Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said: LPB is always going to argue the fuss...it's what he does. The one on Defoe is a far worse elbow than Flanagan’s, it’s thrown point of elbow straight at the side of the head. Just because it’s happened at full tilt shouldn’t make any difference. 16BlueSherbert90, Blumhoilann and surfsup2 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RFC Eagle 4,888 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, bluenoz said: I thought she was looking at "other incidents" as well? Must have taken her specs off for those ones. Its not 'her', its a 3 taig panel that made the Flanagan decision. Not even sure what she does now tbh. I'm guessing the fact that Sportscene highlighted it and not Simunovic assaulting Defoe thats behind the bias. Bears 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
16BlueSherbert90 19,175 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Courtyard Bear said: The one on Defoe is a far worse elbow than Flanagan’s, it’s thrown point of elbow straight at the side of the head. Just because it’s happened at full tilt shouldn’t make any difference. I absolutely agree. Will that hack compliance board agree though? Courtyard Bear 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Just now, Sweettartangirl said: I absolutely agree. Will that hack compliance board agree though? Not a chance but they don’t need to, we just bend over backwards and ask how deep they want to shove it in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
backup 4,724 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 If king let's this slide I will need no further convincing that the price of his F&PP granted by the sfa was complicit silence in all matters . SeparateEntityMyArse 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, RFC Eagle said: Its not 'her', its a 3 taig panel that made the Flanagan decision. Not even sure what she does now tbh. I'm guessing the fact that Sportscene highlighted it and not Simunovic assaulting Defoe thats behind the bias. She refers it to the 3 man panel, so if she doesn’t think there is a case to answer it stops at her. Robmc1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross-Gazza genius 1,890 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 The thing that annoys me is there's no consistency at all with these decisions. This is the same panel that didn't see anything wrong when the Kilmarnock keeper thrust his elbow into kamaras face. Bears and Blumhoilann 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,287 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Courtyard Bear said: She refers it to the 3 man panel, so if she doesn’t think there is a case to answer it stops at her. So what Taigs are on the 3 man panel? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Robmc1 4,741 Posted May 14, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted May 14, 2019 15 minutes ago, loyalfollower said: Thought if the ref had dealt with any offence by issuing a card then nothing can be done retrospectively? Exactly, the ref rightly or wrongly has observed an incident and taken the appropriate action deemed necessary to deal with it. The compliance officer (in my mind) was to deal with serious incidents missed by the ref (Defoe incident above). This route is effectively referring a game twice, but only certain MSM constantly highlighted incidents. There was an Hibernian player previously yellow carded then retrospectively cited and banned by her for an challenge on a celtic player so it was only a matter of time before this caught up with us. Hope we get our act together, contest the decision and show the system up for the farce it is... RFC Eagle, ritchieshearercaldow, BridgeIsBlue and 3 others 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Shaw 30,135 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Ross-Gazza genius said: The thing that annoys me is there's no consistency at all with these decisions. This is the same panel that didn't see anything wrong when the Kilmarnock keeper thrust his elbow into kamaras face. They consistently go against us Ross-Gazza genius and surfsup2 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
surfsup2 1,533 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Courtyard Bear said: She refers it to the 3 man panel, so if she doesn’t think there is a case to answer it stops at her. But knowing as soon as hands it to them they will deal with it with a ban. totally not fair as the media has already had 2 days of shouting for a red . funny how they replay our incidents but see nothing when its them. corrupt to the core . Courtyard Bear 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross-Gazza genius 1,890 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Just now, Tiger Shaw said: They consistently go against us That's true Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueKnight87 17,242 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 6 minutes ago, Ross-Gazza genius said: The thing that annoys me is there's no consistency at all with these decisions. This is the same panel that didn't see anything wrong when the Kilmarnock keeper thrust his elbow into kamaras face. Don't forget this is also the same panel that seen nothing wrong when brown elbowed rat boy Naismith at tynecastle. The system is supposed to be for off the ball incidents missed (Simunovic on defoe). It is now being used to re referee games. Conveniently always our games when the media and taigs shout loud enough. