Jump to content

Officialdom Conspiracy 2020/21?


Recommended Posts

Just now, Shetland Bear said:

Wonder if Obika’s elbow will be looked at retrospectively by the CO... knew exactly what he was doing.

You could guarantee that if they were playing the scum in the next couple of games, it would be a fast track suspension. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brackley Bluenose said:

He’s pulled the guy back as he’s attacking in the final third. Nailed on yellow. Doesn’t matter if it’s your first foul or not.

 

It would massively improve Scottish football if those sort of tackles, when somebody has been done all ends up, were yellows.

Maybe for us Goldson might have got a yellow also. However I think I lost count of St Mirren's "yellow" count around 8 or 9.

Similarly the ref's yellow for Obika is inexplicable, after Morelos had his yellow upgraded. Obika on Goldson was almost identical. But teams have been getting away with this for ages. Multiple Motherwell scumbags were in the media with impunity after Bowman broke Cardoso's nose. Accusing him of diving, play acting and whatever else. 

You could accept Tav getting a yellow, Gerrard getting pulled up for media comments or Morelos being upgraded to a red if their was consistency. Though consistency would mean a certain player from a certain team spending most of the season watching from the stands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just watched sportscene.  The match highlights showed:

1. a probable handball in the box by the scum at 1 nil up - not given. 

2. A clear stamp and deserved yellow card by Edouard in the build up to their 2nd - ignored 

3. A possible push by Bitton in the box - not given.

 

Not only didctge scum get none of these decisions awarded against them, none were reviewed in the highlights section.

Typical Collum. Typical Sportscene.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Why?

Its no more than what was given.

The intent was there with Obika, similar to Morelos and I would say with more force. It is the exact same thing. The CO must hand him a two game suspension or else there are different rules for different players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dickie said:

Are you just trying to be an Uncle Tom,strange how you disagree with almost every event mentioned,thank fuck you don’t referee our games.

🤣

Morelos jumped at the man and needlessly swung a forearm at him. Miles from the same issues.

Tbh it was more like the recent one he genuinely challenged for the ball and a poster crazily berated him for. 

Players can use their arm as leverage ffs, sometimes they get booked, they're absolutely not all reds or deserved retrospective reds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

The intent was there with Obika, similar to Morelos and I would say with more force. It is the exact same thing. The CO must hand him a two game suspension or else there are different rules for different players.

Pish tbh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluenoz said:

There is intent there. He knew what he was doing.

If he was in the air leading with his elbow, yes. If he raised his elbow above shoulder height to an opponents head height, yes. If he saw Goldson and swung an elbow at him yes. None of that happened.

He backed in, used his frame and felt Goldson, extended his arm back carelessly which made contact with Golddon who had his head reasonably low. 

Its not a red ffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluenoz said:

There is intent there. He knew what he was doing.

Backs in, backs in. Feels Goldson there. Realises he's missing the ball. Throws the elbow. Looked a red at the time. Absolutely stick on red slowed down. 

Consistency would have that upgraded in a flash. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BlueFrewExile said:

Backs in, backs in. Feels Goldson there. Realises he's missing the ball. Throws the elbow. Looked a red at the time. Absolutely stick on red slowed down. 

Consistency would have that upgraded in a flash. 

When the contact is made, Goldsons head is about a foot higher than where he then gets elbowed in the face.

Link to post
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said:

Just watched sportscene.  The match highlights showed:

1. a probable handball in the box by the scum at 1 nil up - not given. 

2. A clear stamp and deserved yellow card by Edouard in the build up to their 2nd - ignored 

3. A possible push by Bitton in the box - not given.

 

Not only didctge scum get none of these decisions awarded against them, none were reviewed in the highlights section.

Typical Collum. Typical Sportscene.

It’s ok, I’m sure Jim Goodwin will speak up in a press interview soon about referees being brave enough to give decisions re point 3...

Seriously though, I’ve just watched their highlights and they are still a shambles at the back, Dundee should have at least scored 2 with more composed finishing, I don’t see them packing out their defence at the weekend and think they will be there for the taking...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluenoz said:

If there was no intent and it was accidental like you suggest then why did he not apologize to Goldson when he saw he was injured. Cunt knew exactly what he was doing.

Yup, where was his elbow going after he'd backed in and knew where Goldson was?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Upcoming Events

    • 30 March 2024 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Hibernian
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership
×
×
  • Create New...