Jump to content

Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent


OceanRain

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 27.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
19 minutes ago, GSBear said:

I have a feeling that it was lined up (and Jackson was in the loop) and Dundee were going to vote Yes, until the Thistle legal report. The statement Dundee has just put out seems a bit of a rushed, non statement, I bet they had another one lined up to be released!

I think Jackson was acting on instructions with that article to try and flush us out and show our hand.

Another fail fail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Dave Hedgehog said:

 

Im happy with my own views through this and there is a lot of guys on here I would listen to, Keith Jackson is supposed to be a top journalist

Look how wrong he is again because he has an agenda he won’t deviate from.

 

That phrase has never been uttered before in all of human history.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MoodyBlue1872 said:

If our board deliver - for a change - then they will get all the credit in the world from me. 

Until they do, I will remain cautious on this. Hardly a big deal ffs. 

There is a difference between being cautious and being negative

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dundee saying they have been in talks for a few days regarding league reconstruction is a wide open admittence they have been getting bribed.

I would love to know exactly who has been in talks with them.

Will any journalist ask that?

I don’t know who spoke to them but it was definitely Neil Doncaster and Peter Lawwell 😂😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Dave Hedgehog said:

Dundee saying they have been in talks for a few days regarding league reconstruction is a wide open admittence they have been getting bribed.

I would love to know exactly who has been in talks with them.

Will any journalist ask that?

I don’t know who spoke to them but it was definitely Neil Doncaster and Peter Lawwell 😂😂

As I said, this statement is alot more than saying nothing. Maybe this is why the SPFL haven't released anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, stuart1994 said:

Don’t really want to read through this as I’ve missed a lot, but am I correct in saying the reason Dundee had asked for their vote to be reconsidered was reconstruction being dangled in front of them ?  

Appears so oh and a series of glamour friendlies against the shite in the premership

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

"Over the past few days, we have entered into various positive discussions with reconstruction at the forefront of these."

Now if that's with the SPFL then they are in deep shit.

This should not be happening.

Are the SPFL that thick or just so arrogant?!

The whole fucking place needs cleansed, including the SFA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MoodyBlue1872 said:

If our board deliver - for a change - then they will get all the credit in the world from me. 

Until they do, I will remain cautious on this. Hardly a big deal ffs. 

Pretty much where I stand. The accumulation of years tends to do that to you. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, stuart1994 said:

Don’t really want to read through this as I’ve missed a lot, but am I correct in saying the reason Dundee had asked for their vote to be reconsidered was reconstruction being dangled in front of them ?  

we don't know what they were offered, but changing a vote last minute, silence for 3 days, this was the cunts only out...we should still call it, uefa will tell everyone its null and void...thats the only reason they tried to push it through, any other league doing this pish?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Tero Penttila said:

I almost think I must be missing something. 

Reconstruction was never part of the vote agenda, moving the goal posts

 

Also the current rules say two years notice required for reconstruction

It is bribery

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dummiesoot said:

There is a difference between being cautious and being negative

It's not difficult to be either cautious or negative with regard to the dealings and handling of situations by our board over the years. 

They have a chance to put that right on this thing. I pray they do. But will refrain from jumping up and down in excitement at this stage if that's ok. 

Deliver and they will get praised to fuck by me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Brackley said:

I think Jackson was acting on instructions with that article to try and flush us out and show our hand.

Another fail fail.

Would make sense. I’m sure they are desperate to know what we have.

I wonder what the line will be on Clyde tonight?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, dummiesoot said:

Reconstruction was never part of the vote agenda, moving the goal posts

 

Also the current rules say two years notice required for reconstruction

It is bribery

That's how I'm reading it. Dundee openly admitting they are getting bribed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 28 April 2024 11:30 Until 13:30
      0  
      St Mirren v Rangers
      The SMiSA Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
      Live on Sky Sports Main Event and Sky Sports Football

×
×
  • Create New...