Jump to content

Club statement | Resolution not deemed competent


Recommended Posts

Just now, TheFamousPigeon said:

What you're missing in that document though is the filling; the sustenance. 

The pdf presented the packaging and the bread slices mate... 

I get that it’s a summary but I’m seeing nothing that is alluding to hard evidence 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 27.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

WE have been presented with evidence via a whistleblower that raises serious concerns surrounding the SPFL’s processes relating to its stewardship of the voting on the resolution presented to member C

Hope you dont mind mate but thought I'd give the Hornets nest a wee stir...  

Posted Images

2 minutes ago, TheFamousPigeon said:

What you're missing in that document though is the filling; the sustenance. 

The pdf presented the packaging and the bread slices mate...  lubing us up for the big tasty meat thats to come.

God I hope so. But have doubts.

 

when the full shabang hits I’ll look for the breakdowns as I don’t have the concentration levels for 200 pages lol

Zappa6995 likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hutton2008 said:

We are supposed to have ‘evidence’ of bullying and corruption. 

If this summary is legit it’s been a waste of time.

Valid questions been asked but not what we were after

I haven't seen the document therefore can't comment fully but on what I have seen on here it is pretty much what I expected.  Nobody was ever going to be sacked today.   

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hutton2008 said:

I get that it’s a summary but I’m seeing nothing that is alluding to hard evidence 

So what's you're take on the two points I mentioned previously . What more evidence do you want ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Courtyard Bear said:

That would be up to a court to decide if  the allegations have any foundation, after the evidence is heard. 

We were supposed to show evidence today, not ask a lot of legit questions. An independent inquiry has got no chance for we didn't offer an exclusive.

The only option is court.

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

SFA getting brought into it too. I think the club have alot of evidence from the whistleblower. This dossier doesn't include much if any evidence. I think they are holding the evidence until the independent investigation.

 

7 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

Far too many questions that need independently answered. Not by the SPFL or by hollicom paid bullshitters.

 

6 minutes ago, JCDBigBear said:

That is why we called for an investigation.  

 

3 minutes ago, Hutton2008 said:

We are supposed to have ‘evidence’ of bullying and corruption. 

If this summary is legit it’s been a waste of time.

Valid questions been asked but not what we were after

 

2 minutes ago, TheFamousPigeon said:

What you're missing in that document though is the filling; the sustenance. 

The pdf presented the packaging and the bread slices mate... 

We aren't going to get an independent investigation though. 

This has been a stitch up from the start and as per usual we're the ones looking like absolute tits. 

Why wait weeks on end to publish this when nobody cares anymore? 

Tweeting shite like we won't be bullied etc, embarrassing. 

wully likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hutton2008 said:

God I hope so. But have doubts.

 

when the full shabang hits I’ll look for the breakdowns as I don’t have the concentration levels for 200 pages lol

It's not 200 pages.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TheFamousPigeon said:

What were you expecting?

Hard evidence.

Something irrefutable. Even an admission that there is hard evidence.

Judging the summary I can’t see this getting backed in a vote.

Granted I haven’t seen the 200 page document so jury remains out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Hutton2008 said:

Clubs cutting deals and lobbying other clubs isn’t against the rules and is perfectly legal. 

It becomes an issue is the spfl put Dundee up to it as part of a sweetheart deal.

Otherwise it matters not a jot.

Dirtiness on Dundee’s part, more reason to never take up away allocations in their junkie infested midden - yes, amounting to corruption - a stretch

if it meant agreeing talks about a 16 team league to squeeze them in before the vote had passed then that would be a big deal

Sweetheart likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, esquire8 said:

SFA getting brought into it too. I think the club have alot of evidence from the whistleblower. This dossier doesn't include much if any evidence. I think they are holding the evidence until the independent investigation.

I read it this way also, they are mainly laying out the ‘many’ issues that need serious addressing. I do think that a follow up paragraph outlining the fact that the evidence that we do hold (according to our releases thus far) will prove some if not all of the issues would have been wise though...

esquire8 and HG5 like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 03 December 2020 20:00 Until 22:00
      0  
      Rangers v Standard Liege
      Ibrox Stadium
      Europa League

×
×
  • Create New...