Robmc1 4,741 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 hour ago, ritchieshearercaldow said: Could it be we will on Tuesday, it’s still a holiday weekend 👍 Holding back potentially incriminating/ specialist information (unknown to the complicit parties) is a well used tactic in a number of disciplines over and above this scenario. If indeed truly guilty,  the cognitive pressure  of not knowing the potential information exposing them will potentially drive these parties to a state or worry, potentially panic and that’s the point mistakes are likely to manifest. If the information is disclosed immediately then planning can begin to address (cover) the issues. Of course this may not be relevant in this scenario however this produces results and may be the case... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoydsFavouriteDonut 230 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 30 minutes ago, backup said: Because the  claimant cannot extract further benefit if enacting FM ....from the same contract, canal tv in France has already exercised FM with the French ligue, finito 👍 Ah, okay. I thought we were working on the assumption the tv companies had already paid so would be looking to claim back monies. That’s where I don’t see FM being relevant. If they are still to pay/perform it might be relevant although FM often won’t protect against payment obligations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,287 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, backup said: No. It is totally irrelevant, the one I posted is perfectly clear, no vote being posted is deemed as refuting the motion đź‘Ť wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueThunder 8,439 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said:  Our board better know what they are doing here. This evidence better be substantial. Mind you, how can he be confident they acted appropriately if he doesn’t know what our evidence is. I wonder what the significant misinformation is? Dundee voted/hadn’t voted? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,909 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Robmc1 said: Holding back potentially incriminating/ specialist information (unknown to the complicit parties) is a well used tactic in a number of disciplines over and above this scenario. If indeed truly guilty,  the cognitive pressure  of not knowing the potential information exposing them will potentially drive these parties to a state or worry, potentially panic and that’s the point mistakes are likely to manifest. If the information is disclosed immediately then planning can begin to address (cover) the issues. Of course this may not be relevant in this scenario however this produces results and may be the case... And that fact information is growing all the time. Why just go with a couple pieces of evidence when you are getting alot more? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TEFTONG 59,852 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Laudrup1984 said:  Translated as me and my two taig loving pals have done nothing wrong. Honest guys. Plus big pete is squeaky clean. I really hope the powder we are keeping dry blows these bawbags away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanRain 2,845 Posted April 12, 2020 Author Share Posted April 12, 2020 10 minutes ago, Tero Penttila said: They issue a statement on everything.  Particularly when it’s Rangers that have spoken. No one - including Rangers - has pointed fingers at them yet. They're hardly likely to release a statement along the lines of "Here, by the way, if over the course of the next 48 hours Neil Doncaster or Dundee Football Club mention us, we've an alibi. Tiocfaidh ár lá." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,287 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Laudrup1984 said: Â fucking liars! They were bought between 5-6pm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,909 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said: Â Haha that's what MacLennan and Lawwell are going with? Oh this is going to be so good to see.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 So are they suggesting Dundee sent a 'no'Â vote earlier in the day. The 'no' vote wasn't received. Dundee in the meantime said disregard the 'no' vote, Later that evening their earlier 'no' vote was received? FFS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tero Penttila 425 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said:  That just makes me think the SPFL have acted improperly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,909 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said:  Well if that's what they want to go with. When the backs are against the wall.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,909 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, Laudrup1984 said: So are they suggesting Dundee sent a 'no'Â vote earlier in the day. The 'no' vote wasn't received. Dundee in the meantime said disregard the 'no' vote, Later that evening their earlier 'no' vote was received? FFS That's what Lawwell and MacLennan are going with. Digging that hole ever deeper. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canabear 4,558 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, BlueThunder said: Our board better know what they are doing here. This evidence better be substantial. Mind you, how can he be confident they acted appropriately if he doesn’t know what our evidence is. I wonder what the significant misinformation is? They might think they know what we have , which i'm hoping is way off the mark , and are trying to draw a response from us. I hope we have something that will blow the doors off of Scottish Football. Anything less will be a bit anti-climactic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudrup1984 25,100 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moody Blue Legend 61,035 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, Laudrup1984 said: Â Absolutely reekin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tero Penttila 425 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 1 minute ago, OceanRain said: No one - including Rangers - has pointed fingers at them yet. They're hardly likely to release a statement along the lines of "Here, by the way, if over the course of the next 48 hours Neil Doncaster or Dundee Football Club mention us, we've an alibi. Tiocfaidh ár lá." Rangers could say PG Tips was superior to Tetley’s and celtic would make a statement. They cannot allow us the last word on anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanRain 2,845 Posted April 12, 2020 Author Share Posted April 12, 2020 Some new lies? Thank fuck! I was getting bored here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jb85 1,783 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 13 minutes ago, Gascoigne8 said: Surely read receipts are a standard in these circumstances I cancel the read receipts at work when I open an email and that pops up. Not sure what happens at the other end though but there is an option to cancel them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OceanRain 2,845 Posted April 12, 2020 Author Share Posted April 12, 2020 Just now, Tero Penttila said: Rangers could say PG Tips was superior to Tetley’s and celtic would make a statement. They cannot allow us the last word on anything. Well, they haven't, and they wont. Not until someone reaches for their gun first. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robmc1 4,741 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, esquire8 said: And that fact information is growing all the time. Why just go with a couple pieces of evidence when you are getting alot more? I’ve  no doubt Rangers will be accumulating any and all evidence available however as per my post our board hold all of the cards here as I believe over confidence by SFPL/ celtic has left so many loose ends they’ll be sweating over what is actually held. Also it’s only an option of what could be happening but the uncertainty is the driver that will cause them the most distress atm... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Fantana 28,894 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Dundee fucked up their vote, is that it? If the club don’t move fast this will lose traction and be swept under the carpet as usual Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Negri's lovechild 13,591 Posted April 12, 2020 Share Posted April 12, 2020 Let's be honest here, if Rangers were in the wrong, the SPFL wouldn't be writing to member clubs saying "we're above board, honest". They would be publicly nailing us to the cross (Easter pun intended). They know we have them, it just looks like they don't know exactly what that something is and are scrambling for any allies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.