Jump to content

Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, The Dude said:

That's always been the format for voting in the SPFL. It's to stop the lower levels essentially having a veto over the rest of the leagues. It impacts the number of reps on the SPFL board (L1&L2 get one seat between them, Championship gets two and the Premiership get three)

Thought they’d tried to pull a fast one, as I can see 3 possibly 4 clubs who 100% wouldn’t want the season theme end as is 

Sweetheart likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 27.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

WE have been presented with evidence via a whistleblower that raises serious concerns surrounding the SPFL’s processes relating to its stewardship of the voting on the resolution presented to member C

Hope you dont mind mate but thought I'd give the Hornets nest a wee stir...  

Posted Images

6 minutes ago, backup said:

Unless the tv companies have a force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts, they haven’t a leg to stand on.

TV companies are in a fairly strong position actually.

They will have been contracted to a certain amount of games in a season. If they don't get all the games they have signed up for, then they could withhold a proportion of the cash in the contract.

What doesn't change a thing in the TV companies favour is calling the league void or calling it early and naming a champion. Either outcome still means that they have not been able to show the number of games in their contract.

Sweetheart and dougie76 like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

TV companies are in a fairly strong position actually.

They will have been contracted to a certain amount of games in a season. If they don't get all the games they have signed up for, then they could withhold a proportion of the cash in the contract.

What doesn't change a thing in the TV companies favour is calling the league void or calling it early and naming a champion. Either outcome still means that they have not been able to show the number of games in their contract.

Like I said, if the do not have the relevant  force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts they don’t have a leg to stand on.

Of course you are entitled to your opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Straight-Edge-Loyal said:

To be fair it is Easter Sunday they will be in the chapel being buggered by their local priest. 

I think the SPFL are meeting today . They will no doubt be getting all their stories right . The scum will be in on the conference call 

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I hope that is the last time i see this shower on our concourses . Shower of taig bastards 

I am still none the wiser. There was a story mentioned earlier in the thread about someone From Ladbrokes getting into trouble possibly. Someone else asked what it is about and nobody replied. Have they paid out on Sellick or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hadron Collider said:

They have to be mate. That was some statement. They have to back it up. 

Maybe . listen we know our club . They do not go on the attack lightly . I'm in firm belief , we have to trust them here.

Stop reading too much into things as it's quiet . The corrupt fuckers have no where to go with this now  IMO  

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, backup said:

Like I said, if the do not have the relevant  force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts they don’t have a leg to stand on.

Of course you are entitled to your opinion.

A FM clause relieves the party claiming FM from the obligation to perform the contract. Don’t see how that is of relevance to BT. It would be the SPFL claiming FM.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Maybe . listen we know our club . They do not go on the attack lightly . I'm in firm belief , we have to trust them here.

Stop reading too much into things as it's quiet . The corrupt fuckers have no where to go with this now  IMO  

wow, you have changed your tune re the board. Well done!

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, backup said:

Unless the tv companies have a force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts, they haven’t a leg to stand on.

Spfl rules has  a Force Majeure  for an event, which is determined by an Appeal Tribunal to have been unforeseeable and unavoidable.
The reason they can’t use is is that it’ll prevent the gifting of a title for their football team. This vote shouldn’t of even existed. 
 

Sweetheart and magic8ball like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I think the SPFL are meeting today . They will no doubt be getting all their stories right . The scum will be in on the conference call 

The old CID mantra of ABC is always worth remembering in such situations;..

Assume nothing

Believe no one

Check everything

we can utilise A and B, we are however in no position to utilise C 👍

Sweetheart likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 21 April 2021 18:00 Until 20:00
      0  
      St. Johnstone v Rangers
      McDiarmid Park
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...