Jump to content

Officialdom Conspiracy 2020/21?


Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, Junior Soprano said:

He’s just poor ffs. He’s been drafted in for the juniors 

He is weak, it’s not poor that didn’t allow him to give clear red cards, clear penalties, and just general wrong calls when it comes to decisions that would of been in our favour. It’s a fear of the media if he was to wrongly give a decision in our favour and also the embarrassment of the compliance officer questioning and possibly reversing a decision he made whilst knowing that make an incorrect decision that’s detrimental to us will not suffer any consequence whatsoever.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Clancy providing zero protection to Rangers players. Guy's never just an  incompetent ref, he's fucking bent.

To think we used to sing 'Its a Conspiracy'...

I think you’ll find that Bolingoli is a separate entity so celtic cannot be responsible  infact he changed his name by deed poll to St Patrick Bolingoli earlier today

Posted Images

22 minutes ago, Howsitgoing said:

He is weak, it’s not poor that didn’t allow him to give clear red cards, clear penalties, and just general wrong calls when it comes to decisions that would of been in our favour. It’s a fear of the media if he was to wrongly give a decision in our favour and also the embarrassment of the compliance officer questioning and possibly reversing a decision he made whilst knowing that make an incorrect decision that’s detrimental to us will not suffer any consequence whatsoever.  

The ref didn’t lose us the game last night 

TamCoopz likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Sweetheart said:

Why shouldn't they be questioned if there are big decisions that alter game play? I'm sure that when the team sit down to talk about what went wrong, they'll be questioning some of the refs decisions and how it effected their play.

I'm far from saying they shouldn't be questioned.

I'm saying  we need to be good enough on the day to overcome poor / questionably biased decisions, and not get involved in shite that also gives the CO scope to hammer us.

Sweetheart likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the referee decisions becoming more transparent because we have been less commanding in games or have we become less commanding in games because of the referee decisions. I can’t make up my mind on that one. 

One things certain, the fenians needed a change of direction and the control they have of the SFA/SPFL is borderline corruption.  The compliance officer has now involved herself. 

kelvd1873 likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Quiet Jim said:

Goldson one was a shocker. In rugby taking out a player deliberately in mid air is a red. That wee cunt knew what he was doing and ref ignored it.

Spot on m8.....you have to laugh how things are perceived in the laws of the game....now Morelos deserved his two match ban for his act of stupidity.....last night I witnessed 1 player (Goldson) jump for the ball when another player (kane) deliberately barges into him when he is off balance and endangering the opponent to serious injury with an awkward fall!!!

In certain peoples eyes they will look at those two incidents and claim that the Morelos incident was more reckless....my fucking arse, kane knew exactly what he was doing and walks away without so much as a finger wagging :confused:

Quiet Jim and Sweetheart like this
Link to post
Share on other sites

He could of easily been badly injured, possibly even dislocating a shoulder and it was completely intentional, against St Mirren Balagon was barged intentionally too, but not quite as dangerous because he wasn't jumping at the time.

Ref also ignored Hagi having his shirt pulled for ages, and numerous fouls on Kent.

Since we played Utd, teams are getting dirtier, and refs are turning a blind eye to it.

Bad Robot likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites

The officials seemed to get a few minor decisions the wrong way round but nothing major.

Foul on Goldson imo should have been a yellow. Both fouls by O'Halloran were yellows. Kent didn't get fouls often given. Id have liked to have seen better angles on a couple of offside calls. No major dramas tbh.

 

Robmc1 likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites

4 contentious penalty shouts yesterday.

1. Tav. Imo he makes contact with their player's standing leg, the boy didn't bring him down. No pen 

2. Boyle (?). Tav chasing him in the box, Nisbet sees this and pushes Tav slightly off balance into Boyle creating the contact. No pen.

