Arfield to Southampton.

[Misteral 2,932]

Can't imagine there's anything in this

[Bigsasasfloppyhair 13,310]

I like Arfield and wouldn’t like to see him leave. 

[tannerall 25,935]

It's the time of year when agents tout around fake news to encourage  a possible pay rise/transfer fee for players which will generate them a nice percentage. 

Fake transfer news also keeps newspapers in business too. 

To be fair I can understand other clubs now showing an interest now that he is performing well, but expect he is here for the long run.

But £3 million ?   Given his recent form I think that the value, especially to any Premier League club would be minimum £5 million. 

 

 

 

 

[johanhentze 14,086]

1 hour ago, Malkytfp1 said:

Don't know how else to write this. Even tried using google translate but they had no language option for mongo.

You are basically justifying him being good because he is better than midfielders in the fucking Scottish league. Im saying thats no a good enough method to measure a player for Rangers.

The guy played in the EPL... an EPL club wanted to give him a new contract. Im pretty sure thats a good way to measure this particular player.

[kanjo 26,328]

I doubt we’ll sell unless it’s a serious offer. He is one of our most important players going forward. 

[RDB14 2,760]

He would probably cost £6m+ to replace like for like....  Plus he's Scottish so gets all the shite that comes with playing for Rangers. Now he has a year under his belt and could push us on next season.  Nah, no thanks.

[Amato 3,016]

DR saying it's pish. For once I think they're right.

[Smile 26,600]

Weird one if true, seems to have benefitted from his new role in the team.

[pcbear 10,913]

He is fit now settled and playing well getting better, I would be pissed off if there is any truth in it.

[Prso's headband 35,426]

9 hours ago, Malkytfp1 said:

Don't know how else to write this. Even tried using google translate but they had no language option for mongo.

You are basically justifying him being good because he is better than midfielders in the fucking Scottish league. Im saying thats no a good enough method to measure a player for Rangers.

The league he plays in? Oh ok lol. Absolute idiot man. 

[LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,510]

9 hours ago, King Jela said:

Why? If we are to challenge for the league Arfield is pivotal to that. Why remove a massive piece of the jigsaw for anything less than silly money? Madness that folk would accept less than 5 million for him, absolutely madness.  

I wouldn't sell him anyway. I just wouldn't expect anyone to pay more than 3/4 million for him if he was for sale.

[OhW 4,669]

 

[King Jela 20,361]

11 hours ago, Malkytfp1 said:

Its no fucking rocket science. Im saying if we compare players against SPL standard then were no setting a very high bar. By that logic were saying "oh he's better than Stevie Mallan at Hibs so he is good enough".

Were you dribbling when typing this out? 

[harlands plater 16,974]

Bit of a misleading thread title.

[BlueSuedeSambas 53,771]

Ok for arguments sakes let’s compare Arfields return to our most productive centre midfielder from each season in the five years before we went into administration.

07-08 

Ferguson: 8 goals, 16 assists

08-09 

Davis: 6 goals, 12 assists

09-10 

Davis: 4 goals, 16 assists

10-11

Davis: 5 goals, 12 assists

11-12

Davis: 5 goals, 14 assists

Arfield has 10 goals and 8 assists so far this season with 5 games still to play so he could easily add to both of those totals.

While not as creative the overall number of goals he’s been involved in or scored is comparable to our best/most creative midfielder during a period where we got to a UEFA Cup final and won three league titles in a row, while playing in a worse team.

So yeah, he’s easily good enough for us and he would probably be even better if he had better players around him too.

[plymouthranger 3,867]

Don’t want to sell him, think he’s really important to us and one of the few quality players we have. However, he will be 31 soon, we’re probably not in a position where we could turn down £4milllion or more for someone that age.

Id much rather sell Morelos for more and get better players around Arfield, but money talks.

[Mols wife 1]

5 mil and we will throw Tav in

[BlueSuedeSambas 53,771]

20 minutes ago, Mols wife said:

5 mil and we will throw Tav in

 

[raging blue 1972 894]

He's quite similar to armstrong who they bought for 7 mil. Arfield is tried and tested in England though couple years older so think if where any interest that wold be the ballpark figure.

Would I take it? couple of weeks ago aye, now not sure as he seems to have found his best position, coincidentally with Morelos being out.

[Davy Vandenbroucke 26,146]

32 minutes ago, Mols wife said:

5 mil and we will throw Tav in

@cushynumber @gogzy check the nick of this guy's posts

[Tiger Shaw 30,445]

1 hour ago, Mols wife said:

5 mil and we will throw Tav in

Stick to washing the dishes Mrs Mols.

[RFC55 108,794]

24 minutes ago, Bronzy said:

@cushynumber @gogzy check the nick of this guy's posts

Sometimes hard to spot. Staff can't check every post blah blah 

[Gascoigne8 3,378]

1 hour ago, Mols wife said:

5 mil and we will throw Tav in

@Rfc52

Quite surprised at this, i thought celtic were southamptons feeder club

[cascadeshrimp 1,455]

3 million.lol fuck off

Scot Arfield is at his peak,his prime, right now

A buying team is not buying potential here or a young player with promise. Scot will be at his max value right now.EPl and European experience and an international captain.

No wonder we get shite cash for players when even our own are under selling them

[mitre_mouldmaster 21,509]

2 hours ago, Mols wife said:

5 mil and we will throw Tav in