.Williamson. 82,159 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 42 minutes ago, 6superbarry6 said: I genuinely fucking hate our board You don't hate anybody, that's an awful thing to say Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiritofBillStruth 167 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 Kid gloves statement by bumbling idiots with no interest in defending this club, brand or staff members. A boardroom full of charlatans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,791 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, esquire8 said: Gerrard has a fear of looking like Benitez and his facts rant. He won't fight anything in the media with force. If that is the case, he should maybe realise he is in the wrong job at this time in Scotland. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
esquire8 42,452 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bears r us said: If that is the case, he should maybe realise he is in the wrong job at this time in Scotland. If he realised that.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
6superbarry6 14,159 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 4 minutes ago, .Williamson. said: You don't hate anybody, that's an awful thing to say I treat them with the contempt they consistently show us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, Bears r us said: If we have evidence that TLB said whatever and was not cited then that has to be used any time we are cited, if the SFA still don't accept they have been using a different set of rules for the two bog clubs then we must take it further IMO. It is a clusterfuck and been going on far too long now. We are treated differently, they're not even hiding it mate. They don't even care how blatant it is. Would love to see how we take it further, seems every way I look is a closed door. I'm sure someone will say CAS. Complaining to them about the authorities will only have 1 outcome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottBF2 3,540 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 I’d imagine he’s being brought up on ‘implied bias’, which the hearing panel could very easily swing as true. They could potentially make a case that Gerrard was saying Clancy is biased against Morelos/Rangers and that only if we/Morelos had committed the foul then it would’ve been a red card offence. Any decent argument from us would rip that thought process to shreds, which is why I think we'll struggle to overturn the citation. We’re fucking useless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,791 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 30 minutes ago, Sparkle said: Nothing wrong with that! The only thing wrong with it S is that the SFA know he is right, and that would never do now would it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,791 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 12 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: We are treated differently, they're not even hiding it mate. They don't even care how blatant it is. Would love to see how we take it further, seems every way I look is a closed door. I'm sure someone will say CAS. Complaining to them about the authorities will only have 1 outcome. I am no expert in the rules of football associations, but in most walks of life there is usually a route to take IF an authority is treating certain members differently to others, so it is up to our legal guys to sort that out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GersInCanada 7,775 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 The blatant anti-Rangers stance by authorities is staggering. While as covid continues many of it's members are about to go belly up. They only care about the 10 in a row bullshit. Put our top legal team on this, win the case, and call for a vote of no confidence is surely the only way forward. Fight fire with fire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Bears r us said: I am no expert in the rules of football associations, but in most walks of life there is usually a route to take IF an authority is treating certain members differently to others, so it is up to our legal guys to sort that out. I'm all ears to suggestions where that could be mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeeSS 512 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 1 hour ago, bluenoz said: And people question why he doesn't speak out more often. Who made the notice of complaint. Clancy? the CO? Doncaster? Scottish football is corrupt to the core and I'm beginning to think we have no chance of stopping 10. Clancy wasn’t the referee it was Don Robertson! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
superallysbears 7,580 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, GeeSS said: Clancy wasn’t the referee it was Don Robertson! It was Clancy for the Dundee Hivs, Don Robertson was against the other Hivs at the weekend there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears 792 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 28 minutes ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: So you want us to publicly criticise him for that? Do I want us as a club to publicly criticise Clancy for basically saying that he and the other refs are aware of the special importance of decisions made concerning the fact that that lot are trying to win a record breaking supposed tenth title in a row (no matter how tainted it is)? Yes. But I was meaning that this should be used as the basis of the defence for Gerrard's statement that implied that rules were not being applied fairly concerning us (and them and the teams we are both playing). Your thread on Officialdom Conspiracy shows plenty of that. The defence of Gerrard can show many examples of this to support the fact that Clancy is at least being consistent in his biased decisions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeeSS 512 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 Just now, superallysbears said: It was Clancy for the Dundee Hivs, fon Robertson was against the other Hivs at the weekend there. So it was my apologies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimfanciesthedude 24,540 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, GeeSS said: Clancy wasn’t the referee it was Don Robertson! No he wasnt, Robertson was the hibs ref, this is about morelos being crocked against united Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,791 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 1 minute ago, SeparateEntityMyArse said: I'm all ears to suggestions where that could be mate. I honestly don't know but we should have some route to take when we are being treated differently from other teams in the same league. We must have pages and pages of evidence just ready to use. I would be happy to contribute to a crowdfund for a legal case if that was our only way to do it. No football association can be above the law of the land. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
