Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 A player who legally can’t play football is ineligible to play football. 3-0 to Kilmarnock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Real Ranger said: To answer your question, I agree they should have had 24. They obviously made a mistake believing he was eligible for the second leg. If they had deliberately flouted the rules they would have to had believed he was crucial to the chances of them getting a result ( he clearly wasn’t ) and if not starting him bringing him on if the tie was in the balance. The fact they brought him on at 6-1 with 2 minutes remaining is all the evidence anyone needs to realise they had made an honest mistake over his eligibility to play. So if you agree they should have had 24, do you agree that by taking him out of the squad and replacing him with someone else in a bid to circumvent losing a player to suspension they have deliberately flouted the rules? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 The only way the SPFL would award Kilmarnock a 3-0 win v the bheast is if the real game ad finished 3-0 or more to Kilmarnock. Just like the ban on Ryan Christie when he was already out injured. If you get me 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, Dave Hedgehog said: A player who legally can’t play football is ineligible to play football. 3-0 to Kilmarnock. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,193 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, The Dude said: So if you agree they should have had 24, do you agree that by taking him out of the squad and replacing him with someone else in a bid to circumvent losing a player to suspension they have deliberately flouted the rules? No, on the evidence of them not bringing him on to the field with tie won they clearly had made a stupid and costly administrative error. Can you think of any reason why they would bring him on at that stage knowing it could make any punishment if caught more severe? Just one good reason Dude. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,832 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Dave Hedgehog said: The only way the SPFL would award Kilmarnock a 3-0 win v the bheast is if the real game ad finished 3-0 or more to Kilmarnock. Just like the ban on Ryan Christie when he was already out injured. If you get me 😂 If Eduardo had gotten injured a few minutes after putting a hand on the defenders face, I guarantee he would have been suspended. A hand to the face is considered violent conduct. Violent conduct is a red card. Anyone who thinks it wasn't contact to his face needs glasses. I will admit the defender embellished the incident. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForeverAndEver 71,469 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 3-0 results aren't automatic for ineligible players, Liverpool got a big fine, and Hearts got given a fine and a draw instead of the win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 7 minutes ago, The Dude said: 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, Real Ranger said: No, on the evidence of them not bringing him on to the field with tie won they clearly had made a stupid and costly administrative error. Can you think of any reason why they would bring him on at that stage knowing it could make any punishment if caught more severe? Just one good reason Dude. Because they thought they'd pulled a fast one and got around his suspension. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, Dave Hedgehog said: 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,540 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 16 minutes ago, The Dude said: So if you agree they should have had 24, do you agree that by taking him out of the squad and replacing him with someone else in a bid to circumvent losing a player to suspension they have deliberately flouted the rules? See this is the part i dont understand, why is the club being punished twice for a player being suspended, do any national FA's have this rule that a player must be squad registered for a game for it to serve a suspension Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,193 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: Because they thought they'd pulled a fast one and got around his suspension. So the coach with his team, 6-1 up and 2 minutes remaining turns to his assistant and says we’ve got away with, be a shame not to put him on now. Your argument is bonkers. Would you have been at ease if celtic got all 3 points if the player in question had came on and scored the winner? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 7 minutes ago, Jimbeamjunior said: See this is the part i dont understand, why is the club being punished twice for a player being suspended, do any national FA's have this rule that a player must be squad registered for a game for it to serve a suspension Every league that has defined squad lists do, yeah. Scotland doesn't have them. The PL does, La Liga as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 9 minutes ago, Real Ranger said: So the coach with his team, 6-1 up and 2 minutes remaining turns to his assistant and says we’ve got away with, be a shame not to put him on now. Your argument is bonkers. Would you have been at ease if celtic got all 3 points if the player in question had came on and scored the winner? It's not my argument, its the findings of the Court of Arbitration for Sport after Legia appealed UEFA's decision. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared Documents/3703-O.pdf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,193 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: It's not my argument, its the findings of the Court of Arbitration for Sport after Legia appealed UEFA's decision. https://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/Shared Documents/3703.pdf Not like you to dodge a question. Happy enough to give your opinion on why a team would flout the rule right enough. Ps I’ve never heard a manager say it’s an uphill task because we only have 24 players rather than 25 to select from. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Done with this thread. Fuck celtic Hope no one is offended by that 😳 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, Real Ranger said: Not like you to dodge a question. Happy enough to give your opinion on why a team would flout the rule right enough. Ps I’ve never heard a manager say it’s an uphill task because we only have 24 players rather than 25 to select from. I couldn't have cared if Bolingoli had scored the winner. It's two games into the season and he was eligible to play. He didn't score though so it is utterly irrelevant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 1 minute ago, The Dude said: I couldn't have cared if Bolingoli had scored the winner. It's two games into the season and he was eligible to play. He didn't score though so it is utterly irrelevant. Couldn’t have cared if they had scored a winner? I reckon that’s where you differ from every other member on here. Get that to fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 5 minutes ago, Dave Hedgehog said: Done with this thread. Fuck celtic Hope no one is offended by that 😳 1 minute ago, Dave Hedgehog said: Couldn’t have cared if they had scored a winner? I reckon that’s where you differ from every other member on here. Get that to fuck. Four minutes. Impressive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Hedgehog 10,673 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Can you actually block someone on here? Ignore doesn’t do the job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Ranger 3,193 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 2 minutes ago, The Dude said: I couldn't have cared if Bolingoli had scored the winner. It's two games into the season and he was eligible to play. He didn't score though so it is utterly irrelevant. With his actions being deemed so serious if it happens again Scottish football will be halted I’m sure our league body could find a suitable punishment, after all they’re no strangers to making the rules up as they go along Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, Real Ranger said: With his actions and those of the eight Aberdeen players being deemed so serious if it happens again Scottish football will be halted I’m sure our league body could find a suitable punishment, after all they’re no strangers to making the rules up as they go along Fixed that for you. Making rules up as they go along is literally whats happened for them to cite the two clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 3 minutes ago, Dave Hedgehog said: Can you actually block someone on here? Ignore doesn’t do the job. Fuck me, you still pretending you have me on ignore after replying to my posts for the last fuck knows how long? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaiserJon 12,393 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, The Dude said: Fuck me, you still pretending you have me on ignore after replying to my posts for the last fuck knows how long? This is nothing to do with this thread but did you have your Ibrox pass taken off you? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dude 20,026 Posted August 15, 2020 Share Posted August 15, 2020 Just now, badjon said: This is nothing to do with this thread but did you have your Ibrox pass taken off you? Not quite. I didn't have one for the first-team but was in the process before that was yanked but it also means it kills off the Colts stuff I've been doing for the last four years when the club couldn't be fucked because "nobody is interested in it." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.