Rangers statement r.e. Flanagan Citation

[rabc10000 5,061]

2 minutes ago, backup said:

They can't give their own verdict, their conclusion must be within the laws of the game, which imho means the sumnovic decision needs to be challenged under natural justice.

Yeah what I was meaning with their own verdict was ofc whether a player should have been sent of or if it was in fact a yellow etc with ot just making stuff up to suit themselves if you know what I mean? 

[LiverpoolBlue 1,395]

Apparently she looked at sumo's elbow .. and dismissed it !!

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,540]

3 minutes ago, LiverpoolBlue said:

Apparently she looked at sumo's elbow .. and dismissed it !!

She never, seemingly a panel of ex refs did and couldnt agree that it was a red card

[backup 4,724]

20 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

Wouldn’t be with goal line technology so no controversy. 

Wouldnt be with VAR on offside decisions. 

Correct decisions or do you prefer wrong decisions and getting beat  

 

I prefer football played the way it is meant to be, a bit like... no a lot like Brian Clough.

[Bakbear 3,586]

56 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

She never, seemingly a panel of ex refs did and couldnt agree that it was a red card

I this correct though? Did she look at it and refer it to the panel? If so then she is relatively blameless. 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

1 hour ago, backup said:

I prefer football played the way it is meant to be, a bit like... no a lot like Brian Clough.

So you prefer to lose games because of mistakes by Refs and linesmen. 👍😂

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,540]

15 minutes ago, Bakbear said:

I this correct though? Did she look at it and refer it to the panel? If so then she is relatively blameless. 

Andy Newport on twitter said it, only evidence so far of either side of the debate

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

1 hour ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

She never, seemingly a panel of ex refs did and couldnt agree that it was a red card

Did they??  or is that what we are getting told to keep us quiet. 

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,540]

5 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

Did they??  or is that what we are getting told to keep us quiet. 

Wont really keep us quiet, either way we feel wronged, by her or 3 ex refs makes no difference, 

[Bakbear 3,586]

14 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

Wont really keep us quiet, either way we feel wronged, by her or 3 ex refs makes no difference, 

I personally think it makes a massive difference. 

If the CO has referred the Simunovic incident to the panel then She has shown balance, has not been influenced by tv reporting and cannot be called out in his case. 

If 3 ex referees have reviewed this footage and made their decision based on their experiences and judgement then apart from transparency on who those three are and an explanation of their decision, there is not much more to be asked for. 

I stress, in this case!

but then that’s the point right, the whole process needs to be transparent and definitive.  

[Blueteeth 2,185]

They have their rotten little fingers in so many pies now it's going to take years to disinfect... the pies and make them anywhere edible now.

I want a pie and beans now, or a pie floater - pie floating in pea soup.

 

[backup 4,724]

43 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

So you prefer to lose games because of mistakes by Refs and linesmen. 👍😂

Only if that is how you interpret it in your imagination👍

[Jimfanciesthedude 24,540]

36 minutes ago, Bakbear said:

I personally think it makes a massive difference. 

If the CO has referred the Simunovic incident to the panel then She has shown balance, has not been influenced by tv reporting and cannot be called out in his case. 

If 3 ex referees have reviewed this footage and made their decision based on their experiences and judgement then apart from transparency on who those three are and an explanation of their decision, there is not much more to be asked for. 

I stress, in this case!

but then that’s the point right, the whole process needs to be transparent and definitive.  

Is it not the same with flanagan though, she basically decides what gets sent to the panel, and in this case the panel decided against flanagan 

The only time she is a cow is when she fails to send people (tarriers) to the panel, in this case she sent one from each team to said panel 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

36 minutes ago, backup said:

Only if that is how you interpret it in your imagination👍

And here I was thinking we were actually going to have a sensible debate. 

But no just more of your bullshit. 

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

1 hour ago, Jimbeamjunior said:

Wont really keep us quiet, either way we feel wronged, by her or 3 ex refs makes no difference, 

I don’t believe for a minute she sent the taig player to the panel. 

[rabc10000 5,061]

10 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

I don’t believe for a minute she sent the taig player to the panel. 

Neither do I

[LiverpoolBlue 1,395]

Whether she did or she didn't is immaterial .. the fact that a scum player was yet again let off scot free says everything

[rabc10000 5,061]

6 minutes ago, LiverpoolBlue said:

Whether she did or she didn't is immaterial .. the fact that a scum player was yet again let off scot free says everything

It is material tho as its clearly showing a clear bias against a certain set of players while basically turning a blind eye to another set of players. To say its immaterial is way off the mark 

[To Be A Ranger 4,032]

20 minutes ago, Courtyard Bear said:

I don’t believe for a minute she sent the taig player to the panel. 

Rangers must be given the official emails that show she reported both incidents clearly, at the same time, and without a hint of bias. 

[LiverpoolBlue 1,395]

3 minutes ago, rabc10000 said:

It is material tho as its clearly showing a clear bias against a certain set of players while basically turning a blind eye to another set of players. To say its immaterial is way off the mark 

You're right .. I was meaning whether she did or didn't refer him.. at the end of the day the twat escaped punishment 

[rabc10000 5,061]

3 minutes ago, LiverpoolBlue said:

You're right .. I was meaning whether she did or didn't refer him.. at the end of the day the twat escaped punishment 

Ah kewl, I clearly picked u up wrong their mate

[Dickie 12,905]

Every cunt knows that sportscene decides who is punished and who is not. Who appointed this bitch and who selects this imaginary panel? The whole system was set up to deal with things the referee missed not to deal with things Neil Lennon and company aren’t happy with.

[backup 4,724]

21 minutes ago, LiverpoolBlue said:

Whether she did or she didn't is immaterial

It is very material, if they are lying about it.

[We Will Follow Rangers 12,921]

12 hours ago, backup said:

Talk is cheap

Agenda ridden pish on the other hand...

[backup 4,724]

6 minutes ago, wewillfollowrangers said:

Agenda ridden pish on the other hand...

Is still pish 👍