Jump to content

SPFL Shambles


dummiesoot

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, esquire8 said:

Hes the most biased reference in Scottish football history. And that's saying something. 

Been quite a few last 5/9 years mate . after the OF loss , I had made my mind up about him . He has taken over from Thompson . Bought and paid for

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eejay the dj said:

Colum , Clancy , Walsh

Beaton , Madden and Mclean . these will be the 6 cunts that get all our big games next season . And the scums

And that scares me to death

Talking about refs is slightly off topic. I used to argue that is was mere incompetence.  I was wrong. It's a clear agenda.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 6superbarry6 said:

No confidence vote now ffs, this vote shows the clubs have no faith in the cunts 

I might be wrong, but is there not a time bar on when you can call a vote of no confidence? Thought it was 12 months.

I seem to remember something like that back from the time when King was fighting with Llambias and the Easdales, there was a vote of no confidence or something that was lost, with them remaining in power, and there being a 12 month block on another motion being put forward.

Not sure if the rules are the same with the SPFL or even if none of the above actually happened and im actually making it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, GersInCanada said:

Probably thinking about whether to call in the fraud squad or not. 

The cabal being escorted from the premises in handcuffs would make the wait worthwhile.

It was my understanding that if all three members of the panel did not agree then it is straight back to court, the fact the SPFL (maybe even the SFA) threatened them with punitive punishments or removal of licence surely makes the case alone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how I feel about the possible increase in subs bench. On the one hand it could help us as we have a bigger squad than everyone bar the filth. On the other hand, there is a drop off of levels in our non first-team compared to the filth. They might benefit more from it than us in that sense, whereas we might have a better overall top 14. I’m kinda undecided on this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlueThunder said:

Not sure how I feel about the possible increase in subs bench. On the one hand it could help us as we have a bigger squad than everyone bar the filth. On the other hand, there is a drop off of levels in our non first-team compared to the filth. They might benefit more from it than us in that sense, whereas we might have a better overall top 14. I’m kinda undecided on this one.

It plays into their hands massively IMO.

I dont like the idea at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jamie0202 said:

Their second string isn't nearly as strong as it is made out to be as was proven last week in France when all the excuses came out. 

Our second string isnt nearly a good as its made out to be either, only everyone says that ours is fucking gash to begin with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jamie0202 said:

Their second string isn't nearly as strong as it is made out to be as was proven last week in France when all the excuses came out. 

Possibly but I do think our overall fitness was better than them. Adding more subs will have an effect on that too.

I guess I’d feel better if our second string wasn’t so patchy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said:

I think 5 subs will be a negative for us. Gives teams more chance to freshen the side when tired late on.

You've misread the rule. Its like kids fitba, if a team is struggling, they add in extra players. We'll end up playing against 16 not 11 😁

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said:

I think 5 subs will be a negative for us. Gives teams more chance to freshen the side when tired late on.

Remember it can be quite disruptive to a team  having a large amount of subs.

So they can operate their super subs in whatever way they deem suitable

FSIFSO    (First shite in, first shite out)

LSIFSO    (Last shite in, first shite out)

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Rangers_no1 said:

I think 5 subs will be a negative for us. Gives teams more chance to freshen the side when tired late on.

Don't think 'freshen' describes it right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, esquire8 said:

Class but expected. More fun and games this season then.

Does this mean the SPFL can't use season 20/21 prize pot to clean up the mess they made with season 19/20. E.g clubs with have to vote on any compensation pay outs 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Sweetheart said:

Does this mean the SPFL can't use season 20/21 prize pot to clean up the mess they made with season 19/20. E.g clubs with have to vote on any compensation pay outs 

Afraid not. SPFL board still have the power to use the pot to clean up the mess the clubs voted for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Sweetheart said:

Does this mean the SPFL can't use season 20/21 prize pot to clean up the mess they made with season 19/20. E.g clubs with have to vote on any compensation pay outs 

The resolution related only to terminating the league however and whenever they saw fit should circumstances similar to this season occur again next season, afaik.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 30 March 2024 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hibernian
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...