Jump to content

Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent


OceanRain

Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

wrong.

seriously, it doesn't say "You will not be deemed to agree, if you fail to reply"

what relevance does the last sentence have to anything, other tha poa.

happy to be corrected, given guidance  👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 27.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 minutes ago, OceanRain said:

Don't give them the traffic:

SPFL chairman Murdoch MacLennan’s letter in full

Dear All,

........................

Further, it has been suggested that all Ladbrokes Championship club votes were cast on Friday night.

One Ladbrokes Championship club attempted to submit a voting slip, which did not reach the SPFL until late that evening.

so they did get it after all

Earlier, at 6pm on Friday, that club had confirmed in writing to the SPFL that any attempted vote from that club should not be considered as cast.

thought once vote sent that was it, or can all now change their minds

We have had a number of conversations with the chairman of that club over the weekend, in which he reiterated that his club had not yet voted on the SPFL resolution.

just said above they had voted and was received

The SPFL has proceeded on the basis of the unequivocal instruction from that club received at 6pm on Friday.

ye ok we can all draw our own conclusions - to quote jim spence "some might say..... "

..........................................

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ger4life_1872 said:

Rangers will probably get charged with bringing the game into disrepute tomorrow for not handing any evidence over 

It's a stick on.  We are going to come out of this looking bad, and those teflon covered bastards will get away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KingKirk said:

Cunts digging his own crave. My bother works in CID. Those people he interviews don't say shit on the basis of legal advice.

Why cause the chances are if they do they'll incriminate themselves just like this plumb 😁😁😁😁

What MacLennan said is technically right to a degree, he is just twisting it to try benefit the way they have acted. Clubs have seen through the act though, that's their big issue. It's no longer just us....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, backup said:

seriously, it doesn't say "You will not be deemed to agree, if you fail to reply"

what relevance does the last sentence have to anything, other tha poa.

happy to be corrected, given guidance  👍

Many others, not just me, read that as you can't change your YES vote but you can change your NO vote. I assume specifically meaning Dundee.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

Just to say I don't think Park and Graham expected this statement today. They've got wind of other clubs getting in contact with us. Like I said with Aberdeen yesterday....

The pressure is mounting by the minute here and the longer we wait someone is going to crack and say something that they'll live to regret for a long time to come.

We simply must have something explosive here to evoke this reaction from Mclenananananan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, esquire8 said:

What MacLennan said is technically right to a degree, he is just twisting it to try benefit the way they have acted. Clubs have seen through the act though, that's their big issue. It's no longer just us....

Of course but he's panicking now hence that statement why the panic if he and his organisation have done nothing wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

All good mate, just sit back and relax and let the good times roll. 

Really hope that your got an insite in to what is happening behind the scenes and not just guessing 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

What results? If they're assuming Dundee havent voted then there is no result yet.

By their own rules if a vote is not lodged by the deadline Fri 17.00,it is automatically deemed a NO vote but low and behold,suddenly the deadline was only advisory and clubs have 28 days to vote and all because it didn't go their way. Games a bogey 😞

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, gogzy said:

It's a stick on.  We are going to come out of this looking bad, and those teflon covered bastards will get away with it.

Have some faith ffs man. There is plenty of evidence that suggests otherwise and that is before the club submit the evidence they hold from the whistleblower.

This board is stronger and more resolute than previous boards mate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BlueThunder said:

I though we suggested using the current placing a and altering layer if needed.(pay back cash or gain more if places change)

It was that the season couldn't be over until all 38 games had been played but use the current placinga a to distribute the funds to financially help all of the clubs out and then like you said pay back or gain if places changed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, OceanRain said:

Even after everything I 've read over this weekend, I cannot believe they are expecting anyone, anyone at all, to buy that.

If other clubs can't see that there is corruption at play, then they deserve everything they get. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Companies Act 2006 Section 296

Procedure for signifying agreement to written resolution

(1)A member signifies his agreement to a proposed written resolution when the company receives from him (or from someone acting on his behalf) an authenticated document—

(a)identifying the resolution to which it relates, and

(b)indicating his agreement to the resolution.

(2)The document must be sent to the company in hard copy form or in electronic form.

(3)A member's agreement to a written resolution, once signified, may not be revoked.

(4)A written resolution is passed when the required majority of eligible members have signified their agreement to it.

SPFL Statement:

Further, it has been suggested that all Ladbrokes Championship club votes were cast on Friday night. One Ladbrokes Championship club attempted to submit a voting slip, which did not reach the SPFL until late that evening. Earlier, at 6pm on Friday, that club had confirmed in writing to the SPFL that any attempted vote from that club should not be considered as cast. We have had a number of conversations with the chairman of that club over the weekend, in which he reiterated that his club had not yet voted on the SPFL resolution. The SPFL has proceeded on the basis of the unequivocal instruction from that club received at 6pm

 

Where in the Act does it allow for a submitted vote being revoked at any time whether before or after receipt? 

For me, once received the action is complete, no intervening attempt to cancel it can do so as all criteria are met the moment it is received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 30 March 2024 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hibernian
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...