Jump to content

Forfeit game! Points deduction.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 815
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Bolingoli was ineligible.  2 European precedents where celtic themselves complaint on minor technical infringements.  Precedent when registered players play if ineligible eg suspended.  

No sure about points deduction, but the thing that irks me is this "Scottish football on a yellow card" pish. We done fuck all wrong. A tarrier commits a foul and we're all booked.

Should automatically forfeit games and opposing team gets awarded 3-0 wins, other clubs shouldn’t be at a disadvantage because others can’t control their players 

Posted Images

Just now, raging blue 1972 said:

if he had to quarantine and played then of course he is unless played via zoom lol

He's not. You can repeat it as many times as you want, it doesn't make it true. If he was ineligible, why no charge for fielding an ineligible player? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's irrelevant whether they knew about his travel or not.

They gained an unfair advantage by playing someone who should be in quarantine.

No other club is allowed, intentionally or not to select players under this circumstance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Colin Traive said:

So they tell the players where they’re going (eg away to Lazio last season) and the players all make their own bookings, presumably claiming back through expenses?

:lol:

What happens when the international teams need them then for their away games? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Dude said:

He's not. You can repeat it as many times as you want, it doesn't make it true. If he was ineligible, why no charge for fielding an ineligible player? 

so the whole Rangers squad could go on a jolly weekend to spain etc, come back and play on the wednesday and they are not ineligible to play?

if that is the case then its fucked up

five stars likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, raging blue 1972 said:

if he had to quarantine and played then of course he is unless played via zoom lol

This is the part I don't understand. 

What am I not getting?

If someone is in quarantine does that make them eligible to play? has the definition of this term changed literally overnight since celtic have been cited? 

If it's illegal for him to play, he's still ineligible. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Dude said:

He's not. You can repeat it as many times as you want, it doesn't make it true. If he was ineligible, why no charge for fielding an ineligible player? 

Because the SFA or SPFL haven't amended their rules to keep up with Covid times although they seem to change the rules on the fly when it suits them.

The boy participated in the game illegally under gov't quarantine rules and therefore was ineligible.

That logic seems beyond you or more likely, you are one bored fucker who takes the alternative view to amuse yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, The Dude said:

No. By removing the player from their 25-man player list and replacing him with someone else while he served his suspension, they tried to game the system and it bit them on the arse.

UEFA delegate wasn't complicit. Its down to the club to ensure the player is eligible to play.

If they had deliberately flouted the rules there is no way they would have brought him on when the tie was effectively won.

 

British_Empire likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, five stars said:

It's irrelevant whether they knew about his travel or not.

They gained an unfair advantage by playing someone who should be in quarantine.

No other club is allowed, intentionally or not to select players under this circumstance.

Don’t really see how they gained an advantage tbh 😂😂

five stars likes this
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, raging blue 1972 said:

so the whole Rangers squad could go on a jolly weekend to spain etc, come back and play on the wednesday and they are not ineligible to play?

if that is the case then its fucked up

Yes. Their eligibility to play relates to them being registered to play and not being subject to a suspension.

Eligibility covers a very narrow scope in terms of their registration.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, graeme_4 said:

Might be a stupid question, or might have missed it, but if celtic didn’t know about it. Who did? 

And, how did the story break? 

and why is the information as to when and where he returned to shroud in secrecy?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any Club which

(i) Plays a Player who is not eligible to Play;

(ii) Plays a Player in circumstances which are not in accordance with the Rules and/or Regulations; and/or

(iii) applies to Scottish FA Register a Player without the consent of the Board where such consent is required by the Rules or Regulations, shall be in breach of these Regulations

Did celtic play a player in accordance with the current rules & regulations?

Doesn't health & safety & government ruling trump SPFL rules?

Dave Hedgehog and bluenoz like this
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Real Ranger said:

If they had deliberately flouted the rules there is no way they would have brought him on when the tie was effectively won.

 

Legia even took it to CAS demanding compensation or reinstatement and were laughed out of the place.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, raging blue 1972 said:

so the whole Rangers squad could go on a jolly weekend to spain etc, come back and play on the wednesday and they are not ineligible to play?

if that is the case then its fucked up

@thedude

and to further add if this is the case can we do it now and get the league stopped and be awarded the championship

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 25 October 2020 15:00 Until 17:00
      0  
      Rangers v Livingston
      Ibrox Stadium
      Scottish Premiership

×
×
  • Create New...