Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent

[6superbarry6 8,667]

2 minutes ago, The Dude said:

That's always been the format for voting in the SPFL. It's to stop the lower levels essentially having a veto over the rest of the leagues. It impacts the number of reps on the SPFL board (L1&L2 get one seat between them, Championship gets two and the Premiership get three)

Thought they’d tried to pull a fast one, as I can see 3 possibly 4 clubs who 100% wouldn’t want the season theme end as is 

[backup 4,722]

Unless the tv companies have a force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts, they haven’t a leg to stand on.

[bornabear 5,502]

45 minutes ago, Sweetheart said:

 

Go get him girl. 

[bornabear 5,502]

25 minutes ago, pcbear said:

Lots of guesswork bouncing this thread all over the place, I assume Mr Park will have all the bullets in place ready to fire so best wait and see our next move,

Spot on mate.

[OceanRain 2,840]

Worth reminding people

[Malvern 11,328]

25 minutes ago, backup said:

The evidence needs to be presented to the police, who would investigate and report to the Crown Office, anything else is conjecture.

That's a potential bundle of evidence lost then.

[eejay the dj 31,815]

I think this is the  quietest I’ve ever heard the bheasts and Liewell. .Very revealing eh 

Or maybe we will hear from them in coming hours 🤔

[mitre_mouldmaster 12,911]

6 minutes ago, backup said:

Unless the tv companies have a force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts, they haven’t a leg to stand on.

TV companies are in a fairly strong position actually.

They will have been contracted to a certain amount of games in a season. If they don't get all the games they have signed up for, then they could withhold a proportion of the cash in the contract.

What doesn't change a thing in the TV companies favour is calling the league void or calling it early and naming a champion. Either outcome still means that they have not been able to show the number of games in their contract.

[Paisley Blue Loyal 7,221]

2 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I think this is the  quietest I’ve ever heard the bheasts and Liewell. .Very revealing eh 

Or maybe we will hear from them in coming hours 🤔

You no heard mate, Nothing to do with them apparently 😂😂

[Straight-Edge-Loyal 5,318]

I wonder if we could come out with some of the milder evidence to get the inquiry started and then feed them the truly fuck the Scottish football system stuff then. 

[backup 4,722]

1 minute ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

TV companies are in a fairly strong position actually.

They will have been contracted to a certain amount of games in a season. If they don't get all the games they have signed up for, then they could withhold a proportion of the cash in the contract.

What doesn't change a thing in the TV companies favour is calling the league void or calling it early and naming a champion. Either outcome still means that they have not been able to show the number of games in their contract.

Like I said, if the do not have the relevant  force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts they don’t have a leg to stand on.

Of course you are entitled to your opinion.

[Straight-Edge-Loyal 5,318]

4 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I think this is the  quietest I’ve ever heard the bheasts and Liewell. .Very revealing eh 

Or maybe we will hear from them in coming hours 🤔

To be fair it is Easter Sunday they will be in the chapel being buggered by their local priest. 

[Colin Traive 11,473]

13 minutes ago, mitre_mouldmaster said:

Sorry but this argument does not stack up.

The breach of contract is about the number of games played and shown by the broadcaster.

It makes no difference if we end the league now and call it null and void compared to ending it now and declaring a champion.

In either circumstance, the broadcaster has been able to show X number of the contracted Y games.

Down south, they are talking about making up the number of games next season, so sky are being given the number of games they paid for.

If we end the season early then our contract is has not been fulfilled. Calling the league null and void does no more harm to the contract with the broadcaster than calling it early and naming a champion.

100%

Early on Liewell made a statement about decisions with serious implications, suggesting Null and Void would mean paying back gazillions when in fact there is no difference between declaring or null/voiding in terms of games played or rebate due.

Still gobsmacked at how readily this option is being ignored.

[eejay the dj 31,815]

Just now, Paisley Blue Loyal said:

You no heard mate, Nothing to do with them apparently 😂😂

I think our club will be in control here . Let our enemies dig themselves a bigger hole .

 

[Hadron Collider 14,035]

Just now, eejay the dj said:

I think our club will be in control here . Let our enemies dig themselves a bigger hole .

 

They have to be mate. That was some statement. They have to back it up. 

[eejay the dj 31,815]

2 minutes ago, Straight-Edge-Loyal said:

To be fair it is Easter Sunday they will be in the chapel being buggered by their local priest. 

I think the SPFL are meeting today . They will no doubt be getting all their stories right . The scum will be in on the conference call 

[Straight-Edge-Loyal 5,318]

Just now, eejay the dj said:

I think the SPFL are meeting today . They will no doubt be getting all their stories right . The scum will be in on the conference call 

If there is corruption they will be shitting it now and I believe there is shut them down. 

[Blumhoilann 6,211]

Remember Mr Park's statement,wherein he stated he'd shown some evidence to other clubs with which they had agreed. We're not on our own in this imo.

[BlueThunder 5,356]

24 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I hope that is the last time i see this shower on our concourses . Shower of taig bastards 

I am still none the wiser. There was a story mentioned earlier in the thread about someone From Ladbrokes getting into trouble possibly. Someone else asked what it is about and nobody replied. Have they paid out on Sellick or something?

[eejay the dj 31,815]

1 minute ago, Hadron Collider said:

They have to be mate. That was some statement. They have to back it up. 

Maybe . listen we know our club . They do not go on the attack lightly . I'm in firm belief , we have to trust them here.

Stop reading too much into things as it's quiet . The corrupt fuckers have no where to go with this now  IMO  

[BookWorm 1,534]

18 minutes ago, bornabear said:

Go get him girl. 

[BoydsFavouriteDonut 176]

7 minutes ago, backup said:

Like I said, if the do not have the relevant  force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts they don’t have a leg to stand on.

Of course you are entitled to your opinion.

A FM clause relieves the party claiming FM from the obligation to perform the contract. Don’t see how that is of relevance to BT. It would be the SPFL claiming FM.

[bluenoz 16,771]

3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Maybe . listen we know our club . They do not go on the attack lightly . I'm in firm belief , we have to trust them here.

Stop reading too much into things as it's quiet . The corrupt fuckers have no where to go with this now  IMO  

wow, you have changed your tune re the board. Well done!

[Howsitgoing 4,215]

16 minutes ago, backup said:

Unless the tv companies have a force majeure/pandemic clause in their contracts, they haven’t a leg to stand on.

Spfl rules has  a Force Majeure  for an event, which is determined by an Appeal Tribunal to have been unforeseeable and unavoidable.
The reason they can’t use is is that it’ll prevent the gifting of a title for their football team. This vote shouldn’t of even existed. 
 

[backup 4,722]

3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

I think the SPFL are meeting today . They will no doubt be getting all their stories right . The scum will be in on the conference call 

The old CID mantra of ABC is always worth remembering in such situations;..

Assume nothing

Believe no one

Check everything

we can utilise A and B, we are however in no position to utilise C 👍