Jump to content

Officialdom Conspiracy 2020/21?


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Blue Avenger said:

Yes we would, but it should not stop us using official channels and making it public that we have done so.

Use the means at our disposal and if there are none, then call for change to make sure there is one.

We dont really know what official channels we use if any. Part of the issue is that publicly criticising the officials or their body leads to charges. Its a closed shop in terms of complaining unless you're across the city.

magic8ball likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Clancy providing zero protection to Rangers players. Guy's never just an  incompetent ref, he's fucking bent.

To think we used to sing 'Its a Conspiracy'...

The thing is none of us are asking for favours, dubious decisions going our way, we want the big decisions to be correct. Even though we did not play well yesterday, we can't play well every matc

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Robmc1 said:

If they just got it out there in a ‘between the lines’ fashion, at least the fans would know that they see what we all do, surely some neutrals or English media would latch on to it.

Agreed re the SFA, they are also heavily influenced by place men imo who do not favour ourselves, frustrating but more frustrating doing nothing...

I think the club need to keep complaining to the official channels and make a short fan update after it's done so.  At least that way, fans will know the club hasn't given up on trying to rid corruption out of the game.

kelvd1873 likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

Now that Morelos looks to be away who'll take over for the red cards this season?

My money's on Itten or Aribo. 

I think they'll pick on Hagi because he potentially is the one that can improve his value the most.  The amount of times Morelos has been booked too harshly for stuff other players get away with is bewildering, I often wonder if opposition players were winding him up for a sneaky bet on red.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We are damned if we do and damned if we dont, so imo Club have to just go for it and use both the official quiet approach thru the official channels but also use the post match interviews too.  Simple “ disappointed” in refs performance statements! “Don’t understand that decision” comments!  Keep chipping away at them!  

Bears likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Typed in Rangers fc and look where the path can take you using google 

Look at the shite that this mob are clearly controlling .

And when typing in Rangers .Apparently people then look for the scums superstore 😂😂😂 

They don't run Google. 

GlasgowRangersFC likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Typed in Rangers fc and look where the path can take you using google 

Look at the shite that this mob are clearly controlling .

8A585D52-EC6C-4061-A8D6-B1CDF8A346C9.jpeg

5A66C420-6D51-4605-AF4D-5FCB8BB6C64B.jpeg

4252E688-EACB-4996-980C-150108B54C04.jpeg

CCA59485-71EF-4C6A-A100-EBE54D331F88.jpeg

8FB3CE95-2CD2-400A-99CB-7F3F8062FF11.jpeg

7704A095-859D-44F6-AB0A-CC069A37C51A.jpeg

03172D51-E9ED-4129-B20F-0A0E3C5F6511.jpeg

99ABBC21-D577-40B7-AFD1-E17D2F9F092E.jpeg

778608A6-7B5A-455C-A43B-A8FDBE96D7A5.jpeg

By 'where the path can take you' you mean you searched Rangers, then clicked on the taig badge straight away because it came up in the people also search for box.

Lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, eejay the dj said:

Typed in Rangers fc and look where the path can take you using google 

Look at the shite that this mob are clearly controlling .

8A585D52-EC6C-4061-A8D6-B1CDF8A346C9.jpeg

5A66C420-6D51-4605-AF4D-5FCB8BB6C64B.jpeg

4252E688-EACB-4996-980C-150108B54C04.jpeg

CCA59485-71EF-4C6A-A100-EBE54D331F88.jpeg

8FB3CE95-2CD2-400A-99CB-7F3F8062FF11.jpeg

7704A095-859D-44F6-AB0A-CC069A37C51A.jpeg

03172D51-E9ED-4129-B20F-0A0E3C5F6511.jpeg

99ABBC21-D577-40B7-AFD1-E17D2F9F092E.jpeg

778608A6-7B5A-455C-A43B-A8FDBE96D7A5.jpeg

Never got that tbh. Got some newspaper links, the Rangers wiki page and some results from recent fixtures. 

You're not suggesting though they're influencing or worse controlling Google are you?

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, AlbertzLoyalRSC said:

By 'where the path can take you' you mean you searched Rangers, then clicked on the taig badge straight away because it came up in the people also search for box.

Lol.

It was the comments below that I was alluding too 

A bit more opinionated than factual   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant criticise any of the yellows or the red but:

1. Our 1st goal imo was offside. As it comes off Roofes head Hagi is offside imo

Edit. Came off the defender so legit goal 👍

2. Penalty not given for push on Roofe. A CF is entitled to keep his hands out to protect his space. Thats not pushing or commiting a foul. He was shoved in the back as he went for the ball. 100% penalty.

magic8ball and Sweetheart like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Cant criticise any of the yellows or the red but:

1. Our 1st goal imo was offside. As it comes off Roofes head Hagi is offside imo

2. Penalty not given for push on Roofe. A CF is entitled to keep his hands out to protect his space. Thats not pushing or commiting a foul. He was shoved in the back as he went for the ball. 100% penalty.

He tried to say Roofe pushed the defender when he clearly did not. It was 100% a penalty. Apart from that, I thought Collum was fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Cant criticise any of the yellows or the red but:

1. Our 1st goal imo was offside. As it comes off Roofes head Hagi is offside imo

2. Penalty not given for push on Roofe. A CF is entitled to keep his hands out to protect his space. Thats not pushing or commiting a foul. He was shoved in the back as he went for the ball. 100% penalty.

Thought Hagi was offside when I seen it live but  I'm not sure if Roofe got a touch or it was the defender that flicked it anyway the assistant couldn't see it from where he was so glad he guessed our way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...