Rangers + Club 1872 Statements

[SteveEarle 9,724]

4 minutes ago, Robmc1 said:

Decided to tune in to SSB, Roger Hanna on tonight and wondered if he might form some sort of apology re his Morelos nonsense, I lasted about 3 minutes, no apology and straight on to fawning about Edouard. For an ex Rangers player Dalziel, co presenter, has become an all things celtic cheerleader...

And not one mention of the Rangers statement!

[eejay the dj 31,964]

2 hours ago, Sweettartangirl said:

For goodness sake....give the bickering a rest!!!!

I remember the days on here where this sort of stupid playground nonsense would be nipped in the bud. 

@admin these threads are getting ridiculous and have no decent flow anymore.  Having a laugh and silly banter is one thing, this is getting seriously petty by grown men though. If you want to rip one another, the OT is a great place for it. 

Yes that's right....pass it on, I am a grass. 

Can we get back to topic now yes? 

I hate to see good bears barking at one another . Even if there's a difference of opinion 

Ok their are cunts on RM that shouldn't be called bears . Plenty of huffy ones too . Yet most on this thread are good passionate bears .  

Attacking other bears , just cause they don't like them is just stupid for me .

I often get roped in to that shit too . Yet i try not to hold grudges with guys that keep it about football .

Rangers No 1, Sket  and Indigo are good bears . Absolute certainty . As is BA . 

Yet we argue , we disagree , we may even call each other names . Yet at the end of the day . We all support the same team 

Count to 10 and remember that before you take it too far 

[eejay the dj 31,964]

9 minutes ago, SteveEarle said:

And not one mention of the Rangers statement!

Revealing but we should all know . This show is in place for the scum and the sad bears that actually phone in . Must be daft

The only time any bear should permit themselves a listen . Is when the bheasts have lost a massive OF game . Just for a laugh 

[Robmc1 4,741]

19 minutes ago, SteveEarle said:

And not one mention of the Rangers statement!

Under their umbrella of ‘ongoing police enquiry’ no doubt which of course it is not. Wonder if their head of news/ sport (discussed her connection to Hollicom yesterday) has set the narrative for the show excluding this subject. Just a reminder attached of their claims...

[16BlueSherbert90 19,222]

2 hours ago, ForeverAndEver said:

There’s like 4 admin and that @ isn’t any of them btw

No worries..it used to work...one time.  

@gogzy @Creampuff @dummiesoot @fog @DBBTB @MisterC @ben51 and anyone else who considers themself admin/moderators on here.

Hopefully the bickering within our own has calmed down now anyway. Good grief. 

 

[BlueMe 25,327]

Rangers release an official statement over concerns about the prejudicial treatment of Morelos from various media outlets and also the racism he received at celtic park on the 29th of December in which a celtic fan has been charged, following a police investigation.

24 hours later and almost a complete media blackout regarding the clubs official statement - that alone, tells you all you need to know about the media in this country and their feelings about the club tbh. 

Morelos being a waster, cheat, idiot and a liar, manages to make the front pages on a daily basis, but tell the truth about celtic fans being racists or highlight the concentrated campaign in the media that's main objective seems to be damaging the Rangers brand and discrediting our main assets and it's  complete silence.

Disgraceful tbh.

[magic8ball 27,901]

32 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Yeah and we just accepted all that shite without any come back 

The guy who abused Sinclair was caught bang to rights ,so as any decent club would do they apologised 

Just the same as this time ,only difference is the taigs faced an allegation days after the game and have deflected and ignored everything since ,just hoping it would go away ,Nobody in SMSM can call them out either as they are just as guilty too 

[16BlueSherbert90 19,222]

24 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I hate to see good bears barking at one another . Even if there's a difference of opinion 

Ok their are cunts on RM that shouldn't be called bears . Plenty of huffy ones too . Yet most on this thread are good passionate bears .  

Attacking other bears , just cause they don't like them is just stupid for me .

I often get roped in to that shit too . Yet i try not to hold grudges with guys that keep it about football .

Rangers No 1, Sket  and Indigo are good bears . Absolute certainty . As is BA . 

Yet we argue , we disagree , we may even call each other names . Yet at the end of the day . We all support the same team 

Count to 10 and remember that before you take it too far 

I don't doubt plenty here are good bears...

Rfc52 is as well. 