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Just now, bluenoz said: So what Taigs are on the 3 man panel? Is it not 3 ex Refs?? The fact Flanagan got a 2 game ban was always on the cards as soon as it’s sent to them by the corrupt CO. It’s the fact a far worse elbow as far as we know wasn’t even sent to them to be looked at again. surfsup2, BlueKnight87 and bluenoz 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,011 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 We can protest and shout as much as we like on here, it won’t make a single bit of difference. The only ones that can do that are the club and any unbiased media, even if Ally or Boyd or any other pundit pointed out the inconsistency here, they might take notice. Its an open goal for any decent hack to have a go at the system. Negri's lovechild 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,507 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 16 minutes ago, Sweettartangirl said: LPB is always going to argue the fuss...it's what he does. It was a genuine question. I try and look at these incidents without the blue tinted glasses on and I can't see how that's worse. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, Robmc1 said: Exactly, the ref rightly or wrongly has observed an incident and taken the appropriate action deemed necessary to deal with it. The compliance officer (in my mind) was to deal with serious incidents missed by the ref (Defoe incident above). This route is effectively referring a game twice, but only certain MSM constantly highlighted incidents. There was an Hibernian player previously yellow carded then retrospectively cited and banned by her for an challenge on a celtic player so it was only a matter of time before this caught up with us. Hope we get our act together, contest the decision and show the system up for the farce it is... In that same game as well simovic leads with another flying elbow and Lego almost half’s a player in 2 both of which never even got looked at again. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 4 minutes ago, surfsup2 said: But knowing as soon as hands it to them they will deal with it with a ban. totally not fair as the media has already had 2 days of shouting for a red . funny how they replay our incidents but see nothing when its them. corrupt to the core . And that is where the corruption comes in. They don’t even send the Scum FC incidents to be looked at again not once ever. surfsup2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Hilts 12,819 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 We've tried criticising these corrupt cunts publicly and they're still blatantly shafting us. It'll be interesting to see what the club's next move is, as we surely won't let this lie. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,507 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 20 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said: It’s an actual flying elbow thrown at the head. Unless you've seen another angle that you can share with us I'm going to have to disagree. That clip shows no such thing imo. He throws an arm but "flying elbow thrown at the head" is clutching at straws in the extreme. It's two players running alongside each other so there's always going to be a coming together there whether accidental or deliberate. Flanagan has no such excuse so to claim Simunovic is worse here is just kidding yourself IMO. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: It was a genuine question. I try and look at these incidents without the blue tinted glasses on and I can't see how that's worse. One is a barge with his elbow to the chest which Lego ran into as much as Flanagan threw it. The other is a swinging elbow as the player runs past on the blindside straight to the side of the head. I know which one I would rather be on the receiving end of. backup, Bears and Robmc1 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaudrupsPatrickBoots 13,507 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 1 minute ago, Courtyard Bear said: One is a barge with his elbow to the chest which Lego ran into as much as Flanagan threw it. The other is a swinging elbow as the player runs past on the blindside straight to the side of the head. I know which one I would rather be on the receiving end of. For the record, I don't think Flanagan's is a red. I just don't think the Simunovic one is a worse offence. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Just now, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: Unless you've seen another angle that you can share with us I'm going to have to disagree. That clip shows no such thing imo. He throws an arm but "flying elbow thrown at the head" is clutching at straws in the extreme. It's two players running alongside each other so there's always going to be a coming together there whether accidental or deliberate. Flanagan has no such excuse so to claim Simunovic is worse here is just kidding yourself IMO. If that’s how you see the simovuc one then to be honest your view of it is laughable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courtyard Bear 41,357 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 1 minute ago, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: For the record, I don't think Flanagan's is a red. I just don't think the Simunovic one is a worse offence. I can see why they would Red card him. I cant see how after that they don’t dish out the same punishment to a far worse elbow in the same game. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritchieshearercaldow 22,011 Posted May 14, 2019 Share Posted May 14, 2019 Just now, LaudrupsPatrickBoots said: For the record, I don't think Flanagan's is a red. I just don't think the Simunovic one is a worse offence. They were both due a card but only one given, one ignored Lego wasn’t even hit in the face, if he’d been hit in the face he wouldn’t have been up so soon. He’s a sleeket cunt and knows every dirty trick in the book. Bobby Hume, Blumhoilann and Gandalf the Blue 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.