Michael Stewart At It Again

[Goianegra 4,680]

Basically what hes saying is: "What has been said is spot on but we're not allowed to say it." 🤦‍♂️

[chris182 6,253]

1 hour ago, Laudrupsleftfoot said:

Ooft, ban incoming.

Fuck sake I meant the opposite 😂

[chris182 6,253]

53 minutes ago, Robmc1 said:

He’s an employee of celtic tv, this is not compatible with giving any impartial commentary on a public funded media platform...

My bad meant the opposite obvs 👀

[Fergie_6 1,078]

That crack is taking it toll in the junkie fucker. 

[miracle 7,777]

His mum should have swallowed.

[molesmole 1,020]

Can never trust a cunt wi too much eyelids! 

Weird ginger dyed blond side parting virgin!

[blueballss 2,965]

1 hour ago, miracle said:

His mum should have swallowed.

should have just let it drip down her leg

[BlueKnight87 17,267]

He's just a bitter prick. How can a man paid by scum fc still be considered impartial. 

 

[6superbarry6 14,121]

The cunts got see through eye lashes who gives a fuck what he thinks 

[DeanMK 4,641]

2 hours ago, Prso's headband said:

Unfortunately he isn’t though as he has numerous platforms to spout this agenda which informs public opinion. 

He can spout as much as he wants. Shouldn't make a difference to us. He's a walloper who aspires to be a carbon copy of Chris Sutton. Completely and utterly irrelevant to our club. If you want to pay attention to him and get annoyed by his comments, that's on you mate. 

[BridgeIsBlue 66,549]

Just now, DeanMK said:

Shouldn't make a difference to us. 

It already has though. 

[British_Empire 9,648]

1 minute ago, DeanMK said:

He can spout as much as he wants. Shouldn't make a difference to us. He's a walloper who aspires to be a carbon copy of Chris Sutton. Completely and utterly irrelevant to our club. If you want to pay attention to him and get annoyed by his comments, that's on you mate. 

That's an odd stance.

Guys like Stewart and Sutton (whether we like it or not) are far from an irrelevance when they can run us into the ground, in public, on platforms (in Stewart's case a public-funded one) 

Their irresponsible comments form bandwagons against us and generate heat. It's extremely naive to think otherwise.

[Prso's headband 35,257]

16 minutes ago, DeanMK said:

He can spout as much as he wants. Shouldn't make a difference to us. He's a walloper who aspires to be a carbon copy of Chris Sutton. Completely and utterly irrelevant to our club. If you want to pay attention to him and get annoyed by his comments, that's on you mate. 

I don’t get annoyed or even listen to the guy. My point is he has multiple platforms in Scotland which essentially shape the narrative of our players and club. 
 

All well and good ignoring the wee weasel but he sets a narrative everytime he’s in the media, whether that be analysis, radio or newspaper and that’s a problem for us as a club 

[DeanMK 4,641]

13 minutes ago, British_Empire said:

That's an odd stance.

Guys like Stewart and Sutton (whether we like it or not) are far from an irrelevance when they can run us into the ground, in public, on platforms (in Stewart's case a public-funded one) 

Their irresponsible comments form bandwagons against us and generate heat. It's extremely naive to think otherwise.

I would agree with you completely in a normal society. But in this situation, who are the people who lap up these comments and form the bandwagons? People who already have a negative opinion of us. If Michael Stewart gets up tomorrow and starts singing our praises, the people who were agreeing with him yesterday will be ridiculing him. 

The people who wholeheartedly listen to people like Sutton and Stewart will never change their opinion of us, so I see no reason to even care about them. 

[DeanMK 4,641]

3 minutes ago, Prso's headband said:

I don’t get annoyed or even listen to the guy. My point is he has multiple platforms in Scotland which essentially shape the narrative of our players and club. 
 

All well and good ignoring the wee weasel but he sets a narrative everytime he’s in the media, whether that be analysis, radio or newspaper and that’s a problem for us as a club 

I get where you're coming from, but as alluded to in another comment. People like Michael Stewart don't shape or sway the public opinion of our club, they simply criticize our every move because they know it will be lapped up by their target demographic... Every other cunt in Scottish football that isn't one of us. 

[DeanMK 4,641]

22 minutes ago, BridgeIsBlue said:

It already has though. 

It hasn't. Michael Stewart is riding on the coattails of an anti-Rangers agenda that has been rife in Scotland for years. We have two types of people in the Scottish football universe. Us and everyone else. We'll never change everyone else's opinion of our club, so I don't see why Stewart's opinion's should be taken seriously. 

[Gandalf the Blue 1,384]

Big Iwelumo didn't let him away with it tbf to him. Said of course a manager and club will defend their player and maybe the card would've been out quicker if it was morelos 

[hammer93 15,054]

A guy who is now employed by the nappy rippers  is allowed to still spout his supposed impartial view on Scotland's flag ship highlight show tells me everything about this country 

[Bears 791]

Wheeled back in to give the compliance officer her instructions.

[scottyscott1963 18,192]

POINT SCORING paedo apologised for a beast that he played with at hearts,wonder why?.
Probably a racist in there as well!!..
AM is assaulted by a studs up follow through,and that Rangers hating prick said "it's a red,just get on with it"...fuck me...  

[Ryan_1 1,136]

Mikey Stewart is a wank end thread 

[Dickie 12,905]

5 hours ago, Prso's headband said:

I don’t get annoyed or even listen to the guy. My point is he has multiple platforms in Scotland which essentially shape the narrative of our players and club. 
 

All well and good ignoring the wee weasel but he sets a narrative everytime he’s in the media, whether that be analysis, radio or newspaper and that’s a problem for us as a club 

Totally agree.stewart should be an irrelevance but as we all know sportscene sets the agenda for what the so called compliance officer deals with and as we all know if Morelos had made that challenge and got off scot free then the shit storm in the media would have been off the scale.

[Kaydubya11 580]

The fact that this arsehole is still being employed by BBC Scotland shows the contempt they have for Rangers supporters.  

 

Since I posted I found out they employ Neil McCann too so that point was maybe wrong....

[G13 3,038]

I'm hoping he has an early death.

[Tiger Shaw 30,340]

Mind he put a video up of himself slapping a heavy bag trying to act hard 🤣