 @BlueMe though...keep your eye on that one:) 

[magic8ball 27,901]

6 minutes ago, Robmc1 said:

Under their umbrella of ‘ongoing police enquiry’ no doubt which of course it is not. Wonder if their head of news/ sport (discussed her connection to Hollicom yesterday) has set the narrative for the show excluding this subject. Just a reminder attached of their claims...

I wonder who else they have on their client list ,More than likely it’s just seperate entity FC 

 

[Smile 26,600]

See the scum have banned sky sports from their press conferences even though they know Morelos was racially abused.

 

 

celtic are refusing to co-operate with Sky Sports as the Scottish champions pursue a full explanation for a mistranslated interview with the Rangers striker Alfredo Morelos.

In a major embarrassment for Sky, subtitles attached to Morelos, who spoke in Spanish, wrongly accused celtic supporters of racially abusing the Colombian at the Old Firm match on 29 December.

Sky’s reporters were not welcome at celtic’s pre-match press conference for Wednesday’s game at home to Hearts, as had been the case before last Sunday’s Scottish Cup tie against Clyde. Such a move is not typical of celtic and illustrates the scale of their feeling. The broadcaster faces a race to resolve the matter before its live screening of Aberdeen v celtic on Sunday.

After celtic’s initial complaint, Sky admitted “inaccuracies” in the interview and removed it from all platforms before making a corrected version available. It said in a statement: “After numerous steps undertaken by Sky to verify the interview thoroughly we can be clear that at no point did Morelos allege that any racial abuse was directed at him by celtic supporters in the interview. We apologise to the supporters of celtic football club for this serious error. We are reviewing our procedures for translated interviews to ensure this does not occur in future.”

There was, though, no detail offered publicly or privately as to how this situation arose. celtic remain angry with what they regard as the unsatisfactory nature of Sky’s response and have reported the situation to Ofcom.

This fall-out is all the more notable because Sky will begin an exclusive, five-year deal to screen live Scottish Premiership matches next season. Sky did not comment on this on Monday when approached by the Guardian. It has also been approached on Tuesday in relation to its lack of access to celtic’s media briefings.

Ofcom is looking through complaints from celtic supporters as well as from the club. An Ofcom spokesperson said: “We are assessing these complaints against our broadcasting rules, but have yet to decide whether or not to investigate.” This analysis typically takes around two weeks, with any formal investigation then usually completed within 50 working days.

celtic have specifically demanded to know who was responsible for the translation. “The use of mistranslation to convey false meaning is a dangerous form of fake news which must be condemned and sanctioned,” said the club’s chief executive, Peter Lawwell.

Rangers are yet to say anything specifically about the misrepresentation of their player by Sky. Morelos’s representatives, World in Motion, did not comment when approached by the Guardian. The club did, though, issue a lengthy statement on Monday evening after it emerged that a 12-year-old had been charged in relation to a racist chant directed towards Morelos at celtic Park. Rangers took aim at what they perceive as unfair treatment of their leading striker by the Scottish media.

“Rangers had a duty of care not to say anything that might compromise a live Police Scotland investigation,” the statement said. “What none of us should ever do, however, is dismiss, or trivialise abusive behaviour as too many media outlets, journalists, and pundits have done in this instance.”

It added: “When a player is at the centre of an abuse claim he is treated with respect and sensitivity and given support. That is certainly the case in England, but not here and most certainly not with Alfredo Morelos, who is actually being demonised in many quarters of the media.”

[scottyscott1963 18,208]

39 minutes ago, Robmc1 said:

For an ex Rangers player Dalziel,

that fuckin tosser dropped us like a hot spud when he took it up the erchie for  his two bob job with a station run by fenians for fenians. 

[bluenoz 30,679]

So they ban Sky for initially calling out racism. Even though the interpretation was found to be inaccurate, they have now been charged with racism. A club in denial at every turn. 

[beararse 6,365]

5 hours ago, Rfc52 said:

Just noticed the end bit of the drivel

 

Drivel, is it?

How’d you come to that conclusion?

it’s simple maths.

90,000+  posts divided by 365 days  divided by 11 years equates to just over 22 posts per day, every day since you joined the forum almost 11 years ago.

I’ve ignored leap years....and gave you an extra couple of months to bring us up to a full 11 years, just in case you thought you could point score with those observations.