superallysbears 7,580 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 That Clancy is a dirty stinking fenian bastard! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STEPPS BOY 73,890 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 Said it before but unless anything is contractually obliged then give the SFA/SPFL fuck all. Interviews with Sky after the game send someone from back room staff. Photo - shoots send a 16 yr old academy player. Give them the absolute bare minimum and that includes use of stadium and Auchenhowie. Their contempt towards us should be reciprocated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robmc1 4,741 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 43 minutes ago, Bears r us said: Our game is in a terrible state in Scotland now. At a time when the governing body are talking about going cap in hand to the Scottish assembly (not govt. as point of principle) they decide to push on with this nonsense whereas the money it will undoubtedly cost in administration and legal fee’s alone could and should have been put to some other more worthwhile cause in keeping the game afloat at this time. Any half competent legal representative could present a credible and compelling case proving that Morelos has undoubtedly been harshly, wrongly and unfairly treated by officials in the past 2 seasons which imo justifies SG’s comments. I would also cite other managers comments which have been controversial yet have not faced any sanction. This will be an interesting process... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluenoz 30,824 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 40 minutes ago, ScottBF2 said: I’d imagine he’s being brought up on ‘implied bias’, which the hearing panel could very easily swing as true. They could potentially make a case that Gerrard was saying Clancy is biased against Morelos/Rangers and that only if we/Morelos had committed the foul then it would’ve been a red card offence. Any decent argument from us would rip that thought process to shreds, which is why I think we'll struggle to overturn the citation. We’re fucking useless. if it is 'implied bias' like you say which you are probably right, then Clancy's comments about 10iar were even worse 'implied bias' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bears r us 30,791 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 1 hour ago, Robmc1 said: At a time when the governing body are talking about going cap in hand to the Scottish assembly (not govt. as point of principle) they decide to push on with this nonsense whereas the money it will undoubtedly cost in administration and legal fee’s alone could and should have been put to some other more worthwhile cause in keeping the game afloat at this time. Any half competent legal representative could present a credible and compelling case proving that Morelos has undoubtedly been harshly, wrongly and unfairly treated by officials in the past 2 seasons which imo justifies SG’s comments. I would also cite other managers comments which have been controversial yet have not faced any sanction. This will be an interesting process... It is always said we cannot do anything because the SFA cannot be challenged, but I think there has to be someway, even if it is through the courts. Our dossiers on these wankers must be huge now with the amount of shite that has been going on for years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eejay the dj 31,964 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 51 minutes ago, .Williamson. said: You don't hate anybody, that's an awful thing to say I genuinely despise them to the pit of my stomach .So much .It will make me contemplate walking away this season .Football is a farce in Scotland and our board are gutless to a man .It is not enjoyable anymore and they are a massive part of our weakness in everything that happens up here The days of football before politics in this Country are well gone .Our board are quite happy ,just to rake in the season ticket money .No doubts for me This will be like the Collum episode .Big statements but ultimately take it up the arse with a fine and no comeback like the Candeas disgrace Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeparateEntityMyArse 53,715 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 22 minutes ago, Bears said: Do I want us as a club to publicly criticise Clancy for basically saying that he and the other refs are aware of the special importance of decisions made concerning the fact that that lot are trying to win a record breaking supposed tenth title in a row (no matter how tainted it is)? Yes. But I was meaning that this should be used as the basis of the defence for Gerrard's statement that implied that rules were not being applied fairly concerning us (and them and the teams we are both playing). Your thread on Officialdom Conspiracy shows plenty of that. The defence of Gerrard can show many examples of this to support the fact that Clancy is at least being consistent in his biased decisions. 1. The club would be sanctioned. 2. Theres numerous examples but don't be surprised if we're told they're irrelevant its all about this specific matter. If so he'll get done for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Williamson. 82,159 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, eejay the dj said: I genuinely despise them to the pit of my stomach .So much .It will make me contemplate walking away this season .Football is a farce in Scotland and our board are gutless to a man .It is not enjoyable anymore and they are a massive part of our weakness in everything that happens up here The days of football before politics in this Country are well gone .Our board are quite happy ,just to rake in the season ticket money .No doubts for me This will be like the Collum episode .Big statements but ultimately take it up the arse with a fine and no comeback like the Candeas disgrace I was taking the piss mate. I hate loads of people Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.