crazy bob swollenbaws 1,857 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Think someone said their is an SPFL meet today at 14:00? Hope Robertson turns up complete with lawyer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFamousPigeon 9,352 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Discussions of canary trapping going on with the document... Masterful if so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Deacon 54,676 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 8 minutes ago, Sweetheart said: Hopefully the club has put a typo in each copy sent out, so as any leak can be identified. That would be absolutely genius Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mclean RFC 1,244 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, sRcFoCt said: If you are hanging of the word of sutton,jackson,stewart,spence and every other Rangers hating strategically placed person in the media, you really need to go to a mirror and look at yourself and say "What the fuck have I become" they know. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfredosgloves 84 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 7 minutes ago, BlueThunder said: Where did you get that? It was available on twitter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFamousPigeon 9,352 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, Dan Deacon said: That would be absolutely genius Canary trapping ^^ see above. It really really would. The SPL-thickos wouldn't see it coming either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wafflesniffer 399 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 John Nelms, having backtracked on the initial vote, offering to negotiate to get Dundee United and Raith Rovers to forego some monies,so it could be given to Partick Thistle and Stranraer, as well as arranging friendlies with big hitters, according to the document. Fucking scandalous. "Here, have some cash and shut the fuck up". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkster 4,804 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 1 minute ago, TheFamousPigeon said: Discussions of canary trapping going on with the document... Masterful if so. from whom? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie1963 2,348 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, BlueboyG said: I hope I'm correct mate but I can't see us putting our evidence out there , take it like a trial, the prosecution don't publish evidence until the trial so as not to give the upper hand to the defence, we will produce our evidence when required and as probably instructed by our lawyers. This I hope. We already know we aren't getting an EGM Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,461 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 1 minute ago, TheFamousPigeon said: Canary trapping ^^ see above. It really really would. The SPL-thickos wouldn't see it coming either. What's that all about talks about it where Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFamousPigeon 9,352 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, Malkster said: from whom? Us. We send out copies to each club; each with small small differences. When it eventually gets leaked we can then tell who did it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingKirk 25,461 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, TheFamousPigeon said: Us. We send out copies to each club; each with small small differences. When it eventually gets leaked we can then tell who did it. Forget my post above Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersInCanada 7,775 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, TheFamousPigeon said: Us. We send out copies to each club; each with small small differences. When it eventually gets leaked we can then tell who did it. You may well be right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkster 4,804 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 canary trap: don't really think it will be helpful, or tell us anything we didn't know already Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
don logan 8,023 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 As many have quickly gave their verdict on the document, why can't we summarise the main points, specific to why there should be an indpendent investigation? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFamousPigeon 9,352 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 1 minute ago, Malkster said: canary trap: don't really think it will be helpful, or tell us anything we didn't know already But if taken to court could be a legal mechanism that unlocks relationships between key stakeholders we are claiming are corrupt... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,911 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 13 minutes ago, McEwan's Lager said: Just had a quick scan through the linked FF Report. Some serious stuff in it. There’s questions of the entire SPFL board in there on Governance matters, not just the executive team. SFA getting brought into it too. I think the club have alot of evidence from the whistleblower. This dossier doesn't include much if any evidence. I think they are holding the evidence until the independent investigation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,287 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 1 minute ago, don logan said: As many have quickly gave their verdict on the document, why can't we summarise the main points, specific to why there should be an indpendent investigation? There absolutely should be an independent inquiry based on the dossier but if you have been following, there is nothing in it we all didn't already know. It won't pass. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,911 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 5 minutes ago, Dickie1963 said: This I hope. We already know we aren't getting an EGM This is all setup for a court. The EGM is just part of the course. It will be getting rejected any time now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetheart 8,458 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 2 minutes ago, don logan said: As many have quickly gave their verdict on the document, why can't we summarise the main points, specific to why there should be an indpendent investigation? The dossier is legally sensitive, It was strictly private and for member clubs only Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFamousPigeon 9,352 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 It would be beyond a masterstroke.... Let them build up media narratives and deflections. Create this big story around us and our bad behaviour, bullying etc etc Then secretly slip in a coded construct into the system knowing one or a few of them would leak it on the day. I'd love for us to have done it. I doubt it though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,911 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Far too many questions that need independently answered. Not by the SPFL or by hollicom paid bullshitters. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenzie Loyal 533 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Raman Bhardwaj@sportraman Rangers legal opinion: Neil Doncaster breached his duties in law as a director of the SPFL. Opinion also states Rangers have a reasonable good prospect of obtaining from court an order for the removal of Neil Doncaster as director and chief executive of SPFL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCDBigBear 10,763 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 1 hour ago, bluenoz said: The bold words show no proof, just speculation? Not good enough in my opinion. That is why we called for an investigation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 41,911 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Just now, TheFamousPigeon said: It would be beyond a masterstroke.... Let them build up media narratives and deflections. Create this big story around us and our bad behaviour, bullying etc etc Then secretly slip in a coded construct into the system knowing one or a few of them would leak it on the day. I'd love for us to have done it. I doubt it though. I noticed a slight error in the appendix of that version. Think we might be onto something.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.