Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The Lance Armstrong of football.  rick roberts 2 days ago The Lance Armstrong of football. A common call from celtic fans desperate to try and overstate Rangers FC use of then-legal tax

...and entry to the lucrative Champions League... I've always suspected that the rush and process to get all this done, regardless of the consequences for others, has been the primary driving for

Posted Images

4 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Yeah but you want us to take legal action. What do you want us to do, what do you get him charged with?

We provided a dossier of evidence of malpractice, company law type breaches, and offered to pay for a financial investigation onto it all. We were still rebutted.

So dont just say get rid of Doncaster, that's what the club wwnt too. If you want to criticise the Board for shitting it, tell me what course of action specifically is open to them that they have shat out of.

Corruption. 

Blumhoilann and Howsitgoing like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said:

They have quoted that they have enough evidence to remove Doncaster from his role via court proceedings. 

Well why have they not started any legal action  against him ?  If they have the evidence then start legal proceedings and get rid of the cunt asap.

That's what we fans want.  Action not words as the boards words are always cheap and let us down. . 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, BlueKnight87 said:

They'll just find another reason not to implement it mate. 

We offer to cover the costs, you could just see a line like now is not the time to bring VAR into Scottish football during this crisis. 

Followed by media lapdogs demonizing VAR and how it's not good for the game etc. 

Earlier in the year that wee poof ping pong was interviewed and asked his thoughts on VAR he said he didn’t like it because it spoiled the game with some offside goals being highlighted 

Wee dicks been in the game 5 minutes and all of a sudden has an opinion that is respected 

VAR has its critics that can’t be denied ,But it’s generally the EPL version that gets most criticism ,I can see why they thought that all games should be judged by the same people in a centralised location but it’s not worked as well as other VAR systems 

I don’t think it will be too long before the use of VAR is standardised throughout the world ,When that happens there can be no excuse for our league not to adopt it 

And see if we did pay for it for the whole league ,How can it be seen as independent 😀😂

BlueKnight87 and HG5 like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

What specifically have they said on that point?

 

Just now, Copland bear said:

Well why have they not started any legal action  against him ?  If they have the evidence then start legal proceedings and get rid of the cunt asap.

That's what we fans want.  Action not words as the boards words are always cheap and let us down. . 

“In summing up, Rangers claim their legal advice is that they have a ‘reasonably good prospect of obtaining, from the court, an order for Mr Doncaster’s removal as director and Chief Executive.’“

The board fail to take this legal advice then they have let us down, again.

HG5, Copland bear and Bad Robot like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Howsitgoing said:

 

“In summing up, Rangers claim their legal advice is that they have a ‘reasonably good prospect of obtaining, from the court, an order for Mr Doncaster’s removal as director and Chief Executive.’“

The board fail to take this legal advice then they have let us down, again.

They should have started legal proceedings against him before they were gifted the title.    

Once again our board sitting on their hands left wanting.  

But then again the board won't put their hands in their own pockets.  

Howsitgoing likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Yeah weak as piss . He knows if he said this , he would definitely not be getting anymore of the big games 

From our perspective he definitely can’t get anymore games nevermind big ones ,We all know that the taigs get their cages rattled if we get anything in any game we play ,The cup game against Hamilton with the Goldson hand ball incident the cunts were spewing and filling the phone ins 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Copland bear said:

They should have started legal proceedings against him before they were gifted the title.    

Once again our board sitting on their hands left wanting.  

But then again the board won't put their hands in their own pockets.  

What, like by offering to pay for independent investigations?

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Copland bear said:

They should have started legal proceedings against him before they were gifted the title.    

Once again our board sitting on their hands left wanting.  

But then again the board won't put their hands in their own pockets.  

I disagree with you there, think they are doing the right thing going through all available procedures. Maybe they are currently continuing this via SFA and that’s holding up the court case, it would be good to hear a statement from them informing us of what’s going on. It’s not as if we can rely on the media to keep us up to date.

Bad Robot and magic8ball like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Copland bear said:

They should have started legal proceedings against him before they were gifted the title.    

Once again our board sitting on their hands left wanting.  

But then again the board won't put their hands in their own pockets.  

We don’t know if they have or haven’t started any process yet 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said:

 

“In summing up, Rangers claim their legal advice is that they have a ‘reasonably good prospect of obtaining, from the court, an order for Mr Doncaster’s removal as director and Chief Executive.’“

The board fail to take this legal advice then they have let us down, again.

That was said in relation to getting the independent investigation resolution supported. It failed.

It may well be the case that there is still sufficient evidence to proceed with court action, but it's as likely that the findings from an independent investigation are crucial to support such action.

The club have tried to move it away from being a Rangers v spfl fight, I'd imagine theres strength in numbers complaining about company law issues. As soon as we as a club take action that so few others support, we're in a weaker legal position and the club will be aware of this. I hope they take action but doing it alone with only a reasonably good prospect of success is a dangerous strategy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don’t know if I’m late to the party in all of this but folk on FF are saying Rangers and Hearts rejected the proposal to end the season early.

However as we are all aware the SPFL released a statement saying it was unanimous.

Rangers need to come out and clarify what their stance was and if they in fact did vote to end the season ASAP.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, B1872 said:

Don’t know if I’m late to the party in all of this but folk on FF are saying Rangers and Hearts rejected the proposal to end the season early.

However as we are all aware the SPFL released a statement saying it was unanimous.

Rangers need to come out and clarify what their stance was and if they in fact did vote to end the season ASAP.

Article in the Express yesterday basically stating that the vote was not unanimous as the SPFL claimed.

Blumhoilann likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

We have said we have a reasonably good prospect. That is distinctly different from saying we have enough evidence to remove Doncaster.

 They have a ‘reasonably good prospect of obtaining, from the court, an order for Mr Doncaster’s removal as director and Chief Executive.’ If we go to court and fail then that’s one thing but if we ignore advice that I believe has come from a QC saying that we have a reasonable good prospect of removing Doncaster then they have let us down. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

Article in the Express yesterday basically stating that the vote was not unanimous as the SPFL claimed.

I'm guessing that we agreed there was no likelihood of getting games played within a certain timescale (fair enough if it was in the next month or so) and the spfl manipulated this to say we and others unanimously supported the scum getting awarded the title. We didn't as we voted against that.

It's a play on words pur Board could easily clarify. Not that it'll change anything.

scottyscott1963 likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Howsitgoing said:

 They have a ‘reasonably good prospect of obtaining, from the court, an order for Mr Doncaster’s removal as director and Chief Executive.’ If we go to court and fail then that’s one thing but if we ignore advice that I believe has come from a QC saying that we have a reasonable good prospect of removing Doncaster then they have let us down. 

So because we dont know what the club are doing in a legal context about a matter we have a prospect of winning (not the same as saying we have sufficient evidence and it's a categorical certainty) then it's a fair assumption we've shat it?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 25 October 2020 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Livingston
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...