Bears r us 30,770 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, Dickie said: Obviously you’re not counting the dogs that took part. Now that is very true to be honest I love dogs and feel sorry that they are trailed around the streets with shite looking flags etc around their collars, time the SSPCA stepped in. 🐕 6 minutes ago, Dickie said: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfLuther 3,400 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 3 minutes ago, Bears r us said: Now that is very true to be honest I love dogs and feel sorry that they are trailed around the streets with shite looking flags etc around their collars, time the SSPCA stepped in. 🐕 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 10 hours ago, Bears r us said: 100,000 40,000 try about 15,000 They use that same taig Seville calculator. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Gone very quiet on the aitken front, supposed to have been an inquiry to settle her suitability for office yesterday, can we assume no inquiry took place or will take place ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,613 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 21 minutes ago, backup said: Gone very quiet on the aitken front, supposed to have been an inquiry to settle her suitability for office yesterday, can we assume no inquiry took place or will take place ? The only inquiry will be into the leak. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Meeting took place behind snp closed doors, she walked it still in position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,613 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 19 minutes ago, backup said: Meeting took place behind snp closed doors, she walked it still in position. Corrupt unionist council that they are 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 The media are still sitting on it, seems they knew the outcome yesterday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfLuther 3,400 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Club 1872 have submitted a FOI asking for the contents of these private facebook groups saying it falls inside FOI. What's the chances of getting the FOI on them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie 12,905 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 13 hours ago, SonOfLuther said: By the way those dogs don’t look like they died of natural causes,if ever any cunt looked like a serial killer it’s this cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 32 minutes ago, SonOfLuther said: Club 1872 have submitted a FOI asking for the contents of these private facebook groups saying it falls inside FOI. What's the chances of getting the FOI on them? none. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfLuther 3,400 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 minute ago, backup said: none. The good fight must go on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,613 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Lets use the RFFF to bring down our haters. Oh no, wait.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LochendBilly 8,410 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 35 minutes ago, Dickie said: By the way those dogs don’t look like they died of natural causes,if ever any cunt looked like a serial killer it’s this cunt. Or someone who molests dugs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 7 minutes ago, SonOfLuther said: The good fight must go on. Only the club/board and a capable QC can do that, as pointed out previously Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfLuther 3,400 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Just now, backup said: Only the club/board and a capable QC can do that, as pointed out previously Why so? Have the OO commented yet? Fact is a known bigot is still top 'dog' in GCC and she & her rhagtags can still do untold damage. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 minute ago, SonOfLuther said: Why so? Have the OO commented yet? Fact is a known bigot is still top 'dog' in GCC and she & her rhagtags can still do untold damage. Are you suggesting the board should wait or do nothing and let some others, who obviously have as much appetite to fight for their rights as our board does, carry the torch. A bit rich when mcaveety is taking the fight to the snp and aitken, while our lot are hand wringing. If our board don’t take action against the bint...she has won and we are shafted again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfLuther 3,400 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 minute ago, backup said: Are you suggesting the board should wait or do nothing and let some others, who obviously have as much appetite to fight for their rights as our board does, carry the torch. A bit rich when mcaveety is taking the fight to the snp and aitken, while our lot are hand wringing. If our board don’t take action against the bint...she has won and we are shafted again. I'm suggesting the board won't get involved officially at the moment. McAveety and the Tories were taking the fight to them. Club 1872 were involved. Where is the OO statement on the SNP/GCC stance? Why haven't they spoken? If anyone should speak for the Protestant People, surely it is they? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 9 minutes ago, SonOfLuther said: If anyone should speak for the Protestant People, surely it is they? This fiasco is about aitken invoking Ibrox and the directors box in relation to mcaveety. The board should be having a lawyer ask what exactly she was and is implying that is our fight no one else’s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,123 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 McAveety should be asking for the results of the meeting, he was the one targeted but then their all papes at heart and he probably agrees with them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bouncy 315 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 SPAD do well, more power to them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfLuther 3,400 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 minute ago, backup said: This fiasco is about aitken invoking Ibrox and the directors box in relation to mcaveety. The board should be having a lawyer ask what exactly she was and is implying that is our fight no one else’s. This fiasco is an accumulation of SNP bigotry extending to the OO, Labour fella and Rangers. What makes you think Rangers aren't taking legal advice? As the title of the thread is about Scottish Protestants and all the goings on since with the info available, I will ask a genuine question again. Why haven't the OO spoken in any way shape or form, yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 hour ago, SonOfLuther said: What makes you think Rangers aren't taking legal advice? Reality. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonOfLuther 3,400 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, backup said: Reality. We differ on opinion, sure we will see in time to come what action the Club take. I'm sure they will act, just not yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 16, 2019 Share Posted May 16, 2019 Susan Aitken offers apology for Frank McAveety Facebook post By Stewart Paterson @PatersonHTPolitical Correspondent The leader of Glasgow City Council has offered an apology for a remark and picture she shared about a rival politician in a private SNP Facebook group. Susan Aitken also branded the leak of the private group post as a “betrayal of trust”. Ms Aitken was reported by Labour group leader Frank McAveety to the Standards Commissioner for posting a picture last year amid a controversy about the council refusing a fanzone at Ibrox. The picture was of Mr McAveety attending a Rangers match in 2015 in the directors’ box. Ms Aitken commented: “Oh and if anyone fancies getting these nice photos of Frank McAveety enjoying hospitality in the Rangers directors’ box out there.” The post in a SNP group closed Facebook page was leaked last month. The council leader was accused by Labour of attempting to stir up a sectarian divide the city is trying to move away from. Mr McAveety said at a meeting of Glasgow City Council today that he was disappointed in the remark as the leader represents a local authority where football affiliation represents a “challenge”. At a meeting of Glasgow City Council, Ms Aitken repeated the post was “just a joke” and not related to sectarianism. She said: “It was a joke. It was nothing to do with sectarianism or football.” She said it was made in private and was not shared by anyone at the time. She said the SNP, like other parties, had been the “victim of a leak”, adding that political groups are entitled to have private discussions. For all your breaking Glasgow news, click here, or head to our Facebook, Twitter and Instagram pages She said: "If I had wanted to do as Frank McAveety suggests, then I could have tweeted it. I chose not to. I had no interest in continuing the unpleasant narrative.” She added: “It had nothing to do with sectarianism. She said the leaker had “betrayed the trust of the SNP Group” by putting it in the public domain. She added: “If Councillor McAveety is genuinely offended, then I apologise.” However, she said she shouldn’t have to apologise as “there was never any sectarian motive.” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.