3. Hagi. His boot is high, but the ball is there to be won. He's not made the slightest contact with their player. It would have been harsh for the high boot, there's actually more of an argument for simulation by their player going down holding his face and trying to seek advantage when no contact made. Seen them given, its a 50/50 one.

4. Porteous. IMHO the biggest penalty shout. He isn't fully in control, his leg is resting on the ball whilst his foot takes out Roofe. Very lucky the ball was still close to him as he shifted his position to clear. Another 50/50 one for me.

Don't think any are stonewallers as being claimed. Thoughts?

magic8ball likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

4 contentious penalty shouts yesterday.

1. Tav. Imo he makes contact with their player's standing leg, the boy didn't bring him down. No pen 

2. Boyle (?). Tav chasing him in the box, Nisbet sees this and pushes Tav slightly off balance into Boyle creating the contact. No pen.

3. Hagi. His boot is high, but the ball is there to be won. He's not made the slightest contact with their player. It would have been harsh for the high boot, there's actually more of an argument for simulation by their player going down holding his face and trying to seek advantage when no contact made. Seen them given, its a 50/50 one.

4. Porteous. IMHO the biggest penalty shout. He isn't fully in control, his leg is resting on the ball whilst his foot takes out Roofe. Very lucky the ball was still close to him as he shifted his position to clear. Another 50/50 one for me.

Don't think any are stonewallers as being claimed. Thoughts?

Hagi one was a stonewaller because Andy Walker says so .

In all seriousness your right with 3 and 4 ,50/50 on both ,which in the real world means half the time you get them and half the time you don’t.

Both sides would have been pretty pissed off if the other had got one of those given without getting a penalty themselves .

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

4 contentious penalty shouts yesterday.

1. Tav. Imo he makes contact with their player's standing leg, the boy didn't bring him down. No pen 

2. Boyle (?). Tav chasing him in the box, Nisbet sees this and pushes Tav slightly off balance into Boyle creating the contact. No pen.

3. Hagi. His boot is high, but the ball is there to be won. He's not made the slightest contact with their player. It would have been harsh for the high boot, there's actually more of an argument for simulation by their player going down holding his face and trying to seek advantage when no contact made. Seen them given, its a 50/50 one.

4. Porteous. IMHO the biggest penalty shout. He isn't fully in control, his leg is resting on the ball whilst his foot takes out Roofe. Very lucky the ball was still close to him as he shifted his position to clear. Another 50/50 one for me.

Don't think any are stonewallers as being claimed. Thoughts?

I thought 4 was a penalty as Porteous gets a run on Tav to get in front and whilst I don’t think he means to trip him, he does catch him by trying to get in front of him.

Difficult for officials to see but if VAR was an option think it would have been awarded.

Thought Collum was his usual officious self but any 50/50 they were given the benefit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, magic8ball said:

Nothing major wrong ,But the referee in general was brutal .

Bang on, no major decisions but his inability to get a card out let some poor challenges continue especially on Hagi & Kent.

Just shocked he never booked Alfie as pretty sure he has in every other game 😂

Bears and magic8ball like this
Link to post
Share on other sites

All I'm hearing today is how hibs we're denied a blatant penalty and might have got another.

ezgif-com-gif-maker.gif

I never watched Sportscene last night, but if anybody did, what was their take on this " tackle "

Watching the game yesterday I thought Tav's penalty claim was a greater stonewaller.

Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Vision said:

All I'm hearing today is how hibs we're denied a blatant penalty and might have got another.

ezgif-com-gif-maker.gif

I never watched Sportscene last night, but if anybody did, what was their take on this " tackle "

Watching the game yesterday I thought Tav's penalty claim was a greater stonewaller.

Seeing that again in slowmo thats a penalty. His left leg slides over the top of the ball and takes out Roofe. He only brings the ball under control after that with his right foot. Clear penalty in hindsight.

Bears and AGC123 like this
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 12 May 2021 17:00 Until 19:00
      0  
      Livingston v Rangers
      Tony Macaroni Arena
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...