So, assuming you actually sleep, it works out you have posted something on RM on average around 1.5 times every waking hour since 2009.

And you call me mongo......

[born a blue nose 90,711]

They can ban the biggest money spinner in football n we’re scared to call out/ ban graham Spiers lol that’s fucking depressing as fuck tbh 

 

[dummiesoot 15,990]

4 minutes ago, beararse said:

Drivel, is it?

How’d you come to that conclusion?

it’s simple maths.

90,000+  posts divided by 365 days  divided by 11 years equates to just over 22 posts per day, every day since you joined the forum almost 11 years ago.

I’ve ignored leap years....and gave you an extra couple of months to bring us up to a full 11 years, just in case you thought you could point score with those observations.

So, assuming you actually sleep, it works out you have posted something on RM on average around 1.5 times every waking hour since 2009.

And you call me mongo......

Seriously, give it a rest.

[RFC55 108,713]

23 minutes ago, beararse said:

Drivel, is it?

How’d you come to that conclusion?

it’s simple maths.

90,000+  posts divided by 365 days  divided by 11 years equates to just over 22 posts per day, every day since you joined the forum almost 11 years ago.

I’ve ignored leap years....and gave you an extra couple of months to bring us up to a full 11 years, just in case you thought you could point score with those observations.

So, assuming you actually sleep, it works out you have posted something on RM on average around 1.5 times every waking hour since 2009.

And you call me mongo......

Ffs

[BridgeIsBlue 66,595]

24 minutes ago, beararse said:

Drivel, is it?

How’d you come to that conclusion?

it’s simple maths.

90,000+  posts divided by 365 days  divided by 11 years equates to just over 22 posts per day, every day since you joined the forum almost 11 years ago.

I’ve ignored leap years....and gave you an extra couple of months to bring us up to a full 11 years, just in case you thought you could point score with those observations.

So, assuming you actually sleep, it works out you have posted something on RM on average around 1.5 times every waking hour since 2009.

And you call me mongo......

[dummiesoot 15,990]

Every cunt give it a rest, it is boring, thread will get locked.

[STEPPS BOY 73,790]

35 minutes ago, beararse said:

Drivel, is it?

How’d you come to that conclusion?

it’s simple maths.

90,000+  posts divided by 365 days  divided by 11 years equates to just over 22 posts per day, every day since you joined the forum almost 11 years ago.

I’ve ignored leap years....and gave you an extra couple of months to bring us up to a full 11 years, just in case you thought you could point score with those observations.

So, assuming you actually sleep, it works out you have posted something on RM on average around 1.5 times every waking hour since 2009.

And you call me mongo......

Beararse this evening..

 

 

[BridgeIsBlue 66,595]

2 minutes ago, dummiesoot said:

Every cunt give it a rest, it is boring, thread will get locked.

Locking an entire thread because one poster is continually making a cunt of himself? 

Makes sense. 

[Bears r us 30,770]

1 hour ago, Blue Avenger said:

Herein lies the root cause of our problem (borrowed from D'Art's post/thread)............

 

"There has been something of a mixed reaction to the Rangers statement on social media. Whether you liked or loathed it, I’m far from convinced that the silence of the Rangers board is justified due to ongoing Police investigations. Much of the unedifying media content and conduct occurred well before the game which gave rise to the latest criminal proceedings. Call me cynical, but the catalyst to this latest Rangers statement release appears to be the recent attack on James Traynor rather than the long standing catalogue of attacks on Alfredo Morelos. As many of us repeatedly warned the Murray regime “So as you sow, so shall ye reap”. Dignified silence is neither dignified nor effective, it is a complete abdication of responsibility – an easy out for those are afraid to fulfil the sacred trust bestowed upon them as directors and guardians of our club."

 

On the money once again from D'art. 👏

[STEPPS BOY 73,790]

6 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

Locking an entire thread because one poster is continually making a cunt of himself? 

Makes sense. 

Harsh on Rfc52 pal.

 

apologise.

[Courtyard Bear 41,357]

Rfc52 & Beararse take your pick who is who. 

[born a blue nose 90,711]

Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

Rfc52 & Beararse take your pick who is who. 

A love how the guys made it give him the “one two” genius 😂

[Getstiffed 8,863]

Rain man on the ropes here imo