Rangers this season?

Here's another question for King and the Board - are you satisfied that officiating of Rangers games has been carried consistently on an objective, fair (without favour or disfavour), impartial basis and that the same has been applied to all other clubs? 

Here's another question for King and the Board - what steps are you going to take to make sure that officiating at Rangers games next season is done on a demonstrably fair and unbiased basis?

Note also, the season isn't over yet.   There are opportunities for more red cards, yellow cards, citations and bans to be dished out so this is not necessarily the end point for this season.    I suppose it might be possible for the football authorities to tot up the charges and taking an overall season-long view decide to charge the Club with bringing the game into disrepute with some further punishment meted out?   Wonder if that'd dynamite the Board out of its foxholes?

At what point does King and the Board put on their armour, dig themselves out of their comfy foxholes and go on the offensive with the football authorities and media?   What would need to happen to get them to push the 'actions stations' button?    I for one have no idea for it seems to me that there is nothing that would rouse them into action as fit for purpose Stewards of the Club.

 

You can also add the corrupt GCC in the mix with theft and rules regarding fan zones.
The list against us from every cunt,is the length of your arm.
Some cunt at the club needs to take control of this shite.

Will add...ON A DAILY FUCKIN BASIS TILL WE HIGHLIGHT THE SHITE HAPPENING RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES.
 

[scottyscott1963 18,281]

14 minutes ago, G.E.C. said:

I’ve never understood the disciplinary process with this thing offering bans What if they say no? Do they still issue bans regardless?

If you're connected to RFC yer fast tracked for sentence which is pre-determined between Clare and the glesga jap.  

[Amato 3,016]

3 hours ago, BLUEDIGNITY said:

Meanwhile brown was stamping on cunts as per last night ! 

Only merited a yellow according to Michael Stewart on Sportscene 😂. What was his view on the Morelos red card v Aberdeen for the tangle with McKenna?

[Teamgers 1,214]

41 minutes ago, The Dude said:

Brown and celtic have been cited by the SFA.

Yeah, after they've won the fucking league! Why hasn't that cunt brown been cited on the numerous other occasions when he's been putting the boot in?

[CoopsLaud 4,184]

Brown needs to be pulled up and punished this season. Aye right!!

[bluenoz 30,807]

48 minutes ago, The Dude said:

 

Good post and I agree the board need to be heard loud and clear but when Liewell runs the SFA it will fall on deaf ears. I don't know what the answer is. Football in this country is so corrupt and the bias is not even hidden. If we think it was bad this year wait to see what it will be like next year and dare I say it but two years from now.

My post was in reference to the one Reformation Bear wrote.

[BlueKnight87 17,281]

1 hour ago, Smile said:

Look at the difference with the filth Brown gets a token citing the filth club comes out and say's they will fight it vigorously our set of cowards say nothing. 

And like clockwork Stewart and Sutton out bashing the SFA as well. They have this down to a fine art now. Statements and taig affiliates out instantly. 

While our board does nothing. They need to wake up and start taking some action. This dignified silence approach will continue to see us shafted. 

 

[bluenoz 30,807]

Brown not up until May 1st...... when everything has calmed down and the league won..... When does Gerrard's ban begin if he doesn't appeal. Sunday? So both cited in the same game but different times in the bans. Doesn't make sense to me. I must be a simpleton, can someone explain it to me please?

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,137]

1 minute ago, bluenoz said:

Brown not up until May 1st...... when everything has calmed down and the league won..... When does Gerrard's ban begin if he doesn't appeal. Sunday? So both cited in the same game but different times in the bans. Doesn't make sense to me. I must be a simpleton, can someone explain it to me please?

They have to let the thug be included and celibate on the park when they clinch the title.

Clayre is a very caring person, she cares very much about them.

[bluenoz 30,807]

2 minutes ago, ritchieshearercaldow said:

They have to let the thug be included and celibate on the park when they clinch the title.

Clayre is a very caring person, she cares very much about them.

How did a know think of that? They can win it at home on Saturday. Unbelievable! It really is.

[Prso's headband 35,426]

The scary thing is you can actually imagine that tarrier cow Whyte sitting wae a massive grin on her face when Brown goes for his “hearing”. 

Infiltrated every part of society and the generation before me thought it better to sit on their hands and do fuck all

[gogzy 31,195]

Have we ever waited a month to be pulled up on one of these charges?

[magic8ball 27,901]

1 minute ago, gogzy said:

Have we ever waited a month to be pulled up on one of these charges?

yup. Kent floored Brown in March .Citied in April 😊

[ianb1547 3,767]

13 minutes ago, ritchieshearercaldow said:

They have to let the thug be included and celibate on the park when they clinch the title.

Clayre is a very caring person, she cares very much about them.

If only they all were!!!

[ritchieshearercaldow 22,137]

Just now, ianb1547 said:

If only they all were!!!

 for once my predictive text gets